Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70230402

Estimating the aboveground biomass and carbon stocks of tall shrubs in a prerestoration degraded salt marsh

Jacqualyn Fouse·Meagan J. Eagle·Kevin D. Kroeger·Timothy P. Smith
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Wetlands play a vital role in Earth's carbon cycle and provide important ecosystem services. Their ability to perform their roles can be compromised by human activities that destroy or impair their functioning. The restoration of degraded wetlands may allow carbon cycle functioning, as well as other services, to be recovered. Predicting the potential outcomes from any restoration project requires upfront consideration, including via modeling possible changes in carbon stocks. In this study, we quantified the carbon stocks in tall shrub vegetation proliferating in a degraded salt marsh that is currently the subject of an extensive restoration project. We produced allometric models to estimate biomass and carbon stocks for three tall shrub species, which, along with other freshwater and upland species in the area, will die with continued restoration. Therefore, estimating the potential for carbon losses in biomass is important. We also developed a means of estimating carbon stocks in other nontree plants in the estuary area. Useful equations for estimating the biomass of tall shrubs are limited in general and lacking for degraded systems. Our study adds to the literature on carbon stocks in shrub species and fills a data gap for degraded ecosystems. It also contributes to the broader carbon feasibility study of the aforementioned restoration project that was designed to predict the overall net impact of the project on greenhouse gas emissions in the ecosystem.

Explore related subjects

Restoration EcologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jacqualyn Fouse, Meagan J. Eagle, Kevin D. Kroeger, Timothy P. Smith. 2022-04-05. Estimating the aboveground biomass and carbon stocks of tall shrubs in a prerestoration degraded salt marsh. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13684

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Biocrust restoration in novel climates: Assisted migration, habitat amelioration, and varied community composition as climate-smart techniques

Introduction Successful restoration of terrestrial drylands depends on stable, fertile soils that retain water. These functions are provided by biological soil crusts (biocrust), suggesting their reestablishment is a critical step in dryland restoration. Restoration may be hindered by the increasingly documented negative effects of climate change, while new climate-smart biocrust restoration methods may improve short- and long-term restoration outcomes. Objectives In this study, we evaluated three approaches to climate-smart biocrust restoration: assisted migration, habitat amelioration via shading, and varied community composition. Methods We collected biocrusts from across wide geographic gradients spanning multiple climate regimes, including wide ranges of mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and precipitation seasonality. We used biocrust from these different environments as inoculum in two common garden restoration trials, in a research greenhouse testing shading and drying, and at a rangeland field site evaluating shading and warming. Results Community composition was related to climate across the natal (inoculum source) sites, and differences in the initial proportion of moss, lichen, and cyanobacteria resulted in different responses to experimental restoration treatments. We found mixed support for the efficacy of assisted migration and likely not enough success to outweigh the potential risks at present. Shading facilitated moss establishment even under warmer and drier conditions but inhibited lichen establishment and had little effect on cyanobacteria, which colonized quickly between mosses and lichens. Conclusion Overall, our results suggest several potential paths forward for biocrust restoration in warming drylands.

western United States↗
USGS2026

Assessing working lands as habitat for disturbance-dependent birds using autonomous recording units

Introduction Working lands can provide habitat for declining disturbance-dependent birds, such as Bachman's Sparrow ( Peucaea aestivalis ) and Northern Bobwhite ( Colinus virginianus ), but it remains unclear whether restoration following intensive land use (e.g. surface mining) yields habitat comparable to less intensive land uses (e.g. timber production). Objectives We evaluated effects of land use both in working lands (recently replanted surface mine reclamation site and recently replanted timber production site) and reference sites explicitly managed for wildlife (recently restored young pine savanna and mature pine savanna) and understory vegetation characteristics on relative abundance of disturbance-dependent birds within upland pine ( Pinus spp.) communities in southeastern Georgia, United States. We hypothesized that the mine reclamation site would support similar bird species but in lower relative abundances than other land uses. Methods We conducted daily acoustic surveys using autonomous recording units (ARUs) and measured vegetation surveys once per point from May to June 2024. We used Royle-Nichols models, an adapted occupancy model, to estimate relative abundance for eight bird species. Results Land use influenced relative abundance for all species and explained more variation in relative abundance than measured understory vegetation characteristics. The mining reclamation site supported most disturbance-dependent species and, in some cases, equal or higher relative abundances, particularly for Northern Bobwhite and Common Nighthawk ( Chordeiles minor ). Responses across timber production and savanna sites varied by species. Vegetation effects were generally weaker and species-specific, suggesting that land use history and associated habitat legacies play an important role in structuring these bird communities. Conclusion Working lands, including reclaimed mines, can provide habitat for disturbance-dependent birds, and ARUs are effective for evaluating these patterns across land uses.

Restoration Ecology↗
USGS2026

Mesophotic octocoral larval settlement preferences and behaviors

Introduction Lab-based coral reproduction is advancing restoration efforts to support coral populations injured by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Objectives This study aimed to answer foundational questions concerning coral spawning and larval settlement that need to be resolved for these mesophotic and deep-sea coral species before restoration efforts can be scaled up. Methods From 2021 to 2023, fragments of the mesophotic octocorals Swiftia exserta and Thesea nivea were collected from the continental shelf offshore from Texas to Florida and transported to a federal facility in Florida. Multiyear spawning allowed for in-depth analysis of spawning periodicity, egg development, larval behavior, settlement rate, and substrate preference. In addition, we determined the likelihood of successful development and survival during early stages of development. Results Fertilization rates remained high throughout spawning periods of both species, with S. exserta spawning during a 1-month period and T. nivea continuing to spawn year-round. Larvae from both corals significantly preferred tiles seeded with crustose coralline algae, and there were species-specific preferences in substrate material. Additionally, larval survival or mortality was typically evident within a few days when in the presence of settlement substrates. In the absence of substrates, we observed larvae surviving for up to 2 months without settling. Conclusions This work answers critical questions to inform the long-term logistical planning for eventual out-planting of these species. Further, it highlights avenues that could accelerate future restoration-based reproduction efforts into unexplored mesophotic and deep species.

Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas↗