Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70283183

Honey bee-collected pollen richness and protein content across an agricultural land-use gradient

Abstract

Higher protein content and greater taxonomic richness of pollen have been noted as beneficial for bee health, but the relationship between pollen protein content and richness as well as how pollen protein content varies across landscape gradients remain understudied. We assessed correlations between pollen protein content and plant species richness and species composition in pollen collected from honey bee colonies across three states over 2 years. We selected sites along an agricultural-grassland gradient to investigate how pollen protein content and species composition varied with land-use. We observed a weak, negative relationship between pollen protein content and taxonomic richness, although we found no evidence of relationships between land-use and either pollen richness or species composition. Results suggest that the richness of pollen collected by honey bees can, albeit weakly, correlate with the pollen protein content in agroecosystems of the Upper Midwest, and that in some systems, land use may have minimal influence on the species collected by honey bees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael P. Simanonok, Clint R.V. Otto, Deborah D. Iwanowicz, Robert S. Cornman. 2021-12-21. Honey bee-collected pollen richness and protein content across an agricultural land-use gradient. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00902-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating bee abundance: Can mark-recapture methods validate common sampling protocols?

Wild bees are essential pollinators in natural and agricultural systems, but populations of some species have declined. Efforts to assess the status of wild bees are hindered by uncertainty in common sampling methods, such as pan traps and aerial netting, which may or may not provide a valid index of abundance across species and habitats. Mark-recapture methods are a common and effective means of estimating population size, widely used in vertebrates but rarely applied to bees. Here we review existing mark-recapture studies of wild bees and present a new case study comparing mark-recapture population estimates to pan trap and net capture for four taxa in a wild bee community. Net, but not trap, capture was correlated with abundance estimates across sites and taxa. Logistical limitations ensure that mark-recapture studies will not fully replace other bee sampling methods, but they do provide a feasible way to monitor selected species and measure the performance of other sampling methods.

Apidologie↗