Geology ReportsSearch

SEARCH · Geology Reports

Results for “Smart Agricultural Technology”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-sensor proximal remote sensing for cover crop biomass estimation at high and moderate spatial resolutions

Cover crops play a critical role in providing agroecological services such as improving soil health, reducing erosion and nitrogen loss, and suppressing weeds, which are closely tied to their performance such as accumulated biomass. This study evaluated the Active Canopy Sensor (ACS) -214, an active proximal sensing device equipped with its own light-emitting red and near-infrared spectral reflectance sensors, a time-of-flight laser, and an ultrasonic sensor, for estimating winter cover crop biomass across 13 U.S. states from 2020 to 2024. We assessed 11 species from three functional groups – grasses ( n = 797), legumes ( n = 264), and brassicas ( n = 181) – using Random Forest (RF) models and four cross-validation strategies. The ACS-214 showed moderate to strong prediction accuracy for grasses ( R 2 = 0.51 – 0.64) and legumes ( R 2 = 0.44 – 0.76), though performance declined in leave-one-region-out analyses ( R 2 = 0.06 – 0.46), indicating limited spatial generalizability. Brassica models had low prediction accuracy for all models ( R 2 < 0.30), likely due to flowering and patchy growth. Biomass prediction breakpoints were observed at ∼3000 kg ha −1 for legumes and ∼4000 kg ha −1 for grasses. We also evaluated the effectiveness of using ACS-214 data to train Sentinel-2 satellite imagery for estimating grass cover crop biomass using withheld, out of bag data from 2023 to 2024. Sentinel-2 RF models trained with ACS-214 data showed good agreement with field-sampled ( R 2 = 0.58 – 0.61) and ACS-214-estimated biomass ( R 2 = 0.70). While Sentinel-2 offers scalability, the ACS-214 enables finer-resolution biomass mapping and better accounts for within-field variability, making it an effective tool for localized management and monitoring. These findings support the integration of proximal and satellite sensing approaches to enhance cover crop biomass estimation and agroecological assessment.

Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland,

A comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and ITS metabarcoding

Taxonomic identification of pollen has historically been accomplished via light microscopy but requires specialized knowledge and reference collections, particularly when identification to lower taxonomic levels is necessary. Recently, next-generation sequencing technology has been used as a cost-effective alternative for identifying bee-collected pollen; however, this novel approach has not been tested on a spatially or temporally robust number of pollen samples. Here, we compare pollen identification results derived from light microscopy and DNA sequencing techniques with samples collected from honey bee colonies embedded within a gradient of intensive agricultural landscapes in the Northern Great Plains throughout the 2010–2011 growing seasons. We demonstrate that at all taxonomic levels, DNA sequencing was able to discern a greater number of taxa, and was particularly useful for the identification of infrequently detected species. Importantly, substantial phenological overlap did occur for commonly detected taxa using either technique, suggesting that DNA sequencing is an appropriate, and enhancing, substitutive technique for accurately capturing the breadth of bee-collected species of pollen present across agricultural landscapes. We also show that honey bees located in high and low intensity agricultural settings forage on dissimilar plants, though with overlap of the most abundantly collected pollen taxa. We highlight practical applications of utilizing sequencing technology, including addressing ecological issues surrounding land use, climate change, importance of taxa relative to abundance, and evaluating the impact of conservation program habitat enhancement efforts.

Environmental Entomology