Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70283053

Waterfowl endozoochory: Traits drive plant-bird dispersal interactions in North America

Abstract

Plant biogeography and ongoing changes in plant distributions are influenced by long-distance dispersal (LDD) of seeds, and migratory waterfowl (Anatidae: Ducks, geese and swans) are particularly important for the dispersal of plants in and around wetlands through gut passage (endozoochory). However, this dispersal is not contemplated by classical dispersal syndromes; hence, currently we have limited understanding of what angiosperm traits predict seed dispersal by waterfowl and any differences due to avian trait variation among waterfowl species. We conducted a literature search for data on the presence of seeds in the alimentary canal or faeces of North American waterfowl as a proxy for dispersal interactions, since an important fraction of these seeds survives gut passage. We present a list of North American flowering plant species ( N = 536) from 95 families potentially dispersed by 38 waterfowl species, together with traits of these plants and their vectors. Owing largely to limited sampling effort, 47% of plant species and 35% of plant genera recorded were only found in a single waterfowl species. A suite of analytical approaches revealed major differences in the traits of plants whose seeds are ingested and likely dispersed between foraging groups (guilds) and in relation to other waterfowl traits. Diving ducks and sea ducks are associated with sublittoral plants that have submerged or floating leaves, and hence with the classical hydrochory syndrome. Dabbling ducks and herbivorous waterfowl (notably geese) are associated with terrestrial herbaceous plants, and also with the unspecialised dispersal syndrome common in terrestrial plants. Plants with larger seeds or of greater height are more likely to be dispersed by dabbling ducks, whereas shorter plants are more likely to be dispersed by geese than by other waterfowl. Network analyses of interactions between waterfowl species and plant traits were generally consistent with these results, but also provided evidence that not all geese, dabbling ducks, or sea duck species are alike in their interactions with plants along the terrestrial–aquatic gradient, but instead occupy distinct dispersal niches. The traditional classification of waterfowl into guilds therefore does not accurately reflect their differing roles in the ingestion and dispersal of plant seeds. Aquatic plant species had more vector species than terrestrial ones. Detailed studies of waterfowl endozoochory and more trait determinations for North American plants are needed to facilitate predictions of LDD as waterfowl population sizes and migration patterns vary in the future with climate change.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bia A. Almeida, Giliandro G. Silva, Mihai Costea, Leonardo Maltchik, Susan E.W. De La Cruz, John Takekawa, Andy J. Green. 2025-04-07. Waterfowl endozoochory: Traits drive plant-bird dispersal interactions in North America. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70027

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Growth of a threatened desert fish becomes resource dependent when released from temperature limitation in a regulated river

1. Growth of ectotherms typically positively correlates with increasing temperature towards an optimal temperature range, followed by a decline in growth when temperatures exceed the optimal temperature range for that organism. When temperature is within or close to the optimal range, food availability and other environmental factors can play important roles in modifying growth rates. River regulation often alters both environmental conditions (e.g., flow, turbidity and temperature) and aquatic food webs, modifying the quality and quantity of resources available to consumers. Here we aim to understand how food availability, water temperature and other environmental factors are associated with fish growth (defined here as a change in length) in a large, regulated desert river. 2. We measured growth of humpback chub (Gila cypha) at two river reaches located 240 km apart in the Colorado River within the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. We then fit Bayesian state-space models of growth that account for variable time at large to test environmental predictors such as water temperature, flow, turbidity (which increases during tributary flooding and can be a proxy for allochthonous inputs) and gross primary productivity (a proxy for autochthonous food) using an inclusion parameter approach. Both river reaches are located below Glen Canyon Dam, which regulates flow, alters seasonal water temperatures and traps sediment, nutrients, and organic carbon; however, merging tributaries and a greater distance from the dam lead to differences in environmental conditions. 3. In the upriver reach, where warm season water temperatures are below the optimal range for humpback chub most of the time, temperature was the primary driver of variation in growth according to inclusion parameter values and the strength of the standardised effect size. Turbidity was also included in the final model for the upper reach, but the inclusion parameter values and standardised effect size were smaller than for temperature. In the downriver, warmer reach, temperature still had the highest inclusion parameter value, but GPP had the highest standardised effect and nearly as high an inclusion parameter value. 4. We conclude that temperature is the primary limiting factor on growth of humpback chub in the Grand Canyon; however, as water temperatures increase, other factors, especially GPP, are associated with temporal variation in growth rates. Over the past two decades, declines in reservoir elevations and the volume of summer releases have increased downstream water temperatures. If warm temperatures persist into the future, other factors may have increasing roles in regulating interannual variability in chub growth. 5. Field studies of ectotherm growth often emphasise the role of water temperature; however, the role of resource availability is also increasingly recognised, especially in bioenergetics studies. Quantifying resource availability directly can be difficult, especially in large, remote rivers. Here, we show here that using proxies for resource availability (i.e., GPP as a proxy for autochthonous inputs) can yield useful insights regarding resource limitations with implications for management of federally listed fish species in a larger regulated river system.

