Estimation of magnitude and frequency of floods for rural, unregulated streams in and near Virginia and West Virginia

Terence Messinger; James M. Duda; Daniel M. Wagner; Padraic S. O’Shea; James D. Scott; Chintamani Kandel

doi:10.3133/sir20255110

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · sir20255110

Estimation of magnitude and frequency of floods for rural, unregulated streams in and near Virginia and West Virginia

Terence Messinger·James M. Duda·Daniel M. Wagner·Padraic S. O’Shea·James D. Scott·Chintamani Kandel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Magnitude and frequency of annual peak streamflows were computed for 813 streamgages on rural, unregulated streams with annual peak streamflow data from 1791 through the 2021 water years in and near Virginia and West Virginia. The study was done in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the West Virginia Department of Transportation, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Regression equations were developed for estimating flood frequency and magnitude. Twelve regions with homogeneous flood characteristics were identified. Generalized least squares regression equations relating logarithmic-transformed drainage area and peak streamflow were developed for the 0.5, 0.2, 0.1, 0.04, 0.02, 0.01, 0.005, and 0.002 annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs). Drainage area was the only significant variable for all equations. The range of drainage areas used to develop the equations differed for each region; the smallest drainage area in any region was 0.21 square miles (mi 2 ) and the largest drainage area in any region is 2,966 mi 2 . Pseudo coefficient of determination (pseudo- R 2 ) values for regression equations ranged from 0.481 to 0.995 for all regions and AEPs. Performance metrics and diagnostic plots indicated that equations for 11 of the 12 regions showed generally good performance, with pseudo- R 2 values ranging from 0.762 to 0.968 for the 0.01 AEP. The overall average change in at-site 0.01 AEP annual peak streamflows at individual streamgages was 0.5 percent compared to the most recent 2011 Virginia study and 2.3 percent compared to the most recent 2010 West Virginia study. Changes from the previous studies for estimates from regional equations for the 0.01 AEP, solved specifically for a 50 mi 2 basin, ranged from a 30 percent increase to a 45 percent decrease in areas where the previous regions overlapped with the current regions by 750 mi 2 or more. New regional skews were developed using Bayesian weighted least-squares/Bayesian generalized least-squares regression for two skew regions that included the study area. A constant regional skew of 0.50 was computed for streams in Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland that drain to the Atlantic Ocean. A constant regional skew of 0.048 was computed for streams that drain to the Gulf of America, including streams in Kentucky and Tennessee, most of West Virginia, far southwestern Virginia, and part of western Maryland. About 12 percent of the 418 streamgages with 30 or more gaged peaks had statistically significant (p-value [significance level] less than or equal to 0.05) trends, with 40 of these exhibiting positive trends and 11 exhibiting negative trends. Streamgages with 30 percent or greater development were excluded from regression analyses. A regulation index was developed that accounted for storage and drainage area of dams and drainage area at the streamgage; a value of 0.0040 or more for the regulation index indicates regulated peak streamflow. Frequency analyses were done at 86 streamgages on regulated streams. Regression procedures developed in this study are applicable only to rural, unregulated streams within Virginia and West Virginia with drainage basins that (1) are within the range of drainage areas used to develop the equations for each region, (2) included less than 30 percent of developed area, and (3) had a regulation index less than 0.0040.

Explore related subjects

Scientific Investigations Report Report

Source-reported bounding extent: 35° to 41° latitude; -84° to -75° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Terence Messinger, James M. Duda, Daniel M. Wagner, Padraic S. O’Shea, James D. Scott, Chintamani Kandel. 2026-02-25. Estimation of magnitude and frequency of floods for rural, unregulated streams in and near Virginia and West Virginia. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20255110

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Monitoring recreation on federally managed lands and waters—Aspects of visitor use

