Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · ofr78957

Reconnaissance of chemical quality of surface water and fluvial sediment in the Dirty Devil River basin, Utah

Abstract

The water-quality reconnaissance in the Dirty Devil River basin, Utah, covered an area of about 4,300 square miles (11,100 square kilo-meters). Data were obtained by the U.S. Geological Survey one or more times at 104 sites during the period July 1975 to September 1976; and during visits to 34 other sites during the same period, the streams were dry. Precipitation was below normal in both 1975 and 1976 at weather stations at Emery and Capitol Reef National Park and was above normal in 1975 and below normal in 1976 at Hanksville. Streamflow was near normal in the Dirty Devil River basin in 1975 and was much below normal in 1976. Rocks that crop out in the basin range in age from Permian to Quaternary. The Carmel Formation of Jurassic age and various members of the Mancos Shale of Cretaceous age are major contributors of dissolved solids to streams in the basin. Major diversions are made from Muddy Creek for irrigation in the Emery area. Downstream reaches of Muddy Creek commonly receive only seepage and irrigation return flow. Three major irrigation diversions near Fremont commonly remove nearly all the flow from the upper Fremont River. Major flow accretions to the Fremont River in Bicknell Bottoms furnish water for additional diversions along the remaining length of the Fremont River. The most pronounced change in chemical characteristics of water in streams in the Dirty Devil River basin occurs in a 15-mile (24-kilometer) reach of Muddy Creek between the major diversions 5 miles (8 kilometers) north of Emery and the point at which Highway 1-70 crosses Muddy Creek. Dissolved-solids concentrations at the diversions are generally less than 300 milligrams per liter and at the lower end of the reach are commonly greater than 2,000 milligrams per liter. Factors that contribute to the deterioration in the chemical quality of water in the Emery area are the soluble minerals in the rocks of Cretaceous age that crop out in the area, the major or total diversion of flow of Muddy Creek, and the irrigation of and return flow from soils that have commonly developed on material derived from gypsum-bearing marine shale. Dissolved-solids concentrations remain high to the mouth of Muddy Creek near Hanksville. Only one perennial stream--Salt Wash--enters Muddy Creek between Highway 1-70 and the mouth. The discharge of Salt Wash is usually 2.0 to 2.5 cubic feet per second (0.057 to 0.071 cubic meter per second), and the dissolved-solids concentration ranges from about 5,400 to 5,900 milligrams per liter.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.997968° to 42.001567° latitude; -114.052962° to -109.041058° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J. C. Mundorff. 1978. Reconnaissance of chemical quality of surface water and fluvial sediment in the Dirty Devil River basin, Utah. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr78957

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona