Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70263554

How low should we alert? Quantifying intensity threshold alerting strategies for earthquake early warning in the United States

Jessie Kate Saunders·Sarah E. Minson·Annemarie S. Baltay
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We use a suite of historical earthquakes to quantitatively determine earthquake early warning (EEW) alert threshold strategies for a range of shaking intensity targets for EEW in the U.S. West Coast. The current method for calculating alert regions for the ShakeAlert EEW System does not take into account variabilities and uncertainties in shaking distribution. As a result, if the modified Mercalli intensity (MMI) level used to determine the extent of the alert region (the alert threshold) is the same as the target intensity threshold, the alert region will be too small to include all locations that require alerts even if earthquake source parameters are estimated accurately. Missed alerts can be reduced by using a lower alert threshold than the target threshold. This expands the alert region, increasing the number of precautionary alerts issued to people who experience shaking below the target level. We determine alert thresholds that optimize this tradeoff between missed and precautionary alerts for target thresholds of MMI 4.0-6.0 using a ShakeMap catalog of 143 M 5.0-7.3 earthquakes as ground truth. We examine the quality of each alerting strategy relative to the target MMI, where we define alert quality metrics in terms of both the area and population alerted. Optimal alert thresholds maximize correct alerts while limiting most precautionary alerts to regions that are likely to still feel some shaking. We find these optimal alert thresholds also maximize warning times. This analysis presents a quantitative framework ShakeAlert can use to communicate alerting strategies and performance expectations to ShakeAlert users.

Explore related subjects

Earth's FutureArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jessie Kate Saunders, Sarah E. Minson, Annemarie S. Baltay. 2022-03-11. How low should we alert? Quantifying intensity threshold alerting strategies for earthquake early warning in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ef002515

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Ecological transformations of coastal wetlands of the conterminous United States in response to contemporaneous sea-level rise

Coastal wetlands are among the most important ecosystems on the planet but are increasingly imperiled by accelerating sea-level rise (SLR). In the past, biogeomorphic feedbacks have allowed coastal wetlands to adjust vertically and persist through periods of accelerated SLR. Recent rates of SLR are faster than any in recent geologic history, making the fate of coastal wetlands highly uncertain. Here, we synthesize surface elevation table marker-horizon data from 442 stations in coastal wetlands across the conterminous United States to evaluate if they are largely persisting in the face of accelerated SLR, or if they are undergoing ecological transformations of submergence and/or migration. Across the conterminous United States, 11% of coastal wetlands in this sample are on a trajectory of submergence whereas 73% of sites are lagging SLR, but may be able to migrate upslope, and 16% of sites are gaining elevation at rates which exceed SLR indicating persistence and an ability to migrate seaward. Vulnerability of these systems to ecological transformation varies across the three coasts of the conterminous United States which, span large biogeomorphic gradients. These results serve as one of the first national syntheses of coastal wetland elevation trends and may help focus conservation and restoration efforts in a rapidly changing future.

conterminous United States↗
USGS2026

Significant coastal dune loss challenges California's climate resilience and biodiversity goals

Coastal sand dunes support unique biodiversity and buffer beaches and communities against storm impacts. However, these sensitive and dynamic ecosystems are increasingly threatened by erosion, sea-level rise (SLR), and encroaching coastal development. Restoration projects designed to re-establish the eco-geomorphic functions of degraded dunes and associated ecosystem services present a viable pathway to relieve these stressors. Yet, even for populated coasts like California, insufficient information on the location of dunes and patterns of change over time constrain regional efforts to identify suitable restoration/conservation sites, and forecast future impacts on vulnerable beach–dune systems. Here, we present a comprehensive assessment of coastal dune extent and loss, spanning 165 years and 9.5° of latitude across California. Areas and drivers of change were quantified by comparing historical and current dune extents generated using historical surveys, high-resolution aerial imagery, and LiDAR, combined with a machine-learning tool. Coastal dunes currently extend along 352 km (22%) of California's 1,625 km coastline, covering almost 300 km 2 . This represents a 60% (442 km 2 ) decrease in area since the mid-1800s with the loss, degradation, and fragmentation of many dune ecosystems attributed to urban development, altered land-uses, and erosion. Strong regional patterns of dune loss were evident, reflecting population demographics and land uses. Densely populated areas of southern California experienced the greatest dune losses (95%, 108 km 2 ), although substantial reductions were also found in central California (60%, 331 km 2 ). Our results highlight the magnitude of coastal change in California over time and can inform future conservation, restoration, and resilience-planning efforts and priorities.

California↗
USGS2026

Storm surge barriers reduce seaward sediment supply to lagoonal estuaries

Numerical simulations with realistic forcing of fixed infrastructure for a proposed storm surge barrier for a lagoonal estuary, Jamaica Bay (New York, USA), are analyzed during typical forcing conditions to assess alterations to flow and sediment transport with the barrier open. Lagoonal estuaries are shallow and have modest watershed freshwater and sediment inputs, so sediment delivery is primarily from offshore by tidal transport. The storm surge barrier infrastructure across the inlet channel reduces cross-sectional area and increases tidal velocities, increasing frictional and form drag. The overall reduction in tidal amplitude is about 1%, but the quarterdiurnal M 4 component decreases by 11%. The salinity and stratification in the estuary are only slightly modified by mixing by stronger velocities near the barrier. Sediment transport in the inlet scales approximately with tidal velocity cubed and net landward transport is driven by flood-dominant tidal asymmetry. Additionally, tidal asymmetry in the jet flow through barrier openings causes a divergence in sediment transport within several kilometers. The alterations to the tidal currents reduce sediment import to the bay by 20% for fine sand; transport of sediment with slower settling velocities is less affected, with reductions of 3% for medium silt and <1% for fine silt. The study examined tidal exchange with an open barrier, but the overall impact also depends on barrier operations during major storm events. The impacts of barrier infrastructure on lagoonal estuaries are distinct from other estuary types due to their modest freshwater input, predominance of tidal transport, and offshore sediment supply.

New York↗