Genetic comparison of naturally spawned and artificially propagated Lake Ontario lake trout fry: Evaluation of a stocking strategy for species rehabilitation

Abstract

Two strategies have been used in the effort to restore lake trout Salvelinus namaycush to Lake Ontario. First, lake trout strains from multiple wild and hatchery sources have been stocked to maximize genetic variability in the lake, Second, a unique hatchery “strain” of fish to be stocked was created each year with gametes collected from adult, hatchery‐origin fish that had survived to maturity after being stocked into Lake Ontario. Several hatchery strains may be represented among the adults captured and used to propagate this unique strain, termed the “Ontario strain.” The “Ontario strain” may have a genetically based potential for enhanced survival over other strains stocked in Lake Ontario because it is composed of the progeny of fish that have survived from the yearling to the adult life stage, Unlike naturally spawned fish, however, the “Ontario strain” has been shielded from natural selection during the critical period of mortality from spawning through the first year of life, The purpose of this study was to determine whether the “Ontario strain” was genetically representative of the wild fry produced in the lake, We examined the strain composition of three year‐classes of wild‐caught fry and six year‐classes of the “Ontario strain” using allozyme data with mixed‐stock analysis. The hatchery and wild fry were genetically dissimilar. In addition, the composition of the “Ontario strain” changed from predominantly Seneca strain in 1983–1984 to predominantly Superior and Killala strains from 1983 to 1989. Mixed‐stock estimates indicated that in contrast to the hatchery‐reared fry, strain composition of wildcaught fry did not vary greatly from year to year. Progeny of Seneca × Seneca crosses were the predominant fry in the three year‐classes of wild fry. The genetic dissimilarity between the “Ontario strain” fry and wild‐caught fry could be caused by differential mortality among the wild fry between spawning and fry emergence or by differential vulnerability of strains to the gill‐net sampling used to capture adults for gamete collection. Based on these results, the development of a new hatchery brood stock from wild‐caught fry is recommended as an alternative to the collection and propagation of gametes from mature hatchery‐origin lake trout. In addition, the composition of the hatchery strains stocked should be altered to emphasize those strains that reproduce successfully. Both options should be considered in order to speed the rehabilitation process.