Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70044312

Post-fire land treatments and wind erosion -- lessons from the Milford Flat Fire, UT, USA

Abstract

We monitored sediment flux at 25 plots located at the northern end of the 2007 Milford Flat Fire (Lake Bonneville Basin, west-central Utah) to examine the effectiveness of post-fire rehabilitation treatments in mitigating risks of wind erosion during the first 3 years post fire. Maximum values were recorded during Mar–Jul 2009 when horizontal sediment fluxes measured with BSNE samplers ranged from 16.3 to 1251.0 g m −2 d −1 in unburned plots (n = 8; data represent averages of three sampler heights per plot), 35.2–555.3 g m −2 d −1 in burned plots that were not treated (n = 5), and 21.0–44,010.7 g m −2 d −1 in burned plots that received one or more rehabilitation treatments that disturbed the soil surface (n = 12). Fluxes during this period exhibited extreme spatial variability and were contingent on upwind landscape characteristics and surficial soil properties, with maximum fluxes recorded in settings downwind of treated areas with long treatment length and unstable fine sand. Nonlinear patterns of wind erosion attributable to soil and fetch effects highlight the profound importance of landscape setting and soil properties as spatial factors to be considered in evaluating risks of alternative post-fire rehabilitation strategies. By Mar–Jul 2010, average flux for all plots declined by 73.6% relative to the comparable 2009 period primarily due to the establishment and growth of exotic annual plants rather than seeded perennial plants. Results suggest that treatments in sensitive erosion-prone settings generally exacerbated rather than mitigated wind erosion during the first 3 years post fire, although long-term effects remain uncertain.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 37° to 42° latitude; -114° to -109° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark E. Miller, Matthew A. Bowker, Richard L. Reynolds, Harland L. Goldstein. 2012. Post-fire land treatments and wind erosion -- lessons from the Milford Flat Fire, UT, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.04.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

The influence of surface crust dynamics and sediment availability on aeolian dust emission from ephemeral lake beds: Evidence from Etosha Pan, Namibia

Ephemeral lake beds (playas) are major global sources of atmospheric mineral dust, yet controls governing sediment availability and emission potential at fine spatial scales remain poorly constrained. This study presents the first in situ measurements of surface erodibility and potential PM 10 emission fluxes from Etosha Pan, Namibia. Threshold shear velocities and PM 10 emission fluxes were quantified using a Portable In-Situ Wind ERosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL) across five surface types spanning highly emissive hotspots to non-emissive consolidated salt crusts. Threshold shear velocities ranged from 0.38 m s −1 on deflated clay-rich surfaces to >1.14 m s −1 on recently inundated or cemented salt crusts, and PM 10 fluxes at u ⁎ = 0.56 m s −1 varied by more than three orders of magnitude. Emissions were highest where degraded efflorescent crusts exposed fine sediment, whereas halite-rich crusts exhibited greater mechanical strength and resisted wind erosion despite low surface moisture. X-ray diffraction analyses confirmed spatial variability in evaporite and silicate mineral assemblages, with halite abundance inversely related to dust emission potential. Antecedent hydrological conditions regulated sediment availability. Moderate wetting–drying cycles promoted weak, emissive crusts, whilst persistently wet or dry conditions were associated with continuous, resistant crusts and reduced emissions. Distinct emission regimes arose from differences in crust failure and saltation feedbacks, highlighting sub-landform-scale variability in dust sources. Crust dynamism, driven by spatial variability in surface conditions and antecedent hydrological regime, is identified as a key, under-represented control on dust emission. The relationships quantified here provide new empirical constraints for improving the representation of sediment availability in global dust modelling.

Etosha Pan↗

The Sand AbrasioN Device for Aeolian Research (SANDAR): A new experimental device for investigating how wind transport affects sand on Earth and Mars

On Earth and Mars, aeolian transport causes sand grains to become abraded, resulting in mineralogic and textural changes. Understanding how sands evolve, or mature, with transport via experimental studies is important for understanding the origins, geologic history, and cycling of sediments, as well as dust production. Previous experimental works have used a variety of methods to simulate aeolian transport in the laboratory, but practical limitations and similitude concerns have limited such research. Here, we present and validate the Sand AbrasioN Device for Aeolian Research (SANDAR), a modified air mill that uses pressurized air to circulate sand around a small abrasion chamber, simulating the effects of aeolian transport. This device is re-circulating to simulate long-distance transport, and it allows for repeated analyses of well-constrained sediment samples, revealing their evolution over time. It is compatible with the grain sizes (74–500 μm) and grain impact velocities (∼0.6–3.7 m/s) typically expected for natural aeolian environments, and is also adaptable for diverse applications simulating different wind conditions. We show that the SANDAR achieves similitude of kinetic energy with respect to saltating sand on both Earth and Mars. SEM and optical microscope imaging reveal that the SANDAR produces microtextures on the surfaces of sand grains similar to those found with natural aeolian transport, demonstrating that it effectively simulates the mechanical effects of aeolian processes. Thus, the SANDAR is a valid tool for use in experimental research to improve our understanding of sedimentary processes across the Solar System.

Aeolian Research↗

Changes in aeolian saltation cloud properties with wind speed and ripples

Aeolian sediment transport shapes landscapes on Earth and other planetary surfaces, yet key uncertainties remain in how the near-bed saltation cloud responds to changing wind and surface conditions. Leveraging recent advances in image-based particle tracking, we conducted wind tunnel experiments using high-speed imaging and Particle Tracking Velocimetry to quantify sand grain trajectories in saturated saltation clouds over both flat and rippled beds. Our open-source PTV workflow resolved particle motions within millimeters of the bed across a range of wind speeds. Supporting previous results, we find that mean particle velocities do not scale linearly with wind speed; instead, changes in particle velocity distributions—including skewness and kurtosis—emerge as wind strength and sediment flux increase. At higher transport rates, distinctions among saltation, reptation, and creep within the particle distribution become more smoothed, suggesting a continuum spectrum of particle behavior rather than discrete transport modes. Our new dataset of particle trajectories over an active rippled bed shows distinctions in particle speed across the aspects. On ripple stoss slopes, fast saltating grains co-occur with slow creeping particles, while lee slopes are depleted of slower grains, consistent with shadowing effects. These observations support a feedback between ripple morphology and near-bed particle trajectories, with implications for how splash events redistribute sediment momentum. This study contributes new high-resolution empirical data that illuminate how saltation cloud structure evolves with wind forcing and bedform development, advancing our understanding of aeolian sediment transport under complex, dynamic conditions.

Aeolian Research↗