Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70240651

Plan for living on a restless planet sets NASA's solid Earth agenda

Abstract

What are the most important challenges facing solid Earth science today and over the next two decades? And what is the best approach for NASA, in partnership with other agencies, to address those challenges? A new report, Living on a Restless Planet, provides a blueprint for answering these questions. The top priority for a new spacecraft mission in the area of solid Earth science over the next 5 years, according to this report, is a satellite dedicated to Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR). At the request of NASA, the Solid Earth Science Working Group (SESWG) developed a strategy for the highest priority objectives in solid Earth science for the space agency over the next 25 years. The strategy addresses six challenges that are of fundamental scientific importance, have strong implications for society, and are amenable to substantial progress through a concerted series of scientific observations from space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sean C. Solomon, Victor R. Baker, Jeremy Bloxham, Jeffrey Booth, Andrea Donnellan, Charles Elachi, Diane Evans, Eric Rignot, Douglas W. Burbank, Benjamin F. Chao, Alan D. Chave, Alan R. Gillespie, Thomas A. Herring, Raymond Jeanloz, John L. LaBrecque, J. Bernard Minster, Walter C. Pitman, Mark Simons, Donald L. Turcotte, Mary Lou C. Zoback. 2011-06-03. Plan for living on a restless planet sets NASA's solid Earth agenda. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003eo450001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Credit where credit is due

Credit is the currency of science. Scientists are evaluated and promoted in their jobs and professional communities on the basis of their recognized contributions to science. Unlike a financial contribution, a scientific contribution is difficult to measure. Traditionally, credit for scientific contributions has been given through authorship and citations in scientific literature as well as awards and the naming of geographic features, instruments, and methods and other honorifics. However, these practices do not capture the breadth and depth of the contributions by all actors in modern, open science.

Eos Science News