Geology ReportsSearch

SEARCH · Geology Reports

Results for “Washington Geology”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

Geologic Map of the Woodland Quadrangle, Clark and Cowlitz Counties, Washington

The Woodland 7.5' quadrangle is situated in the Puget-Willamette Lowland approximately 50 km north of Portland, Oregon (fig. 1). The lowland, which extends from Puget Sound into west-central Oregon, is a complex structural and topographic trough that lies between the Coast Range and the Cascade Range. Since late Eocene time, the Cascade Range has been the locus of an active volcanic arc associated with underthrusting of oceanic lithosphere beneath the North American continent along the Cascadia Subduction Zone. The Coast Range occupies the forearc position within the Cascadia arc-trench system and consists of a complex assemblage of Eocene to Miocene volcanic and marine sedimentary rocks. The Woodland quadrangle lies at the northern edge of the Portland Basin, a roughly 2000-km2 topographic and structural depression that is the northernmost of several sediment-filled structural basins, which collectively constitute the Willamette Valley segment of the Puget-Willamette Lowland (Beeson and others, 1989; Swanson and others, 1993; Yeats and others, 1996). The Portland Basin is approximately 70 km long and 30 km wide; its long dimension is oriented northwest. Its northern boundary coincides, in part, with the lower Lewis River, which flows westward through the center of the quadrangle. The Lewis drains a large area in the southern Washington Cascade Range, including the southern flank of Mount St. Helens approximately 25 km upstream from the quadrangle, and joins the Columbia River about 6 km south of Woodland (fig. 1). Northwest of Woodland, the Columbia River exits the broad floodplain of the Portland Basin and flows northward through a relatively narrow bedrock valley at an elevation near sea level. The flanks of the Portland Basin consist of Eocene through Miocene volcanic and sedimentary rocks that rise to elevations exceeding 2000 ft (610 m). Seismic-reflection profiles (L.M. Liberty, written commun., 2003) and lithologic logs of water wells (Swanson and others, 1993; Mabey and Madin, 1995) indicate that as much as 550 m of late Miocene and younger sediments have accumulated in the deepest part of the basin near Vancouver. Most of this basin-fill material was carried in from the east by the Columbia River but sediment deposited by streams draining the adjacent highlands are locally important. The Portland Basin has been interpreted as a pull-apart basin located in the releasing stepover between two en echelon, northwest-striking, right-lateral fault zones (Beeson and others, 1985, 1989; Beeson and Tolan, 1990; Yelin and Patton, 1991; Blakely and others, 1995). These fault zones are thought to reflect regional transpression and dextral shear within the forearc in response to oblique subduction of the Pacific Plate along the Cascadia Subduction Zone (Pezzopane and Weldon, 1993; Wells and others, 1998). The southwestern margin of the Portland Basin is a well-defined topographic break along the base of the Tualatin Mountains, an asymmetric anticlinal ridge that is bounded on its northeast flank by the Portland Hills Fault Zone (Balsillie and Benson, 1971; Beeson and others, 1989; Blakely and others, 1995), which is probably an active structure (Wong and others, 2001; Liberty and others, 2003). The nature of the corresponding northeastern margin of the basin is less clear, but a poorly defined and partially buried dextral extensional fault zone has been hypothesized from topography, microseismicity, potential field-anomalies, and reconnaissance geologic mapping (Beeson and others, 1989; Beeson and Tolan, 1990; Yelin and Patton, 1991; Blakely and others, 1995). Another dextral structure may control the north-northwest-trending reach of the Columbia River between Portland and Longview (Blakely and others, 1995; Evarts, 2002; Evarts and others, 2002). This map is a contribution to a U.S. Geological Survey program designed to improve the geologic database for the Portland Basin part of the Pacific Northwest urban corridor,

Scientific Investigations Map

Sediment and chemical contaminant loads in tributaries to the Anacostia River, Washington, District of Columbia, 2016–17

