Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70248030

Mapping stream and floodplain geomorphometry with the Floodplain and Channel Evaluation Tool

Abstract

Broad-scale mapping of stream channel and floodplain geomorphic metrics is critical to improve the understanding of geomorphic change, biogeochemical processes, riverine habitat quality, and opportunities for management intervention. The Floodplain and Channel Evaluation Tool (FACET) was developed to provide an open-source tool for automated processing of digital elevation models (DEMs) to generate regional-scale estimates of bank height, channel width, floodplain width, and a suite of other fluvial geomorphic dimensions that can be summarized at the stream reach- or catchment-scale. FACET was tested on 3-m DEMs covering the Delaware River watershed and 85% of the Chesapeake Bay watershed in the United States (U.S.) and on 1-m DEMs for a subset of the study area. Accuracy was assessed from data collected at 67 field sites in the study area. FACET successfully measured geomorphometry for over 270,000 stream reaches (88% of streams attempted) in the study area. Factors that reduced the ability of FACET to accurately estimate geomorphic metrics included errors in DEM hydro-conditioning, gradually sloping banks, incised stream channels, and the use of fixed input parameters to define buffer lengths. Even with these limitations, FACET was able to map regional patterns in stream and floodplain geomorphometry providing a robust dataset that can enhance modeling and management efforts throughout the mid-Atlantic region, U.S.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.62653336736905° to 43.03867782373945° latitude; -82.0949618969048° to -73.85224340648863° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kristina G. Hopkins, Labeeb Ahmed, Peter R. Claggett, Samuel Lamont, Marina J. Metes, Gregory B. Noe. 2023-08-31. Mapping stream and floodplain geomorphometry with the Floodplain and Channel Evaluation Tool. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13163

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Development of a SWAT+ model to improve conservation practice efficacy for protecting stream health in karst pasturelands

Placing appropriate conservation practices in critical source areas of pollutants can benefit stream health in karst environments susceptible to agricultural pollution. Watershed models, such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool+ (SWAT+), can optimize both practice selection and placement across the landscape, but to our knowledge no studies have tested this model in karst pasturelands. Our goal was to understand pollutant dynamics in pasturelands with karst topography in southwest Virginia, United States. We built a SWAT+ model to predict streamflow and pollutant loads for four watersheds. SWAT+ predicted that streamflow estimates were most affected by setting the available water capacity to zero and increasing the hydraulic conductivity of the soil, revealing that water, and associated pollutants, move primarily through subsurface pathways. Predicted sediment yield was negatively associated with agricultural land cover and was strongly influenced by channel erodibility—indicating that the predominant sediment source may be streambanks. Therefore, practices that stabilize stream banks (e.g., fencing cattle out of streams) may be most effective at reducing sediment loads. The model unsatisfactorily predicted total nitrogen and total phosphorus loads. The utility of SWAT+ for cattle grazing operations in karst regions could be improved by more accurately representing the effects of cattle grazing on streambank erosion and the dynamic subsurface movement of pollutants.

Virginia

Evaluating water-quality trends in agricultural watersheds prioritized for management-practice implementation

Many agricultural watersheds rely on the voluntary use of management practices (MPs) to reduce nonpoint source nutrient and sediment loads; however, the water-quality effects of MPs are uncertain. We interpreted water-quality responses from as early as 1985 through 2020 in three agricultural Chesapeake Bay watersheds that were prioritized for MP implementation, namely, the Smith Creek (Virginia), Upper Chester River (Maryland), and Conewago Creek (Pennsylvania) watersheds. We synthesized patterns in MPs, climate, land use, and nutrient inputs to better understand factors affecting nutrient and sediment loads. Relations between MPs and expected water-quality improvements were not consistently identifiable. The number of MPs increased in all watersheds since the early 2010s, but most monitored nutrient and sediment loads did not decrease. Nutrient and sediment loads increased or remained stable in Smith Creek and the Upper Chester River. Sediment loads and some nutrient loads decreased in Conewago Creek. In Smith Creek, a 36-year time-series model suggests that changes in manure affected flow-normalized total nitrogen loads. We hypothesize that increases in nutrient applications may overshadow some expected MP effects. MPs might have stemmed further water-quality degradation, but improvements in nutrient loads may rely on reducing manure and fertilizer applications. Our results highlight the importance of assessing MP performance with long-term monitoring-based studies.

Journal of the American Water Resources Assocation