Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities

J. Badham; Sondoss Elsawah; Joseph H. A. Guillaume; Serena H Hamilton; Randall J. Hunt; Anthony J. Jakeman; Suzanne A Pierce; Meghna Babbar-Sebens; Baihua Fu; Patricia Gober; Mary C Hill; Takuya Iwanaga; Daniel P Loucks; Wendy S. Merritt; Scott D Peckham; Amy K Richmond; Fateme Zare; Daniel P. Ames; Gabriele Bammer

doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013

USGS · 70217885

Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities

J. Badham·Sondoss Elsawah·Joseph H. A. Guillaume·Serena H Hamilton·Randall J. Hunt·Anthony J. Jakeman·Suzanne A Pierce·Meghna Babbar-Sebens·Baihua Fu·Patricia Gober·Mary C Hill·Takuya Iwanaga·Daniel P Loucks·Wendy S. Merritt·Scott D Peckham·Amy K Richmond·Fateme Zare·Daniel P. Ames·Gabriele Bammer

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The effectiveness of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) modeling hinges on the quality of practices employed through the process, starting from early problem definition all the way through to using the model in a way that serves its intended purpose. The adoption and implementation of effective modeling practices need to be guided by a practical understanding of the variety of decisions that modelers make, and the information considered in making these choices. There is still limited documented knowledge on the modeling workflow , and the role of contextual factors in determining this workflow and which practices to employ. This paper attempts to contribute to this knowledge gap by providing systematic guidance of the modeling practices through the phases (Planning, Development, Application, and Perpetuation) and steps that comprise the modeling process, positing questions that should be addressed. Practice-focused guidance helps explain the detailed process of conducting IWRM modeling, including the role of contextual factors in shaping practices. We draw on findings from literature and the authors’ collective experience to articulate what and how contextual factors play out in employing those practices. In order to accelerate our learning about how to improve IWRM modeling, the paper concludes with five key areas for future practice-related research: knowledge sharing, overcoming data limitations, informed stakeholder involvement, social equity and uncertainty management.

Explore related subjects

Environmental Modelling & Software Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J. Badham, Sondoss Elsawah, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Serena H Hamilton, Randall J. Hunt, Anthony J. Jakeman, Suzanne A Pierce, Meghna Babbar-Sebens, Baihua Fu, Patricia Gober, Mary C Hill, Takuya Iwanaga, Daniel P Loucks, Wendy S. Merritt, Scott D Peckham, Amy K Richmond, Fateme Zare, Daniel P. Ames, Gabriele Bammer. 2019. Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Multivariate SWAT streamflow and surface water storage calibration enables upper Mississippi River Basin wetland change scenarios

Surface water storage (e.g., wetlands, lakes) is not typically considered in hydrological model calibrations. We tested a multivariate calibration process, incorporating Sentinel-1 and -2 surface water storage, for a Soil and Water Assessment Tool model across the 0.5 million km 2 Upper Mississippi River Basin. While 19% of the 2000 parameter sets adequately simulated discharge (Kling-Gupta efficiency >0.5), only 5% also adequately simulated surface water storage (mean absolute error <2 m), reducing model output uncertainty. Using the best calibrated model, we found that changes in surface water storage capacity most strongly affected discharge during the first annual peak flow (i.e., floods), when storage was filling. Increases in upstream surface water storage capacity resulted in projected decreases in peak flow and flashiness, with changes persisting downstream to the watershed outlet. Our findings demonstrate the importance of surface water storage in multivariate model calibration processes to inform river discharge and flood impact predictions.

Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisc↗

USGS2025

METRIC: An interactive framework for integrated visualization and analysis of monitored and expected load reductions for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Reductions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment loads have been the focus of watershed restoration in many regions for improving water quality, including the Chesapeake Bay. Watershed models and riverine monitoring data can provide important information on the progress of load reductions but do not always generate consistent interpretations. A new framework for integrated visualization and analysis of monitoring and modeling data, named “Monitored and Expected Total Reduction Indicator for the Chesapeake (METRIC),” was developed to provide spatially explicit trends for the subwatersheds of the Chesapeake Bay. METRIC contains up-to-date information on nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment at 83, 66, and 66 stations, respectively, which can help watershed managers gauge expectations on the trajectory and pace of progress at localized scales. These results were further synthesized to better understand the spatial patterns of the response classes ( i.e. , agreement between the expected and monitored trends) across the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Chesapeake Bay watershed↗

USGS2025

Evaluation of daily stream temperature predictions (1979-2021) across the contiguous United States using a spatiotemporal aware machine learning algorithm

Stream temperature controls a variety of physical and biological processes that affect ecosystems, human health, and economic activities. We used 42 years (1979–2021) of data to predict daily summary statistics of stream temperature across >50,000 stream reaches in the contiguous United States using a recurrent graph convolution network. We comprehensively documented the performance – both across all reaches and by stream type (e.g., reservoir or groundwater influence) – as a baseline for future improvement. The model showed reach-level RMSE of <2 °C with 90 % prediction intervals that contain 90.7 % of observations. We also assessed how the model captured variability in ecologically relevant metrics (e.g., R 2 for annual 7-day maximum = 0.76; R 2 for days exceeding 25 °C = 0.75). This model does not outperform state-of-the-art machine learning efforts (e.g., RMSE ≤1.5 °C) due to a limited input set but does provide the most spatially complete modeling to date to support water availability assessments.

contiguous United States↗