A study was conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the Washington, D.C., Department of Energy & Environment to estimate the loads of suspended-sediment-bound chemical compounds in five gaged tributaries and four ungaged tributaries of the Anacostia River (known locally as “Lower Anacostia River”) in Washington, D.C. Tributaries whose discharge is measured by the USGS are the Northeast and Northwest Branches of the Anacostia River, referred to in this report as “Northeast Branch” (NEB) and “Northwest Branch” (NWB), respectively; Watts Branch (WB); and Hickey Run (HR). A USGS streamflow-gaging station was established in 2016 on Beaverdam Creek (known locally as “Lower Beaverdam Creek” [LBDC]) to support this study. The ungaged streams studied include Nash Run; Pope Branch; an unnamed stream at Fort DuPont, referred to in this report as “Fort DuPont Creek”; and an unnamed stream at Fort Stanton, referred to in this report as “Fort Stanton Creek.” The gaged streams were sampled during four to five storms and two low-flow events during January, March, May, and July 2017. The ungaged streams were sampled during one storm and one low-flow event during July 2017. Storm sampling involved collecting large-volume (60- to 70-liter) composite samples, then removing sediment by filtration in the laboratory. Low-flow samples were obtained by filtering streamwater directly in the field. Continuously recording data sondes were deployed throughout the study to measure turbidity and other water-quality characteristics. During sampling, multiple discrete samples of streamwater were collected to determine suspended-sediment concentration (SSC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) concentration. Shortly after each storm, bed sediment was collected for chemical analysis. Sediment samples were analyzed for 209 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners; 35 polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds, including 20 nonalkylated and 15 alkylated species; and 20 organochlorine pesticide (OP) compounds. Sediment from one storm was analyzed for 23 metals. Relations were developed among turbidity, discharge, and measured SSC by using multiple linear regression of log-transformed data. These relations were used to estimate SSC from continuous records of discharge and turbidity and were subsequently used to estimate sediment loads for the 2017 calendar year. USGS continuous records of turbidity in NEB, NWB, Watts Branch, and Hickey Run were available for 2013–17, which allowed sediment loads to be calculated for these years. Sediment loads for the ungaged streams were estimated by using loads measured in Watts Branch adjusted on the basis of stream-basin areas. Sediment loads for 2017 total 3.10×10 7 kilograms (kg), with 1.02×107 kg (33 percent of total) from the NEB, 1.55×10 7 kg (50 percent) from the NWB, 4.45×10 6 kg (14 percent) from LBDC, 5.62×10 5 kg (2 percent) from Watts Branch, and 2.82×10 5 kg (1 percent) from Hickey Run. Sediment yields were highest from NWB and LBDC (3.13×10 5 kilograms per year per square mile [kg/yr/mi 2 ] and 3.01 kg/yr/mi 2 , respectively). As a result of gaps in turbidity and discharge data, the load for LBDC reported here was calculated from measurements representing only 88 percent of the year (2017), and thus underestimates the actual load. All other gaged tributaries had datasets covering 100 percent of the year and are considered to fully represent actual loads. Estimated sediment loads for the ungaged streams during 2017 total 3.5×10 5 kg, with 1.2×10 5 kg from Nash Run, 6.2×10 4 kg from Pope Branch, 1.1×10 5 kg from Fort DuPont Creek, and 5.6×10 4 kg from Fort Stanton Creek. Concentrations of PCBs, PAHs, and chlorinated pesticides in streamwater are presented for stormflow and low-flow conditions. Average concentrations (in stormflow and low-flow samples) of total PCBs (sum of all congeners, including coelutions) are 5.9 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) for NEB, 6.6 µg/kg for NWB, 130 µg/kg for LBDC, 34 µg/kg for Watts Branch, and 69 µg/kg for Hickey Run. Average concentrations of total PAHs (tPAH) (total of nonalkylated and alkylated species) are 2,000 µg/kg for NEB, 3,300 µg/kg for NWB, 2,200 µg/kg for