Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · sir20225019

Bedload and suspended-sediment transport in lower Vance Creek, western Washington, water years 2019–20

Abstract

Vance Creek drains a 24 square mile area of the Olympic Mountains in western Washington. The lower 4 miles of the creek often go dry in discontinuous patches during the summer, limiting salmon rearing success. To better understand sediment transport dynamics in the creek and aid in potential restoration design, bedload and suspended-sediment concentration samples were collected for water years 2019–20 at a site about 2 miles upstream from the creek’s confluence with the South Fork Skokomish River. Fifty bedload samples and 7 suspended-sediment concentration samples were collected over 7 sampling days. These samples were used to develop rating curves relating bedload flux or suspended-sediment concentration to discharge. Mean annual bedload flux was estimated to be 12,200 ± 2,300 tons per year for water years 1930–2020 period of record, based on application of the derived bedload rating curve to an extrapolated daily discharge record. The mean annual suspended-sediment load over the same period was estimated to be 9,000 tons per year with large, but unquantified, uncertainty. Bedload material was predominantly gravel from 0.08 to 2.5 inches (2 to 64 millimeters) in diameter. At the highest sampled discharges, approximately equivalent to a 50 percent annual exceedance probability (2-year peak-flow event), the bedload grain-size distribution was similar to that of the local channel bed. Bedload grain-size distributions generally coarsened as discharge increased. The suspended-sediment load was consistently one-half sand and one-half silt and clay, regardless of discharge. Bedload constituted about 60 percent of the total sediment flux (bedload plus suspended load). This is near the upper limit of values observed in a global compilation of long-term load partitioning data. Sediment transport at the Vance Creek sampling site was compared with sediment-transport data from five other watersheds in the region. To facilitate comparisons, mean annual loads were divided by mean annual runoff volume to obtain an effective average sediment concentration. This normalization accounts for differences in both drainage area and mean runoff depth between the comparison watersheds. At the three comparison watershed sites with relatively complete sediment-transport data, mean bedload concentrations ranged from 44 to 109 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and mean suspended-sediment concentrations ranged from 139 to 374 mg/L; bedload constituted 21 to 29 percent of the total sediment load. The mean bedload concentration at the Vance Creek sampling site (69 mg/L) fell in the middle of the range observed in comparison watersheds, whereas the mean suspended-sediment concentration (50 mg/L) was markedly lower. Bedload samples at the Vance Creek sampling site also were generally less sand rich (sample-average sand fraction was 13 percent at Vance Creek versus 20 to 37 percent for comparison waters). Bedload transport rates at the Vance Creek sampling site appear relatively average for the region, given the drainage basin area and average runoff. In contrast, the supply and transport of finer material, both in the suspended load and the sand fraction of the bedload, are relatively low.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 47.3208° to 47.325° latitude; -123.2889° to -123.2833° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Scott W. Anderson. 2022-03-23. Bedload and suspended-sediment transport in lower Vance Creek, western Washington, water years 2019–20. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Monitoring recreation on federally managed lands and waters—Aspects of visitor use

Federally managed public lands and waters receive around 1 billion recreational visits each year. Data on these visitors can aid in guiding policy decisions, managing resources effectively, and communicating the economic contributions of lands and waters. This report explores the methods used by agencies to collect data on aspects of recreational visitor use to Federal lands and waters (apart from visitation numbers, which are the focus of a companion publication). Aspects of recreational visitor use include visitor demographics, recreational activity participation, visitor satisfaction, visitor attitudes and experiences, trip characteristics, and economic contributions. We review practices used to understand aspects of visitor use across seven Federal agencies, revealing similarities such as the use of visitor intercept surveys and coverage of similar topic areas, and differences in how survey programs are operationalized and how specific questions on visitor surveys are worded. We also evaluate emerging technologies, such as geolocated social media and mobile device location data, for their potential to aid in understanding aspects of visitor use. This report concludes with potential opportunities to enhance data collection and coordination, ensuring cost-effective data collection and informed decision making.

Scientific Investigations Report

Evaluation of best management practices at an edge-of-field site in the Eagle Creek watershed, Ohio, 2012–20

In 2010, the U.S. Geological Survey worked in partnership with the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the Natural Resources Conservation Service to identify farm fields in priority watersheds—watersheds critically important to Great Lake health. Intensive best management practices were implemented in five States to test the efficacy of best management practices, also referred to as agricultural conservation practices, to reduce sediment and nutrient runoff on agricultural fields. These fields were chosen as representatives of the priority watersheds because their farming practices and geographical conditions were common among farms in those watersheds. A farm site located near Findlay, Ohio, in the Eagle Creek watershed used two conservation practices, cover crop (Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 340) and variable rate technology (VRT; Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 590), which represent common practices in the Maumee priority watershed. This study monitored surface runoff and subsurface tile runoff at the Eagle Creek watershed site. The effects of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on sediment and nutrient runoff were assessed from October 2012 to September 2020. Cover crops were applied in fall of 2016, 2017, and 2018, coinciding with VRT applications. The following parameters were analyzed as part of the study: runoff discharge; peak discharge; and concentrations and loads of total phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, dissolved reactive phosphorus, and suspended sediment. High peak runoff events disproportionally affected nutrient concentrations and loads in runoff. A threshold of the 85th percentile of the peak discharge was chosen to assess the effect of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on nutrient mitigation at each gage. Runoff events below the 85th percentile were considered small, and runoff events over the 85th percentile were considered large. Concentrations from collected water-quality samples were used for the analysis; estimated concentrations were excluded from the statistical evaluation. All surface runoff parameters during small runoff events, except surface runoff volume, were significantly lower in the period with cover crops and VRT implementation. Contrarily, subsurface runoff parameters during small events were not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. Surface and subsurface parameters during large events were also not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. These results indicate cover crops and VRT may improve water quality during small runoff events, but additional best management practices that mitigate large runoff events may lead to greater water-quality improvement given the contribution of large events to overall losses.

Ohio

Continuous monitoring and temporal variability of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter in karst groundwater of the Edwards aquifer, south-central Texas, 2019–24

Widespread urbanization on the Edwards aquifer recharge zone in south-central Texas has prompted the development of new approaches and tools for evaluating the current and future status of water quality in the San Antonio and Barton Springs segments of the Edwards aquifer. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the San Antonio Water System and the City of Austin, applied continuous monitoring of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (fDOM) to characterize the sources and transport of dissolved organic matter and associated constituents in the Edwards aquifer. Continuous fDOM time-series data were adjusted using empirically derived temperature, turbidity, and inner-filter-effect correction factors prior to analysis and interpretation. Fully corrected fDOM time-series data from the study sites were evaluated for short- and long-term temporal variability in fDOM in the context of the hydrologic and climatic conditions that occurred during the 5-year study period to understand vulnerability of the aquifer to potential contaminants in recharge. Study results indicate that fDOM is an effective proxy for dissolved organic carbon that, in turn, is indicative of the influx of recent surface water and associated contaminants, and thus, aquifer vulnerability to those contaminants. Although other continuously monitored water-quality parameters provide insights into changes in water quality in response to varying hydrologic conditions, the quantitative relation between fDOM and dissolved organic carbon directly indicates the timing and magnitude of pulses of organic constituents derived from the land surface, whereas other water-quality parameters do not.

Texas