Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70033743

Mineral sources and transport pathways for arsenic release in a coastal watershed, USA

Abstract

Metasedimentary bedrock of coastal Maine contains a diverse suite of As-bearing minerals that act as significant sources of elements found in ground and surface waters in the region. Arsenic sources in the Penobscot Formation include, in order of decreasing As content by weight: l&ouml;llingite and realgar ( c. 70%), arsenopyrite, cobaltite, glaucodot, and gersdorffite (in the range of 34&ndash;45%), arsenian pyrite (<4%), and pyrrhotite (<0.15%). In the Penobscot Formation, the relative stability of primary As-bearing minerals follows a pattern where the most commonly observed highly altered minerals are pyrrhotite, realgar, niccolite, l&ouml;llingite > glaucodot, arsenopyrite-cobaltian > arsenopyrite, cobaltite, gersdorffite, fine-grained pyrite, Ni-pyrite > coarse-grained pyrite. Reactions illustrate that oxidation of Fe-As disulphide group and As-sulphide minerals is the primary release process for As. Liberation of As by carbonation of realgar and orpiment in contact with high-pH groundwaters may contribute locally to elevated contents of As in groundwater, especially where As is decoupled from Fe. Released metals are sequestered in secondary minerals by sorption or by incorporation in crystal structures. Secondary minerals acting as intermediate As reservoirs include claudetite ( c. 75%), orpiment (61%), scorodite ( c. 45%), secondary arsenopyrite ( c. 46%), goethite (<4490&thinsp;ppm), natrojarosite (<42&thinsp;ppm), rosenite, melanterite, ferrihydrite, and Mn-hydroxide coatings. Some soils also contain Fe-Co-Ni-arsenate, Ca-arsenate, and carbonate minerals. Reductive dissolution of Fe-oxide minerals may govern the ultimate release of iron and arsenic &ndash; especially As(V) &ndash; to groundwater; however, dissolution of claudetite (arsenic trioxide) may directly contribute As(III). Processes thought to explain the release of As from minerals in bedrock include oxidation of arsenian pyrite or arsenopyrite, or carbonation of As-sulphides, and most models based on these generally rely on discrete minerals or on a fairly limited series of minerals. In contrast, in the Penobscot Formation and other metasedimentary rocks of coastal Maine, oxidation of As-bearing Fe-cobalt-nickel-sulphide minerals, dissolution (by reduction) of As-bearing secondary As and Fe hydroxide and sulphate minerals, carbonation and/or oxidation of As-sulphide minerals, and desorption of As from Fe-hydroxide mineral surfaces are all thought to be involved. All of these processes contribute to the occurrence of As in groundwaters in coastal Maine, as a result of variability in composition and in stability of the As source minerals. Arsenic contents of soils and groundwater thus reflect the predominant influence and integration of a spectrum of primary mineral reservoirs (instead of single or unique mineral reservoirs). Cycling of As through metasedimentary bedrock aquifers may therefore depend on consecutive stages of carbonation, oxidation and reductive dissolution of primary and secondary As host minerals.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 43.004647127794435° to 45.72152152227954° latitude; -71.3671875° to -66.7529296875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nora K. Foley, Robert A. Ayuso. 2022-06-06. Mineral sources and transport pathways for arsenic release in a coastal watershed, USA. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873%2F07-152

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Using sediment chemical fractions and multivariate statistics on water to identify sources, mobility, and bioavailability of aluminum in the Florida River near Durango, Colorado

The Florida River in southwestern Colorado, USA, flows through the Southern Ute Reservation and is a cultural and water resource to Tribal and non-Tribal communities. High concentrations of total Al, up to 16 400 µg l –1 , have been detected in the Florida River. Elevated Al concentrations in water may affect aquatic organisms’ ability to regulate ions and inhibit respiratory functions. Water chemistry collected during three sampling events in 2022 from the Florida River and two of its tributaries are used here to better understand the spatial distribution, seasonality, and sources of Al concentrations in the Florida River. Streambed sediment and rock chemistry is also used to infer geologic sources of Al in the watershed. A five-stage sequential extraction was performed on streambed sediment and rock samples to help determine Al transport processes. We assessed relations between major and trace elements in water using a principal component analysis, finding that high Al concentrations in the Florida River (>3500 µg l –1 total Al) are caused by the erosion of Al-laden sediments. We used a stepwise multiple linear regression to investigate the relationship between land use and Al concentrations. Land use did not reliably predict Al concentration, though increased streamflow connected to reservoir releases – particularly in the Salt Creek tributary – were found to contribute Al to the Florida River during the irrigation season. In this study, we demonstrate that successful metal source appropriation may be achieved through limited field sampling when performed with sufficient water chemistry analysis, sequential chemical extraction of stream sediments, and statistical and land-use analysis.

Colorado

Tracking the sources of metals to the San Juan River, Four Corners Region, USA: An introduction to the thematic issue

Surface water quantity and quality is important for arid and semi-arid regions where many people, including underserved and Indigenous communities, rely on a scarce resource for drinking water, irrigation, livestock and ceremonial uses. The southwestern United States, and specifically the Four Corners Region (Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico and Utah), is an example of this situation. Elevated concentrations of metals including aluminium, arsenic and lead were identified in previous studies and this study in the San Juan River from below the Navajo Dam, through the Navajo Nation to Mexican Hat, Utah. An interdisciplinary team applied approaches and principles of geology, geochemistry, geomorphology, hydrology and statistics to gain a better understanding of the tributaries supplying the source(s) of metals to the San Juan River. This introductory paper provides an overview of the ‘Metal geochemical fingerprinting to identify sub-watershed source contributions to surface water at a regional arid watershed scale, Four Corners Region, USA’ thematic collection . An overview of sampling sites, techniques and potential sources of metals is provided. Approaches used in this study could be applied to investigations in similar systems globally.

Four Corners region

Applying geological unit distribution and chemical weathering indices to evaluate potential lithological sources of Al, As and Pb to the San Juan River, Four Corners region, USA

In arid to semi-arid landscapes, sporadic monsoonal events, varying widely in scale and distribution, can generate overland flow resulting in streamflow in ephemeral channels. These channels may contain metal-laden sediments that are a by-product of the weathering and erosion of local geological units. To evaluate the potential for local geology to contribute aluminium (Al), arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) to the San Juan River, northwestern New Mexico, USA, the distributions of geological units were delineated for 12 hydrological basins within the greater San Juan River watershed. Concentrations of Al, As and Pb in the predominant geological units were compiled from data in the National Geochemical Database. Chemical indices of weathering (CIW) were calculated for geological units with greater than 5% coverage in the entire San Juan River watershed. Based on CIWs of the major geological units, the Mesaverde Group (CIW = 95.2), Chinle and Dolores Formations ( combined ) (CIW = 93.3), and Mancos Shale ( combined ) (CIW = 82.6) are the most likely units to weather, erode and contribute sediments with elevated concentrations of Al, As and Pb to the San Juan River. The results of this study show the importance of understanding geological sources of sediments because they could be substantial contributors of constituents of concern to water, especially in arid environments where surface water may be the only source of water in the region.

Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah