Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70227653

Resilience management for conservation of inland recreational fisheries

E. V. Camp·M. A. Kaemingk·R. N. M. Ahrens·W. M. Potts·W. E. Pine·O. L. F Weyl·Kevin L. Pope
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Resilience thinking has generated much interest among scientific communities, yet most resilience concepts have not materialized into management applications. We believe that using resilience concepts to characterize systems and the social and ecological processes affecting them is a way to integrate resilience into better management decisions. This situation is exemplified by inland recreational fisheries, which represent complex socioecological systems that face unpredictable and unavoidable change. Making management decisions in the context of resilience is increasingly important given mounting environmental and anthropogenic perturbations to inland systems. Herein, we propose a framework that allows resilience concepts to be better incorporated into management by (i) recognizing how current constraints and management objectives focus on desired or undesired systems (specific fish and anglers), (ii) evaluating the state of a system in terms of how both social and ecological forces enforce or erode the desired or undesired system, (iii) identifying the resilience-stage cycles a system state may undergo, and (iv) determining the broad management strategies that may be viable given the system state and resilience stage. We use examples from inland recreational fisheries to illustrate different system state and resilience stages and synthesize several key results. Across all combinations of socioecological forces, five common types of viable management strategies emerge: (i) adopt a different management preference or focus, (ii) change stakeholder attitudes or behaviors via stakeholder outreach, (iii) engage in (sometimes extreme) biological intervention, (iv) engage in fishery intervention, and (v) adopt landscape-level management approaches focusing on achieving different systems in different waters. We then discuss the challenges and weaknesses of our approach, including specifically the cases in which there are multiple strong social forces (i.e., stakeholders holding competing objectives or values) and situations where waters are not readily divisible, such as rivers or great lakes, and in which spatial separation of competing objectives will be difficult. We end with our vision of how we believe these types of operationalized resilience approaches could improve or transform inland recreational fisheries management.

Explore related subjects

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. V. Camp, M. A. Kaemingk, R. N. M. Ahrens, W. M. Potts, W. E. Pine, O. L. F Weyl, Kevin L. Pope. 2020-01-10. Resilience management for conservation of inland recreational fisheries. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00498

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

From sediment pulse to ecological recovery: A nine-year study of benthic macroinvertebrate response to Elwha River dam removal

Large dam removals are increasingly important river restoration actions, but long-term ecological responses remain poorly understood, especially for removals involving large sediment releases. We evaluated benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) responses following removal of the Elwha and Glines Canyon dams on the Elwha River, Washington, USA. At the time of removal (2011–2014), these were the largest dams to be dismantled worldwide. Dam removal reconnected over 90% of the watershed to anadromous fish, released more than 20 megatonnes of reservoir sediment downstream, and restored natural sediment and wood transport processes. Using nine years of monitoring data spanning periods before, during, and after dam removal, we quantified changes in BMI density, taxa richness, and community composition across five river sections exposed to different combinations of sediment disturbance, reservoir succession, and fish reintroduction. Sediment release substantially altered downstream physical habitat and was accompanied by pronounced declines in BMI density and richness, particularly downstream of both dams. Density declined by up to 95% during active dam removal but rebounded to near baseline levels within three years after peak sediment transport subsided. In contrast, taxa richness and community composition remained significantly altered three years after dam removal, with persistent reductions particularly evident among Trichoptera and long-lived taxa. Fine sediment was the environmental variable most strongly associated with changes in BMI community structure. Our results demonstrate that large dam removal can cause severe but largely transient reductions in BMI abundance while producing longer-lasting changes in taxonomic diversity and community composition. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between numerical and ecological recovery and suggest that recovery trajectories following large dam removal extend well beyond the period of active sediment release.

Washington↗
USGS2026

Estimating habitat availability for Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead (O. mykiss) to inform reintroduction planning in the middle Snake River basin, USA

Anadromous fishes have been blocked from the middle Snake River basin since the construction of flood control, irrigation, and hydroelectric projects during the 19 th and 20 th centuries, culminating with the construction of Hells Canyon Dam (river kilometer [rkm] 398) in 1967. Seven large watersheds in the blocked area of the basin are under consideration for Pacific salmon reintroduction. The primary objective of this study was to identify and characterize potential reintroduction sites with high-quality rearing and spawning habitat for Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) and steelhead ( O. mykiss ) upstream of the Hells Canyon Complex in Idaho, Oregon, and Nevada, USA. We created and tested habitat models to predict rearing presence/absence, rearing abundance, and spawning presence/absence using channel morphology, hydrology, and stream temperature variables obtained from regional peer-reviewed datasets. Habitat models were trained with salmonid presence and abundance records collected in the lower Snake River basin (downstream of Hells Canyon Dam), where anadromous fish can currently access, from 1993 to 2011. Model performance was tested with set-aside data comprised of randomly selected reaches and independent environmental DNA data. An index model was created in the middle Snake River basin for each species by combining results from the habitat models. Modeling covariates differed by species and life stage and included different combinations of August stream temperature, summer flow, channel slope, and quadratic terms for temperature and slope. The habitat models predicted high versus low Chinook salmon and steelhead probability and abundance with 66% to 85% accuracy depending on species and life stage. The index models predicted a total of 2,887 km of Chinook salmon habitat and 2,434 km of steelhead habitat in the blocked area. The three basins in the blocked area with the greatest amount of predicted habitat were the Powder River, South Fork Payette River, and North Fork Payette River for Chinook salmon, and the Powder River, South Fork Boise River, and South Fork Payette River for steelhead. The modeling approach presented here is complementary to other planning efforts for Chinook salmon and steelhead reintroduction in the blocked area of the Snake River basin, and similar approaches may be useful for reintroduction planning in other systems.

Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming↗
USGS2026

Seasonal trophic dynamics drive growth potential and predation risk for reintroduced Chinook salmon in Shasta Reservoir

Reservoir ecosystems can significantly affect anadromous salmon populations reintroduced upstream of impassable high-head dams. In this study, we examine how a novel reservoir food web created by an impoundment can limit juvenile growth or survival through the seasonal production or access to food, promote competition for available resources, and affect risk of the food supply or predation mortality, all of which can be strongly influenced by the thermal regime. Shasta Reservoir, the largest impoundment in California’s Central Valley Project, presents opportunities and risks for winter-run Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ), a federally endangered population targeted for reintroduction into the McCloud River, which flows into the reservoir. We integrated field sampling, stable isotope analysis, hydroacoustic surveys, and bioenergetics modeling to characterize Shasta Reservoir’s food web and evaluate seasonal growth potential and predation risk for juvenile salmon. Zooplankton, dominated by Daphnia , provided favorable foraging conditions in spring but declined sharply by late summer, coinciding with high consumption demand from abundant threadfin shad ( Dorosoma petenense ). Bioenergetics simulations indicated that fry that would ordinarily enter the reservoir in autumn would face poor growth opportunities. They would also be exposed to elevated predation risk driven by warm temperatures and high metabolic demand, particularly from piscivorous salmonids and Sacramento pikeminnow ( Ptychocheilus grandis ). Limited information on predator abundances precludes the ability to quantify total predation demand. Alternatively, juveniles entering the reservoir the following spring would encounter greater prey availability and reduced predation pressure. These findings highlight the strong influence of seasonal thermal structure and food web dynamics on reservoir constraints and underscore the need to incorporate the dynamics of key habitats into reintroduction management and decisions. Our framework provides a quantitative, mechanistically-based approach for evaluating the role of reservoirs in salmon reintroductions above high-head dams.

California↗