LBDC, 2,400 µg/kg for Watts Branch, and 18,000 µg/kg for Hickey Run. tPAH concentrations among the ungaged streams were highest in Nash Run (5,500 µg/kg); concentrations in the other ungaged streams were less than (<) 700 µg/kg. The general magnitude of tPCB and tPAH concentrations in streamwater samples was low-flow samples greater than (>) stormflow samples greater than or equal to (≥) bed-sediment samples. PCB congener profiles in the three types of samples were nearly identical in each stream and were similar in all streams except for LBDC, where the dominant PCBs shifted to the lighter di- through tetra- homologs. LBDC showed higher tPCB concentrations and a distinct congener profile from the other streams. The similarity in congener makeup supported that averaging PCB concentrations in stormflow and low-flow samples was appropriate for calculating chemical loads. Loads of tPCB, tPAH (total of alkylated and nonalkylated forms), and pesticides were estimated for each stream by multiplying average contaminant concentrations by the respective sediment loads. Total PCB loads for 2017 were estimated to be 820 grams (g) with 8 percent (60 g) from NEB, 12 percent (95 g) from NWB, 75 percent (590 g) from LBDC, 3 percent (25 g) from Watts Branch, and 2.5 percent (19 g) from Hickey Run. PCB toxicity totaled 3.8×10 −3 µg/kg, with the largest contribution (47 percent) derived from LBDC. Total PAH loads (sum of alkylated and nonalkylated forms) for 2017 were estimated to be 89,000 g, with 23 percent (20,000 g) from NEB, 59 percent (52,000 g) from NWB, 11 percent (9,800 g) from LBDC, 2 percent (1,400 g) from Watts Branch, and 6 percent (5,200 g) from Hickey Run. These results indicate that the largest contributor (75 percent) of PCBs to the Anacostia River is LBDC, although it contributes only 15 percent of the sediment and its basin area represents only 10 percent of the area of the Anacostia River watershed. The majority of the PAH load originates from NWB (59 percent of total) and NEB (22 percent). The ungaged tributaries contribute extremely small loads of PCBs and PAHs, totaling 8.1 g and 765 kg, respectively. More than 94 percent of the total load from the ungaged tributaries is derived from the Nash Run Basin. Various organochlorine pesticides were present in suspended and bed sediment from all gaged and ungaged tributaries; however, elevated detection levels associated with the analytical methods resulted in numerous unquantifiable concentrations in the suspended-sediment samples. Only the pesticide chlordane was found in measurable concentrations in all gaged tributaries. As a result, in this report, a combination of analytical data from suspended-sediment and bed-sediment samples was used to estimate the maximum pesticide loading for each tributary. Chlordane was the principal compound present in the gaged tributaries; the highest average concentration (average of stormflow and low-flow samples from each stream) was 62 µg/kg in sediment from Watts Branch. Chlordane loads for 2017 totaled 1,100 g, of which 7 percent (430 g) was from NEB, 28 percent (320 g) was from NWB, 28 percent (310 g) was from LBDC, 5 percent (56 g) was from Watts Branch, and 1 percent (11 g) was from Hickey Run. Chlordane was not present in suspended or bed sediment from any of the ungaged tributaries. Loads of the other pesticides were estimated by using the highest concentration measured in the combined suspended-sediment and bed-sediment data for each stream. Notable loads include dieldrin (860 g from NWB), methoxychlor (205 g from LBDC), endrin aldehyde (150 g from NWB), and 4,4-DDT (79 g from Watts Branch). Compared with pesticide loads from the gaged streams, those from the ungaged streams were minimal, with only the Pope Branch contribution exceeding 1 gram per year for 4,4-DDE (1.05 g) and 4,4’-DDT (1.3 g). The results of this study show that the dominant source of PCBs and chlordane is LBDC, despite its relatively small basin area. PAHs are ubiquitous throughout the study area, with the largest sources being NEB and NWB; this finding is a result of the large sediment load originating from these basins. The small, ungaged streams supply only minimal PCB and PAH loads, with Nash Run being the largest contributor.

