Geology ReportsSearch

SEARCH · Geology Reports

Search Geology Reports

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,748 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

Mica

No abstract available.

Mining Engineering

Vanadium

No abstract available.

Mining Engineering

Gemstones

No abstract available.

Mining Engineering

Strontium

No abstract available.

Mining Engineering

Sedimentary exhalative (sedex) zinc-lead-silver deposit model

This report draws on previous syntheses and basic research studies of sedimentary exhalative (sedex) deposits to arrive at the defining criteria, both descriptive and genetic, for sedex-type deposits. Studies of the tectonic, sedimentary, and fluid evolution of modern and ancient sedimentary basins have also been used to select defining criteria. The focus here is on the geologic characteristics of sedex deposit-hosting basins that contain greater than 10 million metric tons of zinc and lead. The enormous size of sedex deposits strongly suggests that basin-scale geologic processes are involved in their formation. It follows that mass balance constraints of basinal processes can provide a conceptual underpinning for the evaluation of potential ore-forming mechanisms and the identification of geologic indicators for ore potential in specific sedimentary basins. Empirical data and a genetic understanding of the physicochemical, geologic, and mass balance conditions required for each of these elements are used to establish a hierarchy of quantifiable geologic criteria that can be used in U.S. Geological Survey national assessments. In addition, this report also provides a comprehensive evaluation of environmental considerations associated with the mining of sedex deposits.

Scientific Investigations Report

Development of vegetation based soil quality indices for mineralized terrane in arid and semi-arid regions

Soil quality indices (SQIs) are often management driven and attempt to describe key relationships between above- and below-ground parameters. In terrestrial systems, indices that were initially developed and modified for agroecosystems have been applied to non-agricultural systems in increasing number. We develop an SQI in arid and semi-arid ecosystems of the Western US impacted by different types of geologic mineralization using the relationship between vegetation community parameters and soil abiotic and biotic properties. We analyze these relations in soils associated with three different mineralization types: podiform chromite, Cu/Mo porphyry, and acid-sulfate gold vein systems at four different sites in California and Nevada. Soil samples were collected from undisturbed soils in both mineralized and nearby unmineralized substrates as well as from waste rock and tailings. Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), canopy cover and shrub density were measured for the vegetative communities. Minimum data sets were developed based on correlations between the soil and vegetation parameters, refined using principal components analysis, scored using non-linear functions, and combined into an overall SQI. The indices are comprised of one or two microbial parameters and three to six abiotic parameters, the latter consisting of nutrients and metals. Given the preliminary development of this approach, the parameters and combinations to arrive at an SQI for a given site cannot at this time be correlated or compared with that of another site. This SQI approach provides a means of quantifying disturbed ecosystem recovery resulting from mining, and could be applied to other disturbances in a way that readily distills the information for potential use by land managers. However, severely disturbed areas with little to no aboveground biomass, such as unreclaimed tailings, have likely crossed an ecological threshold that precludes the use of this type of monitoring tool.

California

Divisions of geologic time—Major chronostratigraphic and geochronologic units

Effective communication in the geosciences requires consistent uses of stratigraphic nomenclature, especially divisions of geologic time. A geologic time scale is composed of standard stratigraphic divisions based on rock sequences and is calibrated in years. Over the years, the development of new dating methods and the refinement of previous methods have stimulated revisions to geologic time scales. Advances in stratigraphy and geochronology require that any time scale be periodically updated. Therefore, Divisions of Geologic Time, which shows the major chronostratigraphic (position) and geochronologic (time) units, is intended to be a dynamic resource that will be modified to include accepted changes of unit names and boundary age estimates. This fact sheet is a modification of USGS Fact Sheet 2007-3015 by the U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Names Committee.

Fact Sheet

Geology and geochemistry of Jurassic plutonic rocks, Baboquivari Mountains, south-central Arizona

Among the plutons of the Jurassic magmatic arc segment in southern Arizona, northern Sonora, and southern California, two distinctive rock types dominate, occurring together in numerous mountain ranges: porphyritic, titanite-bearing hornblende-biotite granodiorite; and biotite leucogranite. These characteristic rocks are particularly well preserved and well exposed around Kitt Peak, in the Baboquivari Mountains, southern Arizona. The Middle to early Late Jurassic Kitt Peak Plutonic Suite (KPPS) comprises three units: Aguirre Peak Quartz Diorite (APQD;<170 Ma, >=165 Ma, U-Pb), chiefly hornblende mesodiorite; Kitt Peak Granodiorite (KPGD; 165 Ma), hornblende-biotite granodiorite and monzogranite; and Pavo Kug Granite (PKG; 159 Ma), equigranular biotite leucogranite. This range also hosts a fourth, regionally unusual, Jurassic plutonic unit: the Baboquivari Peak Perthite Granite, related to post-arc, Late Jurassic crustal extension. Binary variation diagrams, incompatible element patterns, and REE spectra indicate APQD and KPGD are consanguineous. APQD basaltic mesodiorite evidently approximates the parental magma for the APQD–KPGD series. More evolved rocks of this series evidently formed by combinations of fractional crystallization and mixing with or assimilation of crustal material. PKG is less directly related to APQD and KPGD than these two are to one another.

Arizona, Sonora

Late Jurassic igneous rocks in south-central Arizona and north-central Sonora: Magmatic accompaniment of crustal extension

In Middle Jurassic time, the region of south-central Arizona and north-central Sonora was part of a continental magmatic arc. In early Late Jurassic time, this magmatic arc gradually gave way to a extensional regime. Late Jurassic rifting was accompanied by magmatism, typically small in volume relative to the preceding arc phase, and with mildly alkaline compositions. These igneous rocks, the 158- to 146-Ma Ko Vaya Suite, make up much or most of the Comobabi, Artesa, Quijotoa, and Brownell Mountains and Sierra del Cobre. The bimodal Ko Vaya Suite constitutes volcanic to shallow plutonic complexes comprising chiefly trachyandesite and volcanic wacke; monzodiorite; rhyolite porphyry; distinctive, compositionally and texturally heterogeneous, quartzpoor granite (the Ko Vaya Granite); A-type perthite granite and quartz syenite; aphyric intrusive rhyolite; and locally abundant hematite veins. Alteration, particularly potassic alteration, is widespread. Minimally altered samples of granite and quartz syenite have the composition of trachyte or trachydacite and alkali rhyolite. The Ko Vaya Suite is nonconformably overlain by the latest Jurassic Sand Wells Formation, approximately correlative with the Glance Conglomerate, the basal unit of the Bisbee Group. The Ko Vaya Suite is in some ways analogous to the coeval Independence dike swarm of eastern California, but less diffuse. We infer that the Ko Vaya Suite represents especially intense or focused Late Jurassic extensional magmatism.

Arizona, Sonora

Divisions of geologic time—Major chronostratigraphic and geochronologic units

Effective communication in the geosciences requires consistent uses of stratigraphic nomenclature, especially divisions of geologic time. A geologic time scale is composed of standard stratigraphic divisions based on rock sequences and calibrated in years. Over the years, the development of new dating methods and refinement of previous ones have stimulated revisions to geologic time scales. Since the mid-1990s, geologists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), State geological surveys, academia, and other organizations have sought a consistent time scale to be used in communicating ages of geologic units in the United States. Many international debates have occurred over names and boundaries of units, and various time scales have been used by the geoscience community. For consistency purposes, the USGS Geologic Names Committee and the Association of American State Geologists developed Divisions of Geologic Time .

Fact Sheet