Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · pp1262

Origin and character of loesslike silt in unglaciated south-central Yakutia, Siberia, U.S.S.R.

Abstract

Loesslike silt mantles upland terraces and low plateaus throughout unglaciated south-central Yakutia but is thickest along the south side of the lower Aldan River valley and the east side of the Lena River valley. The silt is probably loess deposited during glacial advances by winds blowing southward from the Verkhoyansk Range and eastward across the broad vegetation-free flood plain of the braided Lena River. The well-sorted uniform tan silt is well displayed along the Aldan and Lena Rivers; the thickest exposure measured, more than 60 m, is on the Tyungyulyu Terrace on the east side of the Lena River. On the west side of the valley, it is 10-25 m thick but thins rapidly to a featheredge west of Yakutsk. Almost all scarps along the south side of the Aldan River are capped by 10-35 m of silt. The texture and mineral composition of the loess like silt are uniform throughout south-central Yakutia, whether it overlies limestone, poorly consolidated sandstone, alluvium, and glacial outwash. All silt samples examined contained a high percentage of quartz and feldspar. The silt stands in sheer cliffs and is massive, with little or no stratification. The origin of the loesslike silt has been ascribed to disintegration in place of country rock by a marine, estuarine, lacustrine, fluvial, residual, or eolian source, or to a combination of these processes. The marine and estuarine hypotheses have never had strong support, but the lacustrine, fluvial, and residual hypotheses have been advanced by many Soviet workers. The most widely accepted explanation of the origin of the upland silt is that it is a combination of lacustrine and alluvial deposits formed on great flood plains and marshy plains. This origin is unlikely, however, because there are no shorelines, wave-cut beaches, deltas, mudcracks, or ripple marks. Neither distinct stratification nor an appreciable amount of clay exists in the silt. Moreover, there is no definite upper boundary to the deposits, as would be expected of lacustrine deposits. The loesslike silt has also been described as a residual deposit formed by the breakdown, by freezing and thawing, of the underlying rocks. The silt bears no chemical, mineralogic, or textural relation to the underlying strata, however, and it is too thick to represent only breakdown of rocks in place. The widespread mantle of uniform loesslike silt is here considered to be windblown, derived from glacial outwash in braided streams and on broad plains, because: (1) it occurs as a surficial mantle; (2) it is lithologically independent of the underlying material; (3) it is stratified indistinctly or not at all, except in retransported material; (4) it is associated with sand dunes; (5) it contains fossils of land animals; (6) its sorting and texture are similar to that of loess and windblown dust from many places elsewhere in the world; (7) its grains are angular and relatively unweathered.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Troy Lewis Pewe, Andre Journaux. 1983. Origin and character of loesslike silt in unglaciated south-central Yakutia, Siberia, U.S.S.R.. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1262

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Resurvey of the Marble Canyon and Bridge Canyon dam sites in Grand Canyon National Park—Changes in sediment storage and evidence supporting the occurrence of bedrock incision through the mid-20th century

The Bureau of Reclamation developed an extensive plan for a network of dams, water tunnels, and hydropower plants in and around Grand Canyon, Arizona, in the 1940s through 1960s. The two largest of these planned dams were the Marble Canyon and Bridge Canyon Dams on the Colorado River. Though these dams were ultimately never built, Reclamation conducted extensive topographic, bathymetric, and subsurface exploration work at the sites proposed for these dams in the 1940s and 1950s. Resurveys of these dam sites were conducted between 1998 and 2021 to determine the changes in sediment storage at these dam sites caused by the upstream construction and operation of Glen Canyon Dam and by the recession of Lake Mead, the reservoir impounded by Hoover Dam. The resurveys of the Marble Canyon dam sites indicate that the post-1950s changes in sediment storage at these dam sites are broadly consistent with flux-based estimates of voluminous sand erosion from Marble Canyon since the 1963 closure of Glen Canyon Dam. These resurveys also suggest that the pre-dam longitudinal variation in sediment thickness over bedrock played a key role in determining the locations of the sand erosion induced by Glen Canyon Dam; more sand eroded from locations where more sand was present in the 1950s. The resurvey of the Bridge Canyon dam sites indicates that the Colorado River’s incision of the Lake Mead delta is regulated both by bed-sediment grain size and downstream hydraulic controls. Finally, analyses of bed-sediment thickness and sedimentological data at the dam sites, and observations of bed scour and gravel transport, suggest that sufficient bedrock was exposed to allow bedrock incision during commonly recurring pre-dam snowmelt floods that entrained small boulders into transport.

Arizona

The eruptive behavior of distributed volcanism forming low shield edifices—A case study of Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field, U.S.A.

Distributed volcanic fields are present in various tectonic settings worldwide, and their characteristics reflect differing influences from magmatic and tectonic processes. In the southwestern United States alone, there are 37 Quaternary distributed volcanic fields. After the primary period of extensional tectonics in the southern Basin and Range 15–5 million years ago, the Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field developed in southwestern Arizona between 4 and 1 million years ago. The Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field consists primarily of low relief shield volcanoes, a type of distributed volcanism with poorly understood temporal evolution. The Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field is less than 200 kilometers (km) from the Colorado Plateau, Gulf of California, and southern San Andreas Fault system. This work identifies and examines controls on the emplacement of the Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field by documenting shallow and surficial structures as well as eruption characteristics and style through time. The Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field consists of 21 volcanoes with a total of 33 vents over an area of about 770 square kilometers (km 2 ). The prominence of low relief shield volcanoes may be explained by ascent of basaltic magmas through thin Basin and Range crust, without much crustal contamination, and low viscosities common to mafic compositions. Typical eruption characteristics involve the construction of low relief shield volcanoes followed by Strombolian fissure eruptions at the summits or near-summit medial areas that produce scoria lapilli, which may weld to form agglomerate. The total lifetime erupted volume of about 4.3 cubic kilometers (km 3 ) represents an average eruptive flux of approximately 2x10 -3 km 3 per thousand years (k.y.). This erupted volume is low relative to Neogene basaltic intraplate distributed volcanic fields worldwide, which typically range from 10 -3 to 1 km 3 k.y. -1 . Sentinel-Arlington volcanic field eruptions were likely triggered by intermittent rejuvenation of transient magmatic zones that exist in thinned crust. Instantaneous flux from point sources feeding the lava flows is estimated to be on the order of 10 -1 to 10 cubic meters per second.

Arizona

Capitalization of positional (Lower/Middle/Upper) and temporal (Early/Middle/Late) adjectives in the names of formal chronostratigraphic and geochronologic units of the Phanerozoic

Many authors are understandably confused about the capitalization of the words “lower,” “middle,” “upper,” “early,” and “late.” Where these words are used simply as descriptive adjectives, they should be in lowercase; where they form the first word of a formal chronostratigraphic or geochronologic unit name, they should be in uppercase.

Professional Paper