Comparison of microscopy and metabarcoding to identify pollen used by the critically endangered rusty patched bumble bee, Bombus affinis

Michael P. Simanonok; Deborah D. Iwanowicz; Clayton D. Raines; Thomas J. Wood; Rufus Isaacs; Robert S. Cornman; Clint R.V. Otto

doi:10.1111/icad.12622

USGS · 70247821

Comparison of microscopy and metabarcoding to identify pollen used by the critically endangered rusty patched bumble bee, Bombus affinis

Michael P. Simanonok·Deborah D. Iwanowicz·Clayton D. Raines·Thomas J. Wood·Rufus Isaacs·Robert S. Cornman·Clint R.V. Otto

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Taxonomic analysis of pollen collected by bees can provide insights into their host plant use, providing information about the plant species selected for targeted conservation strategies. The two main identification approaches used are morphological analysis of pollen samples affixed to microscope slides (i.e., microscopic palynology) and molecular analysis of samples. Both methods are widely used for freshly collected materials and have been compared in multiple studies, yet their application to archived samples remains to be explored. Archived samples may be particularly useful for the study of rare or protected species, particularly when historical foraging patterns are uncertain. We used both methods to analyse pollen collected by the endangered rusty patched bumble bee species, Bombus affinis Cresson, applied to museum-archived specimens. Pollen samples were removed from the corbiculae of bumble bees originally collected in Michigan between 1914 and 1974. Samples included 24 rusty patched bumble bees each with large pollen loads on both corbiculae, allowing for pollen from the same bee to be analysed using both methods. DNA metabarcoding detected more plant taxa than light microscopy, and DNA barcoding also had higher taxonomic resolution when compared to taxa determined using light microscopy. In many instances, pollen could only be confidently identified to tribe or family with light microscopy. Discrepancy between methods decreased when taxa identified via DNA metabarcoding were binned into ecologically relevant groups corresponding to those identified using light microscopy. Although binning demonstrated smaller within-method variance, there was still minimal correspondence between the two methods. Results indicate there are benefits and biases unique to each method and highlight the utility of binning taxonomic results to morphological or ecological groupings.

Explore related subjects

Insect Conservation and Diversity Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Michael P. Simanonok, Deborah D. Iwanowicz, Clayton D. Raines, Thomas J. Wood, Rufus Isaacs, Robert S. Cornman, Clint R.V. Otto. 2022-12-26. Comparison of microscopy and metabarcoding to identify pollen used by the critically endangered rusty patched bumble bee, Bombus affinis. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12622

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2025

Answering key bumble bee conservation questions by studying discovered wild nests: A Bombus affinis case study

The nesting ecology of wild bumble bees is not well resolved, but information learned from discovered nests can be of great conservation value. Data collected at nests on foraging patterns, caste-specific behaviour and health (e.g., pathogens) are invaluable for understanding bumble bee behaviour and ecology, but difficult to decipher solely from foraging observations away from the nest. Post-senescence nest excavation allows the estimation of colony size, caste numbers, documents pest incidence and provides opportunities to examine nest material for stressors (e.g., pesticides) and to use nest material for training purposes (e.g., conservation dogs). Wild nests are often found opportunistically, and there is an absence of standardised guidance on data collection. We provide an action plan to ensure the data collection is comparable across studies. This framework includes key conservation questions and methodological guidelines for both for in situ and post-season nest data collection and is ordered by increasing complexity of data collection methods. To illustrate our framework, we provide an example with recently discovered Bombus affinis (rusty patched bumble bee) nests. Through observations at B. affinis nests, we discovered novel patterns of activity, changing activity levels over time, the timing of male and gyne production, variable timing in nest senescence, and associations of nests with past rodent activity. Although individual nest discoveries may be of limited value in forwarding conservation strategies, the aggregate collections of many similar datasets can be of critical importance for species of conservation concern.

Insect Conservation and Diversity↗

USGS2023

A comparison of summer, fall and winter estimates of monarch population size before and after milkweed eradication from crop fields in North America

Measures of the area occupied by overwintering monarchs in México since the mid-1990s show a decline. Summer surveys of monarchs, however, do not show a similar decline. This discrepancy has led to the proposition that summer monarch numbers are actually stable and that increasing mortality during migration has led to declining overwintering numbers. A competing hypothesis is that this discrepancy is due to a sampling bias in the summer counts and that the summer population has declined because of the eradication of milkweed habitat from crop fields that occurred in the late 1990s through mid-2000s. We posit that the sampling bias occurred during the period when milkweeds were declining in crop fields and resulted from not sampling in the crop fields. We examined three measures of the size of the population made in the fall during migration and four summer survey measures and compared them to the overwintering measures. Counts of migrating monarchs are not expected to have this sampling bias since migrants come from all habitats, including crop fields. During the period of milkweed eradication, counts of the migrating population were correlated with the size of the overwintering population, whereas summer survey counts were not. After milkweed eradication from crop fields, all population measures were correlated with one another. These results indicate that during the pre-eradication period, summer counts were not an accurate measure of summer population size. Population trends observed at the overwintering site reflect factors, principally milkweed loss, that affect summer population size.

Insect Conservation and Diversity↗

USGS2019

Comparing grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) communities on tallgrass prairie reconstructions and remnants in Missouri

Tallgrass prairies, which once occupied a large swath of central North America, face the combined challenges of habitat loss and fragmentation. In Missouri, where less than 1% the historical prairie remains, prairies are being reconstructed from agricultural or wooded land. Invertebrates are often assumed to colonise reconstructions if native vegetation returns; however, the limited mobility of many invertebrates, the isolation of many tallgrass remnants, and the difficulty in establishing prairie plants raise serious questions as to whether invertebrate communities on reconstructed prairies are and will be equivalent to those found on remnant prairies. Grasshoppers (Acrididae) display a range of dispersal capabilities and may be valuable for assessing the success of prairie restoration for invertebrates. Our first objective was to compare grasshopper communities on reconstructed and remnant prairies and, if differences existed, identify species or functional groups associated with each habitat type. The second objective was to evaluate the effect of time because prairie reconstruction on grasshopper communities to determine if communities on reconstructions are converging with communities on remnants. Our results suggest that prairie reconstructions in Missouri do not support the same communities of grasshoppers as prairie remnants. Grasshopper diversity was generally greater on remnants. Many species had not colonised nearby reconstructions. Communities on prairie reconstructions were characterised by a few long-winged, generalist species that are typically successful in agroecosystems. Further investigation into the habitat disparities driving low grasshopper diversity on reconstructions could help restore the grasshopper community of reconstructions.

Insect Conservation and Diversity↗