Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70242952

Upper Triassic Barranca Group; Nonmarine and shallow-marine rift-basin deposits of northwestern Mexico

John H. Stewart·Jaime Roldan-Quintana
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The 3,000-m-thick Upper Triassic Barranca Group in the Sierra de San Javier in east-central Sonora, Mexico, is composed, in ascending order, of the Arrayanes, Santa Clara, and Coyotes Formations. The Arrayanes and Santa Clara Formations are composed of fluvial and marine-delta deposits of quartzose and arkosic sandstone, conglomerate, shale, and siltstone; the Santa Clara Formation includes minor amounts of coal and tuff. A sharp contact (perhaps an unconformity) separates the Santa Clara Formation from the overlying Coyotes Formation. The Coyotes consists of alluvial-fan deposits of pebble-to-boulder conglomerate. Paleocurrents were southward during deposition of the Arrayanes and Santa Clara Formations and southwestward during deposition of the Coyotes Formation, assuming that no major post-deposition tectonic rotation has occurred. The Santa Clara Formation has been dated paleontologically as Late Triassic; the age of the entire group is unknown, but is commonly assumed to also be Late Triassic. The Barranca Group in the Sierra de San Javier rests unconformably on a sequence of eugeosynclinal chert, argillite, quartzite, and carbonate rock of Paleozoic age, and is unconformably overlain by the Tarahumara Volcanics, which have been dated no more precisely than latest Triassic to earliest Cenozoic. The thick, coarse, and laterally variable deposits of the Barranca Group indicate deposition in a basin, or basins, flanked by areas of high relief. Much of the Barranca in Sonora appears to have been deposited in a single basin, which is delineated by the occurrence of major outcrops of the Barranca Group in an east-west-trending belt about 110 km long and 40 km wide. The elongate shape of this basin and the interpretation of flanking areas of high relief suggests a basin of rift origin. If so, the Barranca Group is part of a broad zone of rift-related Upper Triassic sequences in northern Mexico that apparently formed by transtensional and/or extensional faulting.

Explore related subjects

Special Papers of the Geological Society of AmericaBook chapter
90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 28.25118850584873° to 29.305530961822583° latitude; -111.2169189607509° to -109.0924751899056° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John H. Stewart, Jaime Roldan-Quintana. 1991-01-01. Upper Triassic Barranca Group; Nonmarine and shallow-marine rift-basin deposits of northwestern Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1130/spe254-p19

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2022

A refined assessment of the paleoceanographic and tectonic influences on the deposition of the Monterey Formation in California

Application of updated diatom biochronology to the Monterey Formation and related biosiliceous rocks reveals the imprint of both global paleoclimatic/ paleoceanographic and regional tectonic events. A rise in global sea level combined with regional tectonic deepening associated with the development of the transform California margin resulted in the abrupt onset of deposition of fine-grained Monterey sediments between 18 and 16 Ma. The base of the Monterey does not mark a silica shift in diatom deposition from the North Atlantic to the North Pacific. Rather, a North Atlantic decline of diatoms after ~13 Ma and increasing divergence in nutrient levels between the North Atlantic and North Pacific between ~13 and 11 Ma, coincided with a major enhancement of diatom deposition in the Monterey Formation. A stratigraphically condensed interval of phosphate-rich sediments between 13 and 10 Ma in coastal southern California appears to have resulted from sediment starvation on offshore banks during a period of higher sea level, as inland sections commonly contain thick sequences of diatomaceous sediment. Increasing latitudinal thermal gradients in the latest Miocene, which triggered a biogenic bloom in the equatorial Pacific at 8 Ma, also lead to enhanced diatom deposition in the uppermost Monterey and overlying biosiliceous rocks. Uplift of the California coastal ranges after ~5.2 Ma resulted in an increasing detrital contribution that obscured the presence of diatoms in onshore sediments. Major reduction in coastal upwelling in the early Pliocene at ~4.6 Ma caused a drastic reduction of diatoms in sediments of offshore southern California.

California↗
USGS2021

Middle and late Pleistocene pluvial history of Newark Valley, central Nevada, USA

Newark Valley lies between the two largest pluvial lake systems in the Great Basin, Lake Lahontan and Lake Bonneville. Soils and geomorphology, stratigraphic interpretations, radiocarbon ages, and amino acid racemization geochronology analyses were employed to interpret the relative and numerical ages of lacustrine deposits in the valley. The marine oxygen isotope stage (MIS) 2 beach barriers are characterized by well-preserved morphology and deposits with youthful soil development, with Bwk horizons and maximum stage I+ carbonate morphology. Radiocarbon ages of gastropods and tufas within these MIS 2–age deposits permit construction of a latest Pleistocene lake-level curve for Newark Valley, including a maximum limiting age of 13,780 ± 50 14 C yr B.P. for the most recent highstand, and they provide a calibration point for soil development in lacustrine deposits in the central Great Basin. The MIS 8–age to MIS 4–age beach barriers are higher in elevation and represent a larger lake than existed during MIS 2. The beach barriers have subdued morphology, are only preserved in short segments, and have stronger soil development, with Bkm and/or Bkmt horizons and maximum stage III+ to IV carbonate morphology. Newark Lake reached elevations higher than the MIS 2 highstand during at least two additional pluvial periods, MIS 16 and MIS 12, 10, or 8. These oldest lacustrine deposits do not have preserved shoreline features and are represented only by gravel lags, buried deposits, and buried soils with similar strong soil development. This sequence of middle and latest Pleistocene shorelines records a long-term pluvial history in this basin that remained internally drained for the last four or more pluvial cycles. Obtaining numerical ages from material within lacustrine deposits in the Great Basin can be challenging. Amino acid D/L values from gastropod shells and mollusk valves proved to be a valuable tool to correlate lacustrine deposits within Newark Valley. Comparison of soils and geomorphology results to independent 36 Cl cosmogenic nuclide ages from a different study indicated unexpected changes in rates of soil development during the past ~200,000 yr and suggested that common stratigraphic changes in lake stratigraphy could obscure incremental changes in soil development and/or complicate 36 Cl cosmogenic nuclide age estimates.

Nevada↗
USGS2019

Don Swanson: A field volcanology career worth celebrating

Don Swanson has profoundly influenced generations of volcanologists and has made major contributions to our understanding of both silicic and basaltic volcanic systems. He provides an exceptional example of how a gifted scientist can develop entirely new paradigms related to large-scale problems on the basis of decades of study, as exemplified by his work on the emplacement of flood basalts, monitoring and forecasting volcanic eruptions, the development of lava flows and domes, and the explosive nature of Kīlauea Volcano. Don has maintained exceptional productivity even while playing major leadership and management roles in science, and his research is intrinsically geological and rooted in painstaking fieldwork that is both collaborative and interdisciplinary. This volume recognizes Don’s career accomplishments by emphasizing his careful approach to volcanology and highlighting meticulous field observations as the basis for better understanding how volcanoes work.

Special Papers of the Geological Society of Americ↗