Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · ofr7142

The vertical gradient of gravity in vertical and near vertical boreholes

Abstract

The vertical gradient of gravity is the rate of change of gravity in the direction of the plumb line. For a vertical borehole interval, it is approximated by the ratio of the gravity difference to the height difference as measured between the end points of the interval. The borehole vertical gradient is strongly affected by the densities of the rocks laterally adjacent to the well. Because of this useful effect, vertical (gravimetric) density profiles of the rooks adjacent to the borehole can be calculated from the borehole vertical gradients. A second useful effect, termed the "anomalous" vertical gradient, is caused by non-level equal-density surfaces related to the local and regional geology. The anomalous vertical gradient can enhance exploration beyond the confines of the borehole although it is a small and commonly negligible effect. These two useful effects are not determinable with absolute accuracy from observed borehole vertical gradients without independent subsurface rock density and (or) surface gravity information. In this study observed vertical gradients from high-precision, detailed gravity surveys made in seven shallow oil wells that penetrate a late Cenozoic sequence of marine and non-marine rocks in the Midway-Sunset Oil Field, California, are interpreted to obtain vertical density profiles. These gravimetric density profiles are adjusted 1) for anomalous vertical gradients calculated from surface gravity maps end, alternatively, measured on a portable tower and 2) for small extraneous effects of surface topography. The unadjusted and adjusted density profiles are compared with density measurements of core samples. The unadjusted density profiles of six wells are on the average systematically greater than core densities by .05 g/cm 3 . Adjusted profiles for the same wells agree with core densities to within .01 g/cm 3 on the average. Densities of an adjusted profile of a seventh well are .15 g/cm 3 less than those of the unadjusted profile and are in better agreement with core densities by that amount. However, residual systematic discrepancies between core and gravimetric densities for this seventh well indicate a measurable variation of the anomalous vertical gradient with depth and (or) lack of representative core density data. Topographic effects and anomalous vertical gradients in boreholes are usually small and change slowly with depth but, in some instances, may be comparatively large and change rapidly with depth. In the former case, gravimetric density profiles unadjusted for these effects can be in error by as much as about .05 g/cm 3 and, in the latter case, by as much as several tenths of a g/cm 3 . In both cases, relative errors between neighboring parts of the density profiles are much smaller. In cases where the anomalous vertical gradient changes appreciably with depth, it cannot be reliably estimated in the borehole from surface gravity measurements or from tower gradient measurements, which are especially sensitive to very shallow local density irregularities. At any borehole depth the anomalous gradient can be estimated from the difference between core and gravimetric densities of the same borehole interval. The core densities must be highly accurate and representative of the interval and the gravimetric density must he adjusted for topographic effects. Measured borehole vertical gradients have precisions of .00025 to .00050 mgal/ft (8 to 16 Eotvos units) for vertical intervals as small as 10 feet (3 meters); this meets the most stringent requirements of recognized applications for borehole gravimetry. An ideal borehole density logging device would be an in-motion continuously recording vertical gravity gradiometer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Larry A. Beyer. 1971. The vertical gradient of gravity in vertical and near vertical boreholes. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr7142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

ECCOE Landsat quarterly calibration and validation report—Quarter 2, 2026

Executive Summary The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Center of Excellence (ECCOE) focuses on improving the accuracy, precision, calibration, and product quality of remote-sensing data, leveraging years of multiscale optical system geometric and radiometric calibration and characterization experience. The ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team continually monitors the geometric and radiometric performance of active Landsat missions and makes calibration adjustments, as needed, to maintain data quality at the highest level. This report provides observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9 for quarter 2 (April–June), 2026. All data used to compile the Cal/Val analysis results presented in this report are freely available from the U.S. Geological Survey EarthExplorer website: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov.

