Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 1003051

A comparison of solids collected in sediment traps and automated water samplers

Abstract

Sediment traps are being used in some pollution monitoring programs in the USA to sample suspended solids for contaminant analyses. This monitoring approach assumes that the characteristics of solids obtained in sediment traps are the same as those collected in whole-water sampling devices. We tested this assumption in the upper Mississippi River, based on the inorganic particle-size distribution (determined with a laser particle-analyzer) and volatile matter content of solids (a Surrogate for organic matter). Cylindrical sediment traps (aspect ratio 3) were attached to a rigid mooring device and deployed in a flowing side channel in Navigation Pool 7 of the upper Mississippi River. On each side of the mooring device, a trap was situated adjacent to a port of an autosampler that collected raw water samples hourly to form 2-d composite samples. Paired samples (one trap and one raw water, composite sample) were removed from each end of the mooring device at 2-d intervals during the 30-d study period and compared. The relative particle collection efficiency of paired samples did not vary temporally. Particle-size distributions of inorganic solids from sediment traps and water samples were not significantly different. The volatile matter content of solids was lesser in sediment traps (mean, 9.5%) than in corresponding water samples (mean, 22.7%). This bias may have been partly due to under-collection of phytoplankton (mainly cyanobacteria), which were abundant in the water column during the study. The poisoning of water samplers and sediment traps in the mooring device did not influence the particle-size distribution or total solids of samples. We observed a small difference in the amount of organic matter collected by water samplers situated at opposite ends of the mooring device.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L.A. Bartsch, R.G. Rada, J.F. Sullivan. 1996. A comparison of solids collected in sediment traps and automated water samplers. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00020547

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Long-term predictive modeling of stream condition suggests wide-spread changes within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA

Stream ecosystems worldwide face ongoing degradation, underscoring the urgent need for conservation and restoration. Regional analyses of stream condition have been limited by sparse spatial and temporal data, particularly at long time scales. To address this gap, we used observed data to predict annual biological condition for 360,893 small, nontidal stream reaches in the Chesapeake Bay watershed from 1985 to 2023 (39 years). Predictions were generated using random forest models trained on extensive benthic macroinvertebrate data sets and predictors including natural landscape features, land cover, and climate variables. Four biological metrics were assessed: percent Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera excluding Hydropsychidae (EPT-H), percent Ephemeroptera, percent clinger functional group, and the Index of Biological Integrity (IBI). Results revealed degraded biological conditions near Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, Maryland, with declining trends across all metrics in these urbanized areas. Spatial heterogeneity was evident: IBI and clinger percentages increased in many southern streams but declined in northern streams, whereas EPT-H and Ephemeroptera decreased watershed wide except in the Southeastern Plains bioregion. By 2021, watershed wide IBI improvements were predicted for 0.9–1.1% of stream length, falling short of management goals. This study demonstrates the utility of long-term data and machine learning for predicting stream condition, identifying key stressors, and guiding restoration and conservation site selection.

Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virgin↗

Understanding co-invading species’ ecological strategies and interactions with causal inference and simple dynamic models: Bighead (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and Silver carp (H. molitrix) in the Illinois River, USA

Species interactions among multiple invasive species can present hidden challenges for management and eradication efforts. Bighead and Silver carp ( Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and H. molitrix , respectively) are closely related species that have co-invaded the Mississippi River and many of its tributaries, including the Illinois River. We used a combination of causal inference and dynamic models to test for interspecific interactions in a 10-year data set of hydroacoustic density data from the Illinois River. The results suggest that Bighead and Silver carp are exploiting different ecological strategies; where Bighead carp shows fast initial growth but low equilibrium density and Silver carp had a lower low-density growth rate but larger equilibrium population density. Further, we found evidence for a positive interspecific effect of Silver carp on Bighead carp. The mechanism leading to the observed positive interactions is unknown, but could be an effect of ecological facilitation, differential responses to harvest of both species, or hybridization and introgression. Finally, while these results provide valuable information in the ecological strategies and relationships between these species, simulations of the resulting models suggest that the magnitude of the positive interaction is likely too small to be exploited for innovative multispecies management interventions.

Illinois↗

Spatial and temporal drivers of variability in abundance of two stream fishes

An understanding of how and why animal populations vary in space and time informs effective conservation and management. We used spatial and temporal flow metrics to explore flow-ecology relationships for two fish species, Mountain Sucker Pantosteus platyrhynchus (Cope, 1874) and Mottled Sculpin Cottus bairdii Girard, 1850, across 64 sites and 8 years in Wyoming, U.S.A. We found variation in Mottled Sculpin and Mountain Sucker abundance was driven to a greater extent by spatial flow metrics (e.g., drainage area, median summer flow) with differing direction of response between species. The opposing responses to spatial variation in median summer flow could reflect the ability of Mountain Sucker to persist in non-perennial habitats, likely due to their relatively high mobility and recolonization capacity. Responses to temporal flow metrics (e.g., previous year spring flow, previous year autumn flow) were weaker but consistent across species likely due to similar reproductive strategies and timing. The lack of stronger flow effects on population variability in both species likely corresponds to high variability in local habitat characteristics that are mediating population response. These findings underscore how considering spatial context informs conservation planning and suggest that flow-ecology relationships may be mediated by species-specific traits and local habitat conditions.

Wyoming↗