Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · pp1408B

Geohydrologic framework of the Snake River plain regional aquifer system, Idaho and eastern Oregon

Abstract

The Snake River Plain in southern Idaho is a major geologic structure of uncertain origin. Surface geology is generally well defined, but subsurface geology is poorly defined below about 500 feet. Rocks that underlie the plain form the framework for a regional ground-water system that supplies large quantities of water for irrigation and makes the plain nationally important in terms of agricultural production. The 15,600-square-mile Snake River Plain is a grabenlike structure that formed in middle Miocene time. The graben may have been formed by oblique extensional forces resulting from interactions between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. The oldest known rocks underlying the plain, penetrated in a 14,007-foot-deep test hole northwest of Boise, are of middle Miocene age. Miocene volcanic rocks at the plain's margin that dip toward and underlie the plain were highly faulted and se- verely eroded before the plain was formed. Faults along the margins of the eastern part of the plain are not visible at land surface and have been defined chiefly by geo- physical methods. However, well-defined fault systems bound the western part of the plain. The eastern plain is underlain predominantly by Quaternary basalt of the Snake River Group, which is intercalated with sedimentary rocks along the margins. Basalt crops out or is less than 10 feet below land surface in the central part of the east- ern plain and is usually less than 100 feet below land surface elsewhere. Geophysical data and drillers' logs indicate that Quaternary basalt in the central part of the eastern plain is as much as 5,000 feet thick. A test hole about 10 miles northeast of the Snake River near Wendell provided the first information about deep subsurface stratigraphic relations in that part of the plain. The stratigraphic sequence penetrated in the test hole is similar to that in the north wall of the Snake River canyon be- tween Milner and King Hill. In that area, basalt of the Snake River Group thins toward the river and is underlain by sedi- mentary rocks and basalt of the Tertiary and Quaternary Idaho Group. The western plain is underlain mainly by unconsolidated and weakly consolidated Tertiary and Quaternary sedimentary rocks as much as 5,000 feet thick. Basalt also is present in the west- ern plain and is most extensive near Mountain Home. Quaternary basalt of the Snake River Group, which composes much of the Snake River Plain regional aquifer system, is highly transmissive. In the eastern plain, a thick sequence of thin- layered basalt flows yields large volumes of water to wells. Wells open to less than 100 feet of the aquifer yield as much as 7,000 gallons per minute; yields of 2,000 to 3,000 gallons per minute with only a few feet of drawdown are common. Transmissivity commonly exceeds 100,000 feet squared per day and, in places, 1 million feet squared per day. Large springs in the Snake River canyon between Milner and King Hill issue at the contact between highly transmissive pil- low lava and less transmissive underlying rocks. In 1980, ground-water discharge between Milner and King Hill, largely spring flow, averaged about 6,000 cubic feet per second. In the western plain, coarse-grained sedimentary deposits are thickest and transmissivity is highest along the northern mar- gins. The percentage of coarse-grained sedimentary deposits de- creases to the southwest, where lacustrine sedimentary deposits predominate. In most of the eastern plain, the upper part of the ground- water system is unconfined. At depth and in much of the west- ern plain, aquifers are confined. Across most of the plain, Quaternary basalt aquifers overlie aquifers in the Tertiary Idavada Volcanics and Banbury Basalt of the Idaho Group. The older volcanic rocks are typically much less transmissive than the Quaternary basalt. Faults and frac- tures are permeable zones for water storage and conduits for water movement. In places near the margins of the plain, the Idavada Volcanics contains important geothermal aquifers.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 42° to 45° latitude; -117° to -111° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R.L. Whitehead. 1992. Geohydrologic framework of the Snake River plain regional aquifer system, Idaho and eastern Oregon. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1408b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

The effects of management practices on grassland birds—Vesper Sparrow ( Pooecetes gramineus )

Keys to Vesper Sparrow ( Pooecetes gramineus ) management include providing dry, open areas with short, sparse vegetation or edge habitat between forests and fields and providing elevated song perches. Vesper Sparrows have been reported to use habitats with 8–134 centimeters (cm) average vegetation height, 2–21 cm visual obstruction reading, 3–52 percent grass cover, no more than 76 percent forb cover, no more than 17 percent shrub cover, 1–57 percent bare ground, 6–63 percent litter cover, and no more than 5 cm litter depth.

Professional Paper↗

Allostratigraphy and formalizing the Cold Harbor Alloformation, Virginia Coastal Plain, Eastern Virginia