Federally managed public lands and waters receive around 1 billion recreational visits each year. Data on these visitors can aid in guiding policy decisions, managing resources effectively, and communicating the economic contributions of lands and waters. This report explores the methods used by agencies to collect data on aspects of recreational visitor use to Federal lands and waters (apart from visitation numbers, which are the focus of a companion publication). Aspects of recreational visitor use include visitor demographics, recreational activity participation, visitor satisfaction, visitor attitudes and experiences, trip characteristics, and economic contributions. We review practices used to understand aspects of visitor use across seven Federal agencies, revealing similarities such as the use of visitor intercept surveys and coverage of similar topic areas, and differences in how survey programs are operationalized and how specific questions on visitor surveys are worded. We also evaluate emerging technologies, such as geolocated social media and mobile device location data, for their potential to aid in understanding aspects of visitor use. This report concludes with potential opportunities to enhance data collection and coordination, ensuring cost-effective data collection and informed decision making.

Scientific Investigations Report↗

USGS2026

Evaluation of best management practices at an edge-of-field site in the Eagle Creek watershed, Ohio, 2012–20

In 2010, the U.S. Geological Survey worked in partnership with the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the Natural Resources Conservation Service to identify farm fields in priority watersheds—watersheds critically important to Great Lake health. Intensive best management practices were implemented in five States to test the efficacy of best management practices, also referred to as agricultural conservation practices, to reduce sediment and nutrient runoff on agricultural fields. These fields were chosen as representatives of the priority watersheds because their farming practices and geographical conditions were common among farms in those watersheds. A farm site located near Findlay, Ohio, in the Eagle Creek watershed used two conservation practices, cover crop (Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 340) and variable rate technology (VRT; Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 590), which represent common practices in the Maumee priority watershed. This study monitored surface runoff and subsurface tile runoff at the Eagle Creek watershed site. The effects of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on sediment and nutrient runoff were assessed from October 2012 to September 2020. Cover crops were applied in fall of 2016, 2017, and 2018, coinciding with VRT applications. The following parameters were analyzed as part of the study: runoff discharge; peak discharge; and concentrations and loads of total phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, dissolved reactive phosphorus, and suspended sediment. High peak runoff events disproportionally affected nutrient concentrations and loads in runoff. A threshold of the 85th percentile of the peak discharge was chosen to assess the effect of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on nutrient mitigation at each gage. Runoff events below the 85th percentile were considered small, and runoff events over the 85th percentile were considered large. Concentrations from collected water-quality samples were used for the analysis; estimated concentrations were excluded from the statistical evaluation. All surface runoff parameters during small runoff events, except surface runoff volume, were significantly lower in the period with cover crops and VRT implementation. Contrarily, subsurface runoff parameters during small events were not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. Surface and subsurface parameters during large events were also not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. These results indicate cover crops and VRT may improve water quality during small runoff events, but additional best management practices that mitigate large runoff events may lead to greater water-quality improvement given the contribution of large events to overall losses.

Ohio↗

USGS2026

Continuous monitoring and temporal variability of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter in karst groundwater of the Edwards aquifer, south-central Texas, 2019–24

Widespread urbanization on the Edwards aquifer recharge zone in south-central Texas has prompted the development of new approaches and tools for evaluating the current and future status of water quality in the San Antonio and Barton Springs segments of the Edwards aquifer. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the San Antonio Water System and the City of Austin, applied continuous monitoring of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (fDOM) to characterize the sources and transport of dissolved organic matter and associated constituents in the Edwards aquifer. Continuous fDOM time-series data were adjusted using empirically derived temperature, turbidity, and inner-filter-effect correction factors prior to analysis and interpretation. Fully corrected fDOM time-series data from the study sites were evaluated for short- and long-term temporal variability in fDOM in the context of the hydrologic and climatic conditions that occurred during the 5-year study period to understand vulnerability of the aquifer to potential contaminants in recharge. Study results indicate that fDOM is an effective proxy for dissolved organic carbon that, in turn, is indicative of the influx of recent surface water and associated contaminants, and thus, aquifer vulnerability to those contaminants. Although other continuously monitored water-quality parameters provide insights into changes in water quality in response to varying hydrologic conditions, the quantitative relation between fDOM and dissolved organic carbon directly indicates the timing and magnitude of pulses of organic constituents derived from the land surface, whereas other water-quality parameters do not.

Texas↗