Planning for future climates at Wrangell-St. Elias: Mainstreaming park-based actions

Joel H. Reynolds; Mark E. Miller; Amber C Runyon; Gregor W. Schuurman; Jeremy S. Littell; Pam Sousanes; Tom Olliff; Larry Perez; Wylie Carr; David Lawrence; Jeneva P. Wright

USGS · 70274313

Planning for future climates at Wrangell-St. Elias: Mainstreaming park-based actions

Joel H. Reynolds·Mark E. Miller·Amber C Runyon·Gregor W. Schuurman·Jeremy S. Littell·Pam Sousanes·Tom Olliff·Larry Perez·Wylie Carr·David Lawrence·Jeneva P. Wright

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

No abstract available.

Explore related subjects

Alaska Park Science Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 59.688302495160485° to 62.70966687695159° latitude; -145.2891208918619° to -139.0775912683798° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Joel H. Reynolds, Mark E. Miller, Amber C Runyon, Gregor W. Schuurman, Jeremy S. Littell, Pam Sousanes, Tom Olliff, Larry Perez, Wylie Carr, David Lawrence, Jeneva P. Wright. 2023. Planning for future climates at Wrangell-St. Elias: Mainstreaming park-based actions. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70274313

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Connecting the dots: Using multiple datasets to monitor the brown bear population in Katmai National Park and Preserve

Monitoring wide-ranging wildlife populations is challenging. Surveys are time consuming, expensive, and observation conditions need to be just right. But confidently assessing the number of animals, and if their numbers are increasing or decreasing is important for park management and ecological understanding. This article describes survey methods and how they can be combined for the most accurate estimates.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Monitoring for the future of Central Alaska streams

Streams are good indicators of change and the health of watersheds. By monitoring stream chemical composition and the kinds of life they support, we can learn about how they are being stressed (by activities such as mining or climate change) or recovering from a stress (after restoration efforts). But Central Alaska watersheds and the natural stream conditions they produce are diverse. From long-term monitoring, and repeat measurements, we can start to understand the related baselines and fine-tune our understanding of changes.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Using monitoring data to understand lake water quality trends in southwest Alaskan National Parks

Lakes are vital ecosystems in southwest Alaska, supporting Pacific salmon, wildlife, and people. In Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, lakes span diverse landscapes containing volcanic uplands, glacier-fed valleys, and tundra all of which combine to influence their temperature, water quality, and ability to support critical uses. As the regional climate shifts, our understanding of lake responses requires more than just measurements of the lake surface water. Through long-term sampling of lakes from the surface to deep waters, we track how the environment —shaped by weather, geology, and land cover—governs lake water quality, including temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, pH, and turbidity. These data help us understand and predict how lake water quality will change across seasons and landscapes, and what this will mean for lake ecology and the habitats fish and wildlife depend on. This work builds a foundation for predicting how Alaska’s lakes are changing and what that means for the ecosystems and communities they support.

Alaska↗