Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70216425

Soil moisture product validation good practices protocol, version 1.0

Carsten Montzka·Michael H. Cosh·Bagher Bayat·Ahmad Al Bitar·Aaron Berg·Rajat Bindlish·Heye Reemt Bogena·John D. Bolton·Francois Cabot·Todd Caldwell·Steven Chan·Andreas Colliander·Wade Crow·Narendra Das·Gabrielle De Lannoy·Wouter Dorigo·Steven R. Evett·Alexander Gruber·Sebastian Hahn·Thomas Jagdhuber·Scott F. Jones·Yann Kerr·Seung-bum Kim·Christian Koyama·Mehmed Kurum·Ernesto Lopez-Baeza·Francesco Mattia·Kaighin A. McColl·Susanne Mecklenburg·Binayak Mohanty·Peggy O’Neill·Dani Or·Thierry Pellarin·George P. Petropoulos·Maria Piles·Rolf H. Reichle·Nemesio Rodriguez-Fernandez·Christoph Rudiger·Tracy Scanlon·Robert C. Schwartz·Daniel Spengler·Prashant K. Srivastava·Swati Suman·Robin van der Schalie·Wolfgang Wagner·Urs Wegmuller·Jean-Pierre Wigneron·Fernando Camacho·Jaime Nickeson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) included soil moisture in the list of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) to express its important role in Earth’s water, energy and carbon cycle. Soil moisture has a major impact on agriculture, land surface hydrology, weather, and climate forecasting. This document is a community-based effort to provide recommendations on good practices for the validation of global to regional soil moisture products. Definitions are given and metrics to adequately describe the quality of soil moisture products are presented. Spaceborne active and passive microwave sensors are listed with their characteristics, and the typical soil moisture retrieval methods are explained, including dielectric mixing models and optical methods. Spatial scaling, root zone soil moisture estimation, and operational implementations are addressed, as these issues continue to gain more and more importance. Standard and advanced in situ measurement techniques are described as well as sensor calibration, spatial representativity, sampling strategies, and the benefit of airborne campaigns.The community has agreed upon the utilization of the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) as the main online repository for in situ soil moisture measurements. Different validation methods such as ground-based validation, satellite product intercomparison, and time series analyses are presented. We provide strategies to evaluate the long-term quality of soil moisture products, and give advice on how to handle typical temporal and spatial-scale mismatches and how to effectively report validation results. Moreover, the benefit of blind tests is discussed to gain objective validation results. We encourage data providers, scientists and practitioners to use this Soil Moisture Product Validation Good Practices Protocol to provide, analyze, and improve high quality Earth Observation results.

Explore related subjects

Report

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carsten Montzka, Michael H. Cosh, Bagher Bayat, Ahmad Al Bitar, Aaron Berg, Rajat Bindlish, Heye Reemt Bogena, John D. Bolton, Francois Cabot, Todd Caldwell, Steven Chan, Andreas Colliander, Wade Crow, Narendra Das, Gabrielle De Lannoy, Wouter Dorigo, Steven R. Evett, Alexander Gruber, Sebastian Hahn, Thomas Jagdhuber, Scott F. Jones, Yann Kerr, Seung-bum Kim, Christian Koyama, Mehmed Kurum, Ernesto Lopez-Baeza, Francesco Mattia, Kaighin A. McColl, Susanne Mecklenburg, Binayak Mohanty, Peggy O’Neill, Dani Or, Thierry Pellarin, George P. Petropoulos, Maria Piles, Rolf H. Reichle, Nemesio Rodriguez-Fernandez, Christoph Rudiger, Tracy Scanlon, Robert C. Schwartz, Daniel Spengler, Prashant K. Srivastava, Swati Suman, Robin van der Schalie, Wolfgang Wagner, Urs Wegmuller, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Fernando Camacho, Jaime Nickeson. 2020. Soil moisture product validation good practices protocol, version 1.0. https://doi.org/10.5067/doc%2Fceoswgcv%2Flpv%2Fsm.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Factors affecting benthic macroinvertebrate health in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, 2020–2023

Major waterways in the City of Roanoke (City) have failed to meet Virginia’s aquatic life designated use since 1996. Segments of the upper Roanoke River lack healthy benthic macroinvertebrate communities which prompted a total maximum daily load (TMDL) study by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) to identify the most probable stressor(s) causing the impairment. Excess fine sediment was identified as the most probable stressor impairing benthic macroinvertebrates on portions of the Roanoke River in 2006, and a watershed implementation plan published in 2016 required communities within the impaired watershed to implement projects that would reduce the load of fine sediment entering the Roanoke River. Additional benthic macroinvertebrate sampling and stream habitat assessments along the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek (a tributary to the Roanoke River that flows through the City) revealed continued impaired conditions, and subsequent stressor identification analysis was completed in 2023. Samples collected downstream of the City on the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek generally showed more impaired conditions relative to samples collected at locations upstream of the City. Based on this evaluation, sediