Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70228350

Low survey response! Can I still use the data?

Larry M. Gigliotti·Seth Fompa
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Natural resource agencies often use mail surveys to collect stakeholder information. However, a major concern of mail surveys have long been relatively low response rates compared to telephone or face-to-face interviews. Survey research has largely focused on achieving high response rates; however, in some situations even well designed surveys can have low response rates. We present an example of a 3-page (25 questions) survey measuring opinions and attitudes about native fish management in the South Dakota Black Hills region that received a relatively low response rate (21%) using a mailing, postcard, and second mailing of the questionnaire. We compare response rate and data quality of a third mailing of the full questionnaire with a one-page (5 questions) questionnaire measuring key variables to evaluate possible nonresponse bias. Within the total survey error (TSE) paradigm we provide evidence that reliable and useful information was collected by this survey.

Explore related subjects

Human Dimensions of WildlifeArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Larry M. Gigliotti, Seth Fompa. 2018. Low survey response! Can I still use the data?. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1523508

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Perceptions of relational organizing as a tool for human–bear coexistence

Conflict between humans and American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) is a growing concern in North America, especially in wildland–urban interfaces. Beyond ecological drivers, conflict reduction relies on changing human behavior. Neighbor-to-neighbor conversations, also known as relational organizing, may drive social diffusion of coexistence actions. However, little research has explored the behavioral conditions enabling (a) residents to initiate conversations and (b) neighbors to listen and adopt bear-safe practices. Using the capability, opportunity, motivations and behavior (COM-B) framework, we analyzed 34 semi-structured interviews with engaged residents in two western U.S. communities with ongoing coexistence efforts. Results highlight that interviewees have heterogeneous knowledge and skills (capability), are committed to leveraging interpersonal relationships but concerned about protecting these relationships (social opportunity), feel more able to engage in relational organizing with enabling programmatic support and regulatory frameworks (physical opportunity), and are motivated by identity, emotion, and beliefs about consequences.

Colorado, Montana↗
USGS2026

Political identity predicts hunting occurrence on private land

Understanding the factors that predict whether hunting occurs on private land is vital for effective wildlife management. In this exploratory study, we surveyed non-industrial landowners ( n = 855) along an urban-to-rural gradient in Durham County, North Carolina, to examine how political identity and several socio-demographic and geographic variables predict hunting occurrence on private property. Standardized comparisons (|ln(SOR)|) indicated that road density was the strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.994), with hunting less likely in higher road-density areas. Age was the second strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.469), with hunting more likely on properties owned by older landowners. Political identity was the third strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.393), with hunting less likely on properties owned by landowners with more liberal political identities. These results illustrate that structural landscape features and socio-political factors shape hunting occurrence, and that customizing stakeholder engagement to align with landowner political identity may improve hunting access on private land.

North Carolina↗
USGS2026

Engaging adult R3 outdoor educational program design to strengthen participation in hunting and fishing

Declining participation in hunting and fishing has been slowed by women who are learning numerous outdoor skills through recruitment, retention, and reactivation [R3] programs. R3 programs are hosted by state agencies, non-governmental organizations, and businesses that take a variety of approaches to develop participant skills and confidence. To understand how R3 program design influences hunting and fishing participation, we conducted 11 focus group interviews with 72 participants at women’s R3 programs to identify program design components that women appreciate when learning to hunt and fish. Well-designed programs offered customized educational approaches to align with participants’ needs, created a supportive environment to foster a sense of belonging, and streamlined participation through event logistics. Programs that incorporated these design components promoted skill development, boosted self-confidence, and helped participants build a supportive network to independently hunt and fish. Program leaders can apply these findings to bolster participation in hunting and fishing.

Human Dimensions of Wildlife↗