USGS · 70228632
Explaining support for mandatory versus voluntary conservation actions among waterfowlers
Abstract
Personal conservation behavior and compliance with natural resource regulations are important to wildlife conservation. We examined how waterfowl hunting involvement, motivations, satisfaction, and experience, along with institutional trust and demographics, correlated with support for waterfowl regulations and personal conservation actions. Regulations included zones, splits, and motorized decoys, while conservation behaviors addressed hunter recruitment, along with donations, volunteering, and voting in ways to support wildlife conservation. Results suggested that agency trust was positively related to support for regulations but negatively related to personal conservation behaviors. An increased orientation to harvest waterfowl was negatively related to both support for regulations and conservation behaviors. Education, income, Ducks Unlimited membership, and days hunting were positively related to personal conservation behavior. Results may help managers work cooperatively with hunters and conservation groups to support wildlife conservation.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Susan A. Schroeder, Louis J Cornicelli, David C. Fulton, Adam Landon, Leslie McInenly, Steve Cordts. 2020-10-18. Explaining support for mandatory versus voluntary conservation actions among waterfowlers. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1830205
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.