Managing conflict between nesting common terns and herring gulls

Jeffery D. Sullivan; Amy O’Donnell; Lauren Marie-Therese Lescure; Andrew Rapp; Carl C. Callahan; Peter C. McGowan; Tim Carney; Diann J. Prosser

doi:10.1071/wr23021

USGS · 70247960

Managing conflict between nesting common terns and herring gulls

Jeffery D. Sullivan·Amy O’Donnell·Lauren Marie-Therese Lescure·Andrew Rapp·Carl C. Callahan·Peter C. McGowan·Tim Carney·Diann J. Prosser

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Context: Due to the frequent depredation of eggs and chicks by herring gulls ( Larus argentatus ), numerous approaches to reduce their impact on tern colonies have been tested by wildlife managers. Previous studies have shown that the use of overhead lines presents a promising method to prevent gull nesting in tern colonies, but little work has evaluated if this approach is suitable for excluding both nesting and non-nesting gulls. Aims: The goal of this study was to explore the efficacy of a preventative approach, overhead lines, versus a more widely practiced lethal approach, shooting and trapping. Specifically, we aimed to determine if methods differ in their abilities to deter both gull nesting and presence within treatment areas and identify impacts on common tern ( Sterna hirundo ) nesting within treatment areas. Methods: We applied separate management strategies to two common tern colonies. In one colony, we removed herring gulls via shooting followed by trapping and nest removal, and in the other colony, we erected overhead lines with subsequent trapping at nests established in the treatment area. Key results: Gulls appeared to adapt quickly to shooting efforts, limiting efficacy and resulting in no significant change in abundance from pre-treatment levels ( P = 0.981). However, gull use of both the colony and surrounding brush declined significantly ( P < 0.001) following trapping and nest removal. Meanwhile, the number of gulls in the colony area declined from a pre-treatment average of 56 to only six, following the erection of overhead lines ( P < 0.001). Although six gull nests were established within the treatment area (overhead lines), they were not replaced once the parents were trapped and nests destroyed. Conclusions: Tern nesting appeared to be unaffected by any of the implemented management activities. Our data suggest that overhead lines may present an alternative to lethal control when seeking to minimise the impacts of gulls on tern colonies. Implications: The data presented in this manuscript can be used to guide managers in selecting actions to reduce conflict between gulls and breeding common terns. By using data-informed practices, managers can select the method best suited for their specific needs and priorities.

Explore related subjects

Wildlife Research Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Jeffery D. Sullivan, Amy O’Donnell, Lauren Marie-Therese Lescure, Andrew Rapp, Carl C. Callahan, Peter C. McGowan, Tim Carney, Diann J. Prosser. 2023-08-14. Managing conflict between nesting common terns and herring gulls. https://doi.org/10.1071/wr23021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2025

Control of a dominant predator influences the occurrence of a mesocarnivore of conservation concern

Context Interspecific interactions shape ecological communities, influence community dynamics, and drive co-evolution. Despite their ecological significance, predation and competition remain understudied in plains spotted skunks ( Spilogale interrupta ), a species of conservation concern. Clarifying how predator management influences their occurrence is crucial for effective conservation. Aims We investigated how coyote ( Canis latrans ) management affects the occupancy of plains spotted skunks and whether interspecific interactions with domestic cats ( Felis catus ) and striped skunks ( Mephitis mephitis ) influence plains spotted skunk occurrence. Methods We analysed live-trap data from east-central South Dakota collected in spring of 2021 and 2022. The study area encompassed portions of counties that implemented disparate predator management regimes, including one with systematic annual coyote removal and another without. We used single-species occupancy models to estimate detection and occupancy probabilities for plains spotted skunks, domestic cats, and striped skunks, incorporating environmental factors, including the site-specific predator control regime. We then applied conditional two-species occupancy models to test whether cats and striped skunks influenced plains spotted skunk occurrence. Key results Plains spotted skunks had the lowest occupancy, followed by domestic cats, and striped skunks. Our findings showed significant associations between coyote removal and occupancy probabilities for each mesocarnivore species. Plains spotted skunks had higher occupancy in areas where coyotes were annually removed. Spotted skunk occurrence was not conditional on either domestic cat or striped skunk occurrence. Conclusions In our study system, cats appear to pose less predation risk to spotted skunks than do other predators, reducing the likelihood that cats significantly influence spotted skunk occupancy. Defensive behaviours and use of spatial refugia by plains spotted skunks may further mitigate predation risk. In addition, co-evolutionary pressures may have led to trait adaptations that facilitate the independent co-occurrence of plains spotted skunks and striped skunks. Implications Our findings highlighted the ecological consequences of predator management and the importance of considering predator–prey dynamics in conservation and management planning. Strategies aimed at conserving plains spotted skunks should integrate predator control measures while considering broader mesocarnivore community interactions.