Open-File Report↗

ECCOE Landsat quarterly calibration and validation report—Quarter 1, 2026

Executive Summary The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Calibration and Validation (Cal/Val) Center of Excellence (ECCOE) focuses on improving the accuracy, precision, calibration, and product quality of remote-sensing data, leveraging years of multiscale optical system geometric and radiometric calibration and characterization experience. The ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team continually monitors the geometric and radiometric performance of active Landsat missions and makes calibration adjustments, as needed, to maintain data quality at the highest level. This report provides observed geometric and radiometric analysis results for Landsats 8 and 9 for quarter 1 (January–March) of 2026. All data used to compile the Cal/Val analysis results presented in this report are freely available from the U.S. Geological Survey EarthExplorer website: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov . One specific activity that the ECCOE Landsat Cal/Val Team closely monitored was a Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor encoder alerts anomaly. On March 18, 2026, the Thermal Infrared Sensor instrument’s mechanism control electronics board reset, driving several parameters to default power-on values. Subsequent telemetry and analysis determined that no persistent hardware misconfiguration was present and no radiometric or geometric degradation was observed.

Open-File Report↗

Floods of June 20–July 6, 2024, in the Big Sioux River, Rock River, Little Sioux River, Ocheyedan River, and Floyd River Basins, northwestern Iowa

Major flooding occurred on June 20–July 6, 2024, in northwestern Iowa affecting the Big Sioux, Rock, Little Sioux, Ocheyedan, and Floyd River Basins. Heavy rain fell in northwestern Iowa, southwestern Minnesota, and southeastern South Dakota on June 20–22, 2024. Parts of northwestern Iowa recorded 2–6 inches of rainfall and localized amounts exceeding 12 inches. A maximum peak-of-record streamflow of 175,000 cubic feet per second at the U.S. Geological Survey streamgage Big Sioux River at Akron, Iowa (06485500), was recorded on June 22, 2024, and had an annual exceedance probability range of 0.2–0.49 percent. High-water marks were measured at four locations along the Big Sioux River between U.S. Interstate 29 at Sioux City, Iowa, upstream to Iowa Highway 10 north of Hawarden, Iowa, a distance of 75.7 river miles. A maximum peak-of-record streamflow of 157,000 cubic feet per second at the U.S. Geological Survey streamgage Rock River near Rock Valley, Iowa (06483500), was recorded on June 22, 2024, and had an annual exceedance probability of less than 0.2 percent. High-water marks were measured at eight locations along the Rock River between County Road B30 east of Hudson, South Dakota, upstream to Iowa Highway 9 at Rock Rapids, Iowa, a distance of 39.3 river miles. A maximum peak-of-record streamflow of 63,000 cubic feet per second at the U.S. Geological Survey streamgage Little Sioux River at Correctionville, Iowa (06606600), was recorded on June 24, 2024, and had an annual exceedance probability range of 0.2–0.49 percent. High-water marks were measured at 11 locations along the Little Sioux River between Iowa Highway 31 west of Correctionville, Iowa, upstream to U.S. Highway 18 north of Spencer, Iowa, a distance of 134.8 river miles. A maximum streamflow of 24,500 cubic feet per second at the U.S. Geological Survey streamgage Ocheyedan River near Spencer, Iowa (06605000), was recorded on June 22, 2024, and had an annual exceedance probability range of 0.2–0.49 percent. High-water marks were measured at three locations along the Ocheyedan River between County Road M38 west of Spencer, Iowa, upstream to U.S. Highway 18 west of Everly, Iowa, a distance of 12.8 river miles. A maximum streamflow of 41,000 cubic feet per second at the U.S. Geological Survey streamgage Floyd River at Alton, Iowa (06600100), was recorded on June 22, 2024, and had an annual exceedance probability range of 1–1.99 percent. High-water marks were measured at six locations along the Floyd River between Iowa Highway 3 at Le Mars, Iowa, upstream to Iowa Highway 10 at Alton, Iowa, a distance of 27.5 river miles. The high-water marks were used to develop flood profiles for the Big Sioux, Rock, Little Sioux, Ocheyedan, and Floyd Rivers.

Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota↗