Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · dr1227

USGS Geochron—A database of geochronological and thermochronological dates and data—Technical documentation

Kelly D. Thomson·Ian W. Hillenbrand·Leah E. Morgan·Amy K. Gilmer·Zachary T. Engle·Anna T. Miller·Andy J. Park
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Geochronological and thermochronological data are essential for constraining the timing and rates of geological processes, supporting geologic mapping, natural hazard assessment, and resource exploration. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Geochron Database is a centralized, relational database that integrates USGS and State geological survey data in accordance with the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 and its reauthorizations. This report documents the structure and development of the database, including its standardized schema, controlled vocabularies, and protocols for compiling legacy and newly published data. The database is designed to adhere to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles and currently (2026) includes data from a wide range of geochronological and thermochronological methods. Public access is provided through the USGS Geochron Database Explorer, a browser-based geographic information system (GIS) interface, and through versioned data releases available on ScienceBase, which provide sample-level summary data and detailed analytical information. The USGS Geochron Database is structured to be extensible, supporting the inclusion of additional methods and data types as they are compiled. This format ensures long-term utility and aligns with the Mapping Act’s directive to create a national archive of geochronological information that adds interpretive value to geologic map data. Its design reflects a commitment to data transparency, scientific reproducibility, and national geoscience priorities.

Explore related subjects

Data ReportReport

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kelly D. Thomson, Ian W. Hillenbrand, Leah E. Morgan, Amy K. Gilmer, Zachary T. Engle, Anna T. Miller, Andy J. Park. 2026-09-03. USGS Geochron—A database of geochronological and thermochronological dates and data—Technical documentation. https://doi.org/10.3133/dr1227

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Data Report subjectReport subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Distribution, abundance, and habitat characteristics of Coastal Cactus Wrens ( Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus ) in San Diego County, California—2025 data summary

Executive Summary We surveyed for coastal Cactus Wren ( Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus ) in 498 established plots in San Diego County, California, in 2025, encompassing 4 genetic clusters (Otay, Lake Jennings, Sweetwater/Encanto, and San Pasqual). Of the 498 plots, 372 have been surveyed every year starting in 2020. Two surveys were completed at each plot between March 1 and July 31. Cactus Wrens were detected in 220 plots (44 percent of plots). In plots that have been consistently surveyed since 2020, Cactus Wrens were detected in 35 percent of plots, similar to 2024 (34 percent), 2021 (35 percent), and 2020 (35 percent), and higher than in 2023 (26 percent) and 2022 (30 percent). Across all survey plots we detected 184 Cactus Wren territories in 2025. We documented 107 territories in plots that have been consistently surveyed since 2020, which is similar to the number of territories in 2024 (106) and 2020 (108), more than we documented in 2022 (93) and 2023 (85), but slightly less than the peak in 2021 (113). Across all survey plots the number of territories increased from 2024 to 2025 in the San Pasqual genetic cluster, increased slightly in the Lake Jennings cluster, decreased slightly in the Sweetwater/Encanto genetic cluster and remained the same in the Otay genetic cluster. At least 83 percent of Cactus Wren territories were occupied by pairs, and 100 fledglings were observed in 2025. We observed three banded Cactus Wrens in 2025. Adult birds ranged from 6 to 9 years old and occupied the same territories as in previous years. Banding of Cactus Wrens ceased in 2019 and as a result we have a very low number of banded wrens remaining in the population, which makes it difficult to detect movement of wrens between genetic clusters. We detected no movement of banded Cactus Wrens between genetic clusters in 2025. Vegetation at Cactus Wren survey plots was dominated by coastal sage scrub shrubs, such as California sagebrush ( Artemisia californica ), California buckwheat ( Eriogonum fasciculatum ), and lemonade berry ( Rhus integrifolia ). Cactus Wrens preferentially selected plots dominated by California buckwheat in the Otay genetic cluster and avoided plots dominated by lemonade berry and jojoba ( Simmondsia chinensis ). Cactus Wrens also appeared to prefer plots dominated by broom baccharis ( Baccharis sarothroides ) while avoiding plots dominated by California sagebrush in the Lake Jennings cluster. No definitive signs of fungal pathogens were observed on cactus within and around survey plots. Blue elderberry ( Sambucus mexicana ) was detected at 43 percent of plots, and Cactus Wrens preferentially occupied more plots with elderberry than were available. Very little dead or unhealthy cactus was observed within all survey plots, and Cactus Wrens preferentially occupied plots with less dead cactus while occupying plots with unhealthy cactus in proportion to its availability. Eighty-nine percent of plots had more than 5 percent of cactus crowded or overtopped by vines and shrubs, and Cactus Wren occupied plots in proportion to the degree of shrub and vine crowding or overtopping. Just over half of the plots had greater than 5 percent non-native annual cover, with Cactus Wrens preferentially occupying plots with less non-native cover.