Arizona↗

Seasonal environmental conditions and river morphology shape summer phytoplankton communities

1. Phytoplankton form the base of large river food webs but there are limited studies on the nature and drivers of communities over longer time scales. Further, climate change is projected to favor taxa associated with harmful algal blooms, but our knowledge of the timing, locations, and drivers of cyanobacteria in rivers lags that of lakes and marine environments. 2. We used a summer phytoplankton community dataset collected from 2010-2020 across main channel, side channel and backwater areas in the La Grange reach of the Illinois River to assess: 1) How much do summer phytoplankton communities across diverse aquatic areas within a large river vary from year to year?, 2) What environmental conditions are associated with that variation?, and 3) Do cyanobacteria respond differently than the full phytoplankton community? 3. We found greater differences in phytoplankton communities across years than among aquatic areas. Further, we showed that annual variation in phytoplankton communities was synchronous among taxa in the same aquatic area, rather than specific to each taxonomic group or taxa-area combination. After accounting for this spatial variation in annual dynamics, phytoplankton reflected river conditions across seasons, responding positively to summer total phosphorus and invasive carp abundance and negatively to winter discharge and spring silica to nitrogen ratio. Annual variation in cyanobacteria was similarly distinct among main channel, side channel and backwater areas but was best explained by the ratio of summer air temperature to discharge, representing conditions that favored growth over transport. 4. These results show that annual variation in summer phytoplankton and cyanobacterial communities both reflected the spatial diversity of the river landscape and responded to conditions that occurred at different spatial and temporal scales. Further, in this highly modified river basin, we showed that a mix of anthropogenic pressures including eutrophication, invasive species, and potential changes to winter and spring conditions affected the phytoplankton communities present in the summer. Thus, when evaluating long-term change and the potential for harmful algal blooms in rivers it is important to consider spatial diversity of phytoplankton communities, how their sensitivity to environmental change may vary across the river landscape, and the suite of human modifications acting on those communities.

Illinois↗

Potential thiamine deficiency of phytoplankton across a productivity gradient and seasons in Ohio lakes

Although nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency of algal blooms have been the focus of substantial attention, organic nutrients can limit algal growth in aquatic systems. Growing evidence indicates thiamine (vitamin B 1 ) can influence the community of primary producers in marine systems, but comparatively little is known about the effect of thiamine on freshwater algal productivity. We conducted 106 nutrient deficiency experiments with water from 39 Ohio lakes of varying trophic status during the growing seasons (April–October) of 2008–2009. Specifically, we tested the response of phytoplankton biomass (as chlorophyll a , chl- a ) relative to controls to added nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), thiamine (Th), or combinations of N + P and N + P + Th. Next, we compared the chl- a growth response of treatment/control to published thresholds based on frequentist approaches and compared the conclusions with Bayesian model results that focused on probability of a response. Although N + P addition was consistently associated with the largest chl- a response, we found evidence of a thiamine influence on phytoplankton growth in some experiments. The Bayesian approach suggested thiamine may become more limiting as the growing season progresses. By late in the growing season, there was an 85% probability of a positive algal growth response to thiamine addition. Understanding the role of thiamine or other overlooked nutrients is not likely to alter the prevailing understanding of nutrient deficiency in freshwater ecosystems. However, we present evidence that freshwater phytoplankton may experience thiamine deficiency and suggest limnologists consider thiamine when exploring resource deficiencies.

Ohio↗