District of Columbia

Ages of rocks in southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon as indicated by paleontological and isotopic dates

This report presents a compilation of 1,019 paleontologic dates and 301 isotopic dates of rocks in southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon. The study area extends from Portland, Oregon (latitude 45°30' N.) to Bellevue, Washington (latitude 47°35' N.) and from the east flank of the Cascade Range (longitude 121°20' W.) to the coastline (longitude approximately 124°00' W.). The data are presented in two tables and come from previous summaries of isotopic ages, open-file reports, published papers and maps, and theses. Parke D. Snavely, Jr. of the U.S. Geological Survey and Weldon W. Rau of the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources (WDGER) generously allowed us access to files and records of more than 40 years of micropaleontological research in western Washington and Oregon. We also present unpublished data from our research since 1971 in northwestern Oregon. This compilation was undertaken for the southwestern Washington and northwestern Oregon project of the U.S. Geological Survey Evolution of Sedimentary Basins Program.

Oregon, Washington

Geology and geologic history of the Moscow-Pullman basin, Idaho and Washington, from late Grande Ronde to late Saddle Mountains time

The Moscow-Pullman basin, located on the eastern margin of the Columbia River flood basalt province, consists of a subsurface mosaic of interlayered Miocene sediments and lava flows of the Imnaha, Grande Ronde, Wanapum, and Saddle Mountains Basalts of the Columbia River Basalt Group. This sequence is ~1800 ft (550 m) thick in the east around Moscow, Idaho, and exceeds 2300 ft (700 m) in the west at Pullman, Washington. Most flows entered from the west into a topographic low, partially surrounded by steep mountainous terrain. These flows caused a rapid rise in base level and deposition of immature sediments. This field guide focuses on the upper Grande Ronde Basalt, Wanapum Basalt, and sediments of the Latah Formation. Late Grande Ronde flows terminated midway into the basin to begin the formation of a topographic high that now separates a thick sediment wedge of the Vantage Member to the east of the high from a thin layer to the west. Disrupted by lava flows, streams were pushed from a west-flowing direction to a north-northwest orientation and drained the basin through a gap between steptoes toward Palouse, Washington. Emplacement of the Roza flow of the Wanapum Basalt against the western side of the topographic high was instrumental in this process, plugging west-flowing drainages and increasing deposition of Vantage sediments east of the high. The overlying basalt of Lolo covered both the Roza flow and Vantage sediments, blocking all drainages, and was in turn covered by sediments interlayered with local Saddle Mountains Basalt flows. Reestablishment of west-flowing drainages has been slow. The uppermost Grande Ronde, the Vantage, and the Wanapum contain what is known as the upper aquifer. The water supply is controlled, in part, by thickness, composition, and distribution of the Vantage sediments. A buried channel of the Vantage likely connects the upper aquifer to Palouse, Washington, outside the basin. This field guide locates outcrops; relates them to stratigraphic well data; outlines paleogeographic basin evolution from late Grande Ronde to the present time; and notes structures, basin margin differences, and features that influence upper aquifer water supply.

Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Washington

Beach morphology monitoring in the Columbia River Littoral Cell: 1997-2005

This report describes methods used, data collected, and results of the Beach Morphology Monitoring Program in the Columbia River Littoral Cell (CRLC) from 1997 to 2005. A collaborative group primarily consisting of the US Geological Survey and the Washington State Department of Ecology performed this work. Beach Monitoring efforts consisted of collecting topographic and bathymetric horizontal and vertical position data using a Real Time Kinematic Differential Global Positioning System (RTK-DGPS). Sediment size distribution data was also collected as part of this effort. The monitoring program was designed to: 1) quantify the short- to medium-term (seasonal to interannual) beach change rates and morphological variability along the CRLC and assess the processes responsible for these changes; 2) collect beach state data (i.e., grain size, beach slope, and dune/sandbar height/position) to enhance the conceptual understanding of CRLC functioning and refine predictions of future coastal change and hazards; 3) compare and contrast the scales of environmental forcing and beach morphodynamics in the CRLC to other coastlines of the world; and 4) provide beach change data in a useful format to land use managers.

Oregon, Washington

Beach morphology monitoring in the Elwha River Littoral Cell, 2004-2009

This report describes the methods used, data collected, and results of the Beach Morphology Monitoring Program in the Elwha River Littoral Cell, starting in 2004. The U.S. Geological Survey and the Washington State Department of Ecology collaborated in the data collection with the support of the local Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. Beach monitoring efforts consisted of collecting topographic and bathymetric horizontal and vertical position data by using a Real Time Kinematic Differential Global Positioning System (RTK-DGPS). The monitoring program was designed to characterize the littoral system of the Elwha River before the scheduled removal of two large dams in 2012. A primary objective of this work is to quantitatively describe the topography and bathymetry of the Elwha River littoral system so that the effects of dam removal may be quantified. Sediment inputs following dam removal are hypothesized to result in (A) larger amounts of fine sediment grain-sizes entering the littoral system and, (B) a reduction or reversal of coastal erosion.

Washington

Famous building stones of our Nation's capital

The buildings of our Nation's Capital are constructed with rocks from quarries located throughout the United States and many distant lands. The earliest Government buildings, however, were constructed with stones from nearby sources because it was too difficult and expensive to move heavy materials such as stone any great distance without the aid of modern transportation methods, including large cargo ships, trains, and trucks. This fact sheet describes the source and appearance of three frequently used local stones employed in building Washington, D.C., and the geologic environment in which they were formed.

Washington D.C.

Geologic map of the Wenatchee 1:100,000 Quadrangle, central Washington

The rocks and deposits within the Wenatchee quadrangle can be grouped into six generalized units: (1) Precambrian(?) Swakane Biotite Gneiss in the northeastern part of the quadrangle and the probable Jurassic low-grade metamorphic suite, mostly composed of the Easton Schist, in the southwestern part; (2) the Mesozoic Ingalls Tectonic Complex; (3) the Mesozoic Mount Stuart batholith; (4) lower and middle Tertiary nonmarine sedimentary and volcanic rocks; (5) Miocene basalt flows and interbedded epiclastic rocks constituting part of the Columbia River Basalt Group and interbedded silicic volcaniclastic rocks of the Ellensburg Formation; and (6) Pliocene to Holocene alluvium, glacial, flood, and mass-wastage deposits.

IMAP