Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70277285

Declining geomorphic diversity and potential adaptive management opportunities on a highly regulated reach of the Bighorn River, Montana

Abstract

Rivers downstream from dams often experience decreased flow variability and disrupted sediment transport. We investigated a highly regulated 35.5-kilometre reach of the Bighorn River, downstream from Yellowtail Dam, emplaced in 1965. This dam created a thriving trout fishery, but more recently, side channel networks and habitat diminished. We document how the Bighorn River's anabranching morphology responded to flow regulation and a near cessation of sediment supply. Geomorphic diversity drastically decreased since 1939 and the Bighorn River abandoned numerous side channels. By 1980, geomorphic loss slowed, and the river became laterally static. The 1980 river and side channel network could represent the maximum areal extent of a downscaled morphology, maintained through restoration and adaptive management. However, side channel restoration alone will not return natural alluvial processes to this river reach. The Bighorn River needs sediment to reinstate dynamic lateral movement, even within a downscaled morphology. Sediment augmentation is an option, but more complex to implement on rivers where potential downstream impacts and landowners must be considered. The decline of geomorphic diversity and potential adaptive management solutions on the Bighorn River has wide applicability to numerous dammed rivers, where similar changes to the flow and sediment transport regime are common.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 43.632213437748334° to 45.33118715980132° latitude; -108.81726748415795° to -107.24125899429224° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Melissa A. Foster, Jeanne E. Godaire, Robert C. Hilldale, D. Nathan Bradley, Karin Boyd. 2024-05-09. Declining geomorphic diversity and potential adaptive management opportunities on a highly regulated reach of the Bighorn River, Montana. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2024.2344119

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Riverbank stability assessment of lower Osage River during hydro-peak flow events: The lower Osage River case (Missouri, USA)

The fluctuation of water level downstream from dams due to hydropower flow releases can negatively affect riverbank stability. This research aims to investigate riverbank instability resulting from the outflow variation of hydropower plants, using Bagnell Dam and the lower Osage River (Missouri, USA) as the basis of analysis. The effects of the water releases from the Bagnell Dam were investigated by computing a series of safety factors in relation to outflow events for 78 cross sections along the 130-km stretch of the lower Osage River using the BSTEM algorithm integrated into the HEC-RAS model package. The results showed that the rate of change in the flow magnitude at each cross section impacts the calculated safety factor. The flow release fluctuations will change the value of the safety factor along the river over time, as the safety factor value closely follows the variation in the flow rate. Also, the results show that the cross sections closer to Bagnell Dam are subjected to be more unstable than those farther downstream of Osage River.

Missouri

Evaluating changes to reservoir rule curves using historical water-level data

Flood control reservoirs are typically managed through rule curves (i.e. target water levels) which control the storage and release timing of flood waters. Changes to rule curves are often contemplated and requested by various user groups and management agencies with no information available about the actual flood risk of such requests. Methods of estimating flood risk in reservoirs are not easily available to those unfamiliar with hydrological models that track water movement through a river basin. We developed a quantile regression model that uses readily available daily water-level data to estimate risk of spilling. Our model provided a relatively simple process for estimating the maximum applicable water level under a specific flood risk for any day of the year. This water level represents an upper-limit umbrella under which water levels can be operated in a variety of ways. Our model allows the visualization of water-level management under a user-specified flood risk and provides a framework for incorporating the effect of a changing environment on water-level management in reservoirs, but is not designed to replace existing hydrological models. The model can improve communication and collaboration among agencies responsible for managing natural resources dependent on reservoir water levels.

International Journal of River Basin Management

A linear geospatial streamflow modeling system for data sparse environments

In many river basins around the world, inaccessibility of flow data is a major obstacle to water resource studies and operational monitoring. This paper describes a geospatial streamflow modeling system which is parameterized with global terrain, soils and land cover data and run operationally with satellite‐derived precipitation and evapotranspiration datasets. Simple linear methods transfer water through the subsurface, overland and river flow phases, and the resulting flows are expressed in terms of standard deviations from mean annual flow. In sample applications, the modeling system was used to simulate flow variations in the Congo, Niger, Nile, Zambezi, Orange and Lake Chad basins between 1998 and 2005, and the resulting flows were compared with mean monthly values from the open‐access Global River Discharge Database. While the uncalibrated model cannot predict the absolute magnitude of flow, it can quantify flow anomalies in terms of relative departures from mean flow. Most of the severe flood events identified in the flow anomalies were independently verified by the Dartmouth Flood Observatory (DFO) and the Emergency Disaster Database (EM‐DAT). Despite its limitations, the modeling system is valuable for rapid characterization of the relative magnitude of flood hazards and seasonal flow changes in data sparse settings.

International Journal of River Basin Management