South Dakota↗

USGS2025

Behavioral plasticity in detection height of an invasive, arboreal snake based on size, condition, and prey

Context Animals may adjust their behavior in predictable ways to balance tradeoffs between resource acquisition and survival or fecundity. Microhabitat selection based on individual traits or environmental conditions is one measure of risk–reward tradeoffs by individuals. Aims We used data from observational and manipulative studies to investigate whether an arboreal snake (brown treesnake, Boiga irregularis ) had context-dependent behavior based on the relationship between estimated prey availability, body condition, size, and detection height (microhabitat use) in two Mariana Islands. Methods We used observational data collected in four study sites and data from a manipulative study that we collected over a 5-year period. The observational data focused on four sites with different counts of three prey types, including lizards, birds, and small mammals. During the manipulative study we removed snakes, which resulted in increased prey counts over time. Using these two approaches, we tested whether prey counts predicted body condition and then evaluated how prey counts, snake size, and snake condition interactively predicted the detection height of captured individuals. Key results We found that body condition was greater at sites or in years with greater prey counts across both the observational and manipulative studies. We also found that snakes displayed differential microhabitat use based on both their condition and size. Larger snakes tended to be detected lower than smaller snakes, but only at sites or during years with few bird or small mammal counts. Snakes at sites with greater mammal and bird counts had a positive relationship between size and detection height. Snakes with greater condition scores tended to be detected higher irrespective of size, but this was also dependent on prey counts. At sites with low bird counts, snakes that were in better condition tended to be closer to the ground. Conclusions Brown treesnakes modified microhabitat use based on their condition, size, and the number or type of prey available. Our findings were consistent with a hypothesis that they optimized habitat use to secure food resources and maximize survival. Implications Context-dependent behavioral plasticity may be an important consideration for management of reptiles for population control or growth.

Wildlife Research↗

USGS2024

Mesocarnivores in residential yards: Influence of yard features on the occupancy, relative abundance, and overlap of coyotes, grey fox, and red fox

Context As conversion of natural areas to human development continues, there is a lack of information about how developed areas can sustainably support wildlife. While large predators are often extirpated from areas of human development, some medium-bodied mammalian predators (hereafter, mesocarnivores) have adapted to co-exist in human-dominated areas. Aims How human-dominated areas such as residential yards are used by mesocarnivores is not well understood. Our study aimed to identify yard and landscape features that influence occupancy, relative abundance and spatial-temporal overlap of three widespread mesocarnivores, namely, coyote ( Canis latrans ), grey fox ( Urocyon cineroargenteus ) and red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ). Methods Over the summers of 2021 and 2022, we deployed camera-traps in 46 and 96 residential yards, spanning from low-density rural areas (<1 home per km 2 ) to more urban areas (589 homes per km 2 ) in north-western Arkansas, USA. Key results We found that mesocarnivore occupancy was marginally influenced by yard-level features as opposed to landscape composition. Fences reduced the occupancy probability of coyotes, although they were positively associated with the total area of potential shelter sites in a yard. We found that relative abundance of grey fox was highest in yards with poultry, highlighting a likely source of conflict with homeowners. We found that all three species were primarily nocturnal and activity overlap between the species pairs was high. Conclusions Thus, these species may be using spatio-temporal partitioning to avoid antagonistic encounters and our data supported this, with few examples of species occurring in the same yards during the same 24-h period. Implications As the number of residential yards continues to grow, our results suggested that there are ways in which our yards can provide resources to mesocarnivores and that homeowners also have agency to mitigate overlap with mesocarnivores through management of their yard features.

Arkansas, Missouri↗