Introduction Distinct morphologic features in the Virginia part of the Coastal Plain Province (herein referred to as the Virginia Coastal Plain) were noted in one of the earliest geologic surveys in 1839 (Rogers, 1884). South of the James River, Rogers (1884, p. 252) described a western bench that ranged from “a low rocky coast…of the primeval sea” to an eastern facing scarp east of the City of Suffolk, Virginia. His eastern bench extended from the scarp at Suffolk, which he suggested was a former shoreline, to the present Atlantic Ocean. Notably, the eastern plain was described as less dissected than the western plain. In Virginia, creation and publication of topographic maps by the U. S. Geological Survey began in the mid-1880s. By 1905, many areas in eastern Virginia were mapped as 30-minute and 15-minute series with 10-foot (ft) contour interval accuracy (Virginia Division of Mineral Resources [VDMR] , 2008). After the continued release of these early maps that displayed Virginia Coastal Plain morphology in increasingly greater detail, several geological reports were published where scarps and plains were traced, named, and origins proposed (Shaler, 1890; Shattuck, 1901; Clark and Miller, 1906, 1912; Wentworth, 1930). Shattuck (1901) recognized three continuous scarps in Maryland and most importantly suggested that there was a correlation between surficial deposits (geologic formations) and morphologic terraces; this defined the terrace-formation concept that became the basis of geologic mapping of the Upper Pliocene and Pleistocene sediments in the Virginia Coastal Plain. Clark and Miller (1912) described three Pleistocene formations and supported the terrace-formation concept because the sediments within each formation were lithologically similar to one another, and differentiating them by comparing key vertical sections was not helpful. In Virginia, Wentworth (1930) defined and mapped five Pleistocene terraces on the basis of correlating morphologic terraces with their underlying formation sediments. Similarly, Cooke (1931) identified and traced seven marine shorelines and proposed corresponding terrace names from Maryland to Florida. Cooke (1931) also pointed out that the various elevations of scarps were related to interglacial sea-level highstands whereas prior workers called on vertical land movement of emergence and submergence to create shoreline scarps. Cooke’s (1936) geologic map of eastern South Carolina showing the Pleistocene sediments is also based on the terrace-formation concept. Detailed geologic mapping of the Virginia Coastal Plain by Virginia Division of Mineral Resources (VDMR) and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) followed lithostratigraphic convention for Early Pliocene and older marine sediments. However, geologic mapping of Upper Pliocene and Pleistocene sediments used the concept of morphologic setting and elevations of scarp toe and flat-plain, or the terrace-formation concept. The 1983 version of the North American Stratigraphic Code (hereafter the Code) (North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature [NACSN] , 1983) introduced allostratigraphy that gave credence to the terrace-formation concept. According to the current Code (NACSN, 2021; Article 58), “an allostratigraphic unit is a mappable body of rock that is defined and identified on the basis of its bounding discontinuities,” and, “formal allostratigraphic units may be defined or distinguish between different (1) superposed discontinuity-bounded deposits of similar lithology, (2) contiguous discontinuity-bounded deposits of similar lithology, or (3) geographically separated discontinuity-bounded units of similar lithology…The lithology of an allostratigraphic unit plays no part in its definition.” However, definition and placement of bounding discontinuities relies on lateral and vertical knowledge of lithology and is so recognized in Article 58e, “A type locality and type area must be designated; a composite stratotype or a type section and several reference sections are desirable.” We understand that each of the terrace formations of Late Pliocene and Pleistocene age were deposited during a marine transgressive event tied to an interglacial sea-level highstand (scarp above the Poquoson Member of the Tabb Formation may be the result of a still-stand as sea level was falling after deposition of the Lynnhaven Member, refer to fig. 1). The base of each map unit is an unconformity (or is at least in part for the base of the Poquoson) and nomenclature for each unit might be changed from “formation” to “alloformation,” as suggested by Doar and Berquist (2009). Figure 1 shows the relative placement of these mapped and named alloformations as used in the Virginia Coastal Plain and Fall Zone (a zone of transition between the Piedmont and Coastal Plain Provinces) (Berquist, 2021). Except perhaps for the Poquoson, many of these proposed alloformations are unlikely to interfinger or grade laterally seaward into extensive deep marine sediments. After their deposition, erosion during sea-level fall and then rise for the next depositional event would seemingly obliterate any marine connection without a basal unconformity. All these alloformations contain sediments deposited in fluvial, estuarine, and shallow-marine environments and are bound everywhere by unconformities. This paper documents the Cold Harbor Alloformation as a formal stratigraphic unit and the rationale for mapping the sediments using an allostratigraphic classification. The Cold Harbor Alloformation is composed of sediments from a variety of environments such as gravel beds, shoreline beach sands, marsh and estuarine sand and mud, and shallow marine sands. These sediments are found at elevations up to 240 ft and lie unconformably above older sediments and rocks. Our work relied on observations of outcrops and many auger borings to identify basal unconformities.

Virginia↗

Formalization of the Elsing Green Alloformation, Virginia Coastal Plain, Eastern Virginia

The Elsing Green Alloformation is herein formalized as a new Pleistocene alloformation in the Virginia Coastal Plain. This allostratigraphic unit is characterized by an unconformity-bounded terrace deposit occupying a morphologic flat with a mapped elevation range of about 26 to 38 feet (7.9 to 11.6 meters); its landward extent is commonly marked at the base of an erosional scarp where the toe is typically at 38 feet (11.6 meters) and is distinguished by its topographic expression and stratigraphic position. Sediments of this unit were previously mapped as part of the Shirley Formation or Sedgefield Member of the Tabb Formation but differ significantly in their bounding scarps and terrace morphology. The type area is within the Tunstall 7.5-minute quadrangle near Elsing Green Plantation, King William County, Virginia. The reference section is provided by boring 2012270-2. Correlation is proposed with other mid-Pleistocene terrace deposits in the mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, including the younger Lynch Heights Formation of Delaware and the Butlers Bluff Member of the Nassawadox Formation of the Eastern Shore of Virginia. The age of the Elsing Green Alloformation is interpreted to be Marine Isotope Stage 9e (about 330,000 years).

Virginia↗