Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · ofr20211106

Preliminary geologic map of the Cherry Hill quadrangle, Dinwiddie, Sussex, and Greensville Counties, Virginia

Abstract

The Cherry Hill 7.5-minute quadrangle straddles the Coastal Plain and Piedmont Provinces along the Tidewater Fall Line. Rocks of the eastern Piedmont Roanoke Rapids terrane crop out in the western part of the quadrangle and consist of greenschist- to amphibolite-facies Neoproterozoic felsic to intermediate metavolcanic rocks, some of which contain flattened quartz phenocrysts and are locally isoclinally folded; greenstone that locally preserves primary layering; and intrusive metadiorite and metagabbro, much of which has been altered to amphibolite. Most of these rocks are strongly foliated and jointed. Greenschist-facies metasiltstone that preserves primary bedding also occurs locally in the Roanoke Rapids terrane. Neoproterozoic mica schist, middle Paleozoic foliated metagranite, and late Paleozoic massive and porphyritic granite crop out in the eastern part of the quadrangle and are part of the Dinwiddie terrane and the late Paleozoic De Witt pluton. Upper greenschist- to lower amphibolite-facies mica schist consists of stringers and boudins of vein quartz and contains porphyroclasts of staurolite that preserve an earlier foliation as inclusion trails. Porphyroblasts of garnet, staurolite, and kyanite also occur locally. Foliation in granites of the De Witt pluton may be magmatic. Separating the Dinwiddie terrane from the Roanoke Rapids terrane are greenschist-facies, highly strained granitic mylonite and bodies of less deformed granite within the Nottoway River fault zone, which is a strand of the eastern Piedmont fault system. Paleozoic pegmatite dikes and quartz veins cross-cut rocks of the Dinwiddie terrane, and quartz veins and Jurassic diabase dikes cross-cut rocks of the Roanoke Rapids terrane. Sand and gravel deposits of the Atlantic Coastal Plain overlie Piedmont rocks. Two units assigned to the upper part of the Neogene Chesapeake Group occur at elevations up to 295 feet (90 meters) above sea level atop the Richmond plain in the central part of the quadrangle. Two units of the Quaternary Bacons Castle Formation occupy the Essex plain and Norge uplands at elevations up to 180 feet (55 meters) above sea level in the eastern part of the quadrangle. In the western part of the quadrangle, multiple levels of terrace deposits are the fluvial equivalent of estuarine to marine units of the Atlantic Coastal Plain to the east. Holocene alluvium occurs along creeks and the Nottoway River. Quaternary colluvial deposits occur locally. Numerous Carolina bays pock the landscape of the Richmond and Essex plains, and three abandoned channelways represent former locations of Sappony Creek, one of the major drainages of the quadrangle. Brittle faults juxtapose Piedmont basement rocks against Neogene sediments of the upper part of the Chesapeake Group. These Cenozoic faults were first uncovered in mine excavations in the late 1990s; new mapping indicates that many of these faults are reactivated silicified cataclasite zones that occur throughout the Piedmont basement rocks. Silicified cataclasites and associated quartz veins are typically mineralized with iron and iron sulfide minerals. The quadrangle was the focus of extensive mining for heavy minerals, including ilmenite and zircon, in upland Atlantic Coastal Plain deposits beginning in the mid-1990s. Other mineral resources, including precious metals, clay for structural brick, crushed stone, and building stone for millstones, have also been prospected or quarried in the quadrangle.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.875° to 37° latitude; -77.625° to -77.5° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark W. Carter, Adam T. Karst, C. Rick Berquist, J. Stephen Schindler, Robert E. Weems, Benjamin R. Weinmann, E. Allen Crider,. 2022-03-10. Preliminary geologic map of the Cherry Hill quadrangle, Dinwiddie, Sussex, and Greensville Counties, Virginia. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona