Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA

Gayle Loren Tyree; A. Chappell; Miguel L. Villarreal; S. Dhital; Michael C. Duniway; B.L. Edwards; A.M. Faist; T.W. Nauman; N.P. Webb

doi:10.1002/esp.5887

USGS · 70259933

Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA

Gayle Loren Tyree·A. Chappell·Miguel L. Villarreal·S. Dhital·Michael C. Duniway·B.L. Edwards·A.M. Faist·T.W. Nauman·N.P. Webb

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Wind erosion and dust emission from drylands have large consequences for ecosystem function and human health. Wind erosion is naturally reduced by soil crusting and sheltering by non-erodible roughness elements such as plants. Land uses that reduce surface roughness and disturb the soil surface can dramatically increase dust emission. Extraction of oil and gas is a common and growing land use in the western United States (US) that removes vegetation and other roughness elements for construction of well pads and unpaved access roads, resulting in thousands of small (1–4 ha), discrete patches of unprotected soil. Here, we use a satellite albedo-based model to assess the effect of oil/gas activity on surface roughness in the Uinta-Piceance Basin, an area of the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) with dense oil and natural gas development and modelled how the change in surface roughness could impact aeolian sediment flux and dust emission. We also investigated how regional drought influences the response of surface roughness to well pads and access roads. Oil/gas activity reduced surface roughness and increased modelled aeolian sediment flux at the landscape scale across much of the study region, resulting in a modest increase of 10 139 kg of dust per year, which is small relative to dust loads from a single regional dust event observed in the region, but downwind impact could be significant. The magnitude of surface roughness reductions by oil/gas activity was generally consistent among land cover types. However, in parts of the basin that had high cover of annual forbs and grasses, oil/gas activity was associated with larger surface roughness and smaller potential dust emission. Drought decreased surface roughness across disturbed and undisturbed sites, but there was no interactive effect of oil/gas activity and drought on surface roughness. These results suggest that oil/gas activity may increase sediment fluxes and likely contributes to dust emission from landscapes in the UCRB. Understanding how drought and land use change contribute to dust emissions will benefit mitigation of undesirable impacts of wind erosion and dust transport.

Explore related subjects

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 37.65911929948223° to 41.270866482469955° latitude; -112.52852783555946° to -106.31026611680981° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Gayle Loren Tyree, A. Chappell, Miguel L. Villarreal, S. Dhital, Michael C. Duniway, B.L. Edwards, A.M. Faist, T.W. Nauman, N.P. Webb. 2024. Oil and gas development influences potential for dust emission from the Upper Colorado River Basin, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5887

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Remote detection of streambank erosion and channel incision using high-resolution, repeat lidar-derived metrics in Raleigh, North Carolina

This study evaluated the use of lidar data to detect streambank erosion and channel incision throughout Raleigh, North Carolina. The study included five components. (1) Generation of lidar-derived rasters, including a digital elevation model of difference that represented channel erosion and positive openness rasters that represented channel incision. (2) Completion of site-based field assessments throughout the study area. (3) Spatial analysis of raster datasets at three spatial scales: erosion patches, channel segments, and subbasins. (4) Comparison of field assessment results with lidar-derived metrics. (5) Pairing of landscape attributes with lidar-derived metrics to evaluate potential causative factors associated with variations in channel incision. Field assessment results indicated 74% of surveyed sites had Bank Erosion Hazard Index ratings ranging from ‘high’ to ‘extreme’ and 77% had ‘high’ or ‘severe’ degrees of channel incision. Select field measures showed agreement with lidar-derived metrics. Lidar-derived erosion patches, ranging in size from 20 to 948 m 2 , were detected in 24.3% of channel segments, and patch density increased with Strahler stream order. Channel segments, ranging from 50 to 150 m, had inconsistent spatial patterns of erosion and incision. Erosion in channel segments increased with Strahler stream order and 36% of channel segments became more incised during the study period. Lidar-derived metrics across subbasins revealed variability of erosion and incision throughout the study area. The assessment of landscape drivers could not explain variability at the channel-segment scale, but subbasins with fewer forests tended to have greater erosion and incision. However, unexplained variability remained, demonstrating the complexity of stream stability in urban watersheds. As lidar datasets become more widespread, pairing remote data with field assessments may be a viable approach to characterize and understand stream geomorphology in urban settings.

North Carolina↗

USGS2026

Deep learning models for mapping surficial geology in selected physiographic regions of New York

Surficial geologic mapping is required for decisions including infrastructure and water-resource development and management. Deep learning, a type of machine learning that uses training data to self-learn and perform tasks, is explored as a tool to help increase efficiency of the labour- and time-intensive mapping process. Deep learning models were trained, and their potential to aid in mapping surficial geology was explored for two physiographic regions in New York: the high-relief Allegheny Plateau and the low-relief Erie-Ontario Lowlands. Key to the development of deep learning models is the availability of highly detailed surficial geologic maps in each of these regions from which the models can learn. Through exploring different groupings of surficial deposits and their corresponding spatial data, deep learning models were iteratively developed to reproduce published mapping for greater than 79% of the training areas, and with similar accuracy in test areas within the same physiographic region. These models were trained using only two inputs: high-resolution lidar data and previously published surficial geologic maps. This straightforward approach is intended to make the methods and models created easily reproducible using widely accessible datasets. This research describes the strengths and limitations of lidar-derived surficial geologic models and how broadly grouping surficial types, characteristics of different physiographic regions, and testing models in physiographic regions outside of their training areas affect model creation and performance. In addition, the models created could be used as a tool for mapping surficial geology in similar physiographic regions, in addition to establishing a framework for creating similar models elsewhere.

New York↗

USGS2026

Regional models for postfire debris-flow likelihood and rainfall thresholds across the western United States

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) uses an empirical model developed with logistic regression (the ‘M1’ model) to rapidly assess debris-flow likelihood and to identify quantitative rainfall thresholds for debris flows after wildfire in the western United States. The M1 model was calibrated to a debris-flow inventory from southern California (United States) and has been applied throughout the western United States. Limited spatial coverage in the calibration dataset has motivated evaluation of M1 model accuracy outside the calibration region (e.g., the Sierra Nevada or the eastern Cascade Range, United States). Previous test cases showed that M1 overpredicts debris-flow likelihood and underpredicts rainfall thresholds for some locations (e.g., Arizona, northern California, Colorado, New Mexico, United States). We sought to improve the regional applicability of a debris-flow likelihood model by expanding the debris-flow inventory used for calibration, testing multiple potential models and generating an updated model framework. The updated inventory includes 3788 observations from 67 burned areas paired with short duration rainfall ratios. The updated model framework consists of a modified model structure and sets of coefficients calibrated separately to the entire updated inventory and to subsets of the inventory that intersect three Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Level 2 ecoregions (Mediterranean California, Upper Gila Mountains and Western Cordillera). Comparisons of predictions from the updated models with observed rainfall and debris-flow activity show that the updated models outperform the M1 model by ~15%–60% and improve the uniformity of predictive performance across the western United States. The updated models also reduce false positive rates relative to M1 and generate rainfall thresholds that are better aligned with relative differences in regional climatology and debris-flow activity.

Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nev↗