Data Report↗
USGS2026

Terrain-based map of mélange and intact rock at the junction of Coastal and Central Belt rocks of the Franciscan Complex between Gualala and Ukiah, northern California Coast Ranges

A terrain-based map of a large area of Franciscan Complex between the San Andreas and Maacama faults east of Point Arena, California, provides much new detail compared to prior mapping. The new map reveals an unusual, structurally disrupted area that is defined by northwest-trending patches of erosionally resistant topography interspersed in subdued topography. These two terrain types, here termed Hard and Soft, are distinguished using differences in the detailed shapes of individual topographic elements that in these rocks are indicative of relatively intact rock and severely sheared mélange. The disrupted area lies at the junction between rocks of two different parts of the Franciscan Complex: sandstone and argillite of the Coastal belt to the northwest and mélange and variously metamorphosed sandstone and other rocks of the Central belt to the southeast. The rocks in the disrupted area seem to consist largely of Coastal belt sandstone interspersed in Central belt mélange. They are separated from areally continuous Coastal belt to the west by the newly defined Cedars fault and from continuous mélange of the Central belt to the east by the newly defined Boonville fault. A plausible history to account for Coastal belt rocks and Central belt mélange now interspersed at the same structural level in the disrupted area is westward thrusting of Central belt over Coastal belt on the Coastal belt thrust, located mostly above the present level of exposure, followed by extensional dip-slip faulting involving both the disrupted area and its bounding faults. Most of the study area has been mapped on the ground only in reconnaissance. The terrain map was prepared largely by interpretation of small-scale aerial photographs, with distinctions in the steepness of slopes and curvature of ridge and side-hill crests made from the photographs. These distinctions were then confirmed by differences in their areal abundance determined through quantitative mapping of slope and curvature. Most of the remainder of the map was prepared in the same fashion directly from the slope and curvature maps. Geologic identities are assigned to as much of the area as possible, but some resistant parts, mostly in the disturbed area, remain identified solely as Hard terrain. Some units, mostly along the southern edge of the map, are compiled from published sources. This report serves as a description and explanation of the associated spatial database (Wentworth, 2025), which consists of attributed line and polygon shape files and metadata describing them.

California↗
USGS2026

Range-wide population trend analysis for greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus )—Updated 1960–2025

Greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter sage-grouse) are at the center of State and national land-use policies largely because of their unique life-history traits as an ecological indicator for the health of sagebrush ecosystems. This updated population analysis provides State and Federal land and wildlife managers with the best available science to help guide management and conservation plans aimed at benefitting sage-grouse populations and the ecosystems they inhabit. This analysis relied on previously published population modeling methodology from Coates and others (2021, 2022a) and incorporates population lek count data for 1960–2025. Included in this report are methodological updates to period terminology, expanded reporting of trends across all nadir-to-nadir combinations, and revised extirpation probability estimation that utilizes every historic population nadir to forecast abundance. Each of these updates are detailed under individual Modification sections. Additional updates include simulation analyses that evaluate the effects of progressively longer exclusions of Wyoming lek count data (Wyoming Game and Fish Department has not provided access to a complete lek count data set since 2023) on trends, extirpation probabilities, and targeted annual warning system signals. State-space models estimated a 2.7-percent average annual decline in sage-grouse populations between 1966 and 2021 (Period 1–7, six population oscillations) across their geographical range. The average annual decline among climate clusters for the same number of oscillations ranged between 2.0 and 3.5 percent. Cumulative declines were 42.4, 61.7, and 77.9 percent range-wide in Period 5–7 (19 years [two oscillations]), Period 3–7 (36 years [four oscillations]), and Period 1–7 (55 years), respectively. Between 2024 and 2025 (1-year, non-trend timeframe), range-wide population size declined 1.9 percent ( 95-percent credible interval [CRI]= −4.71–1.48). Simulations of missing data from Wyoming showed that progressively longer gaps produced more negative trend estimates and higher extirpation probabilities, predominantly within Wyoming. Effects on targeted annual warning system signals were more nuanced, with missed warnings occurring inside and outside Wyoming and false warnings occurring predominantly within Wyoming.

California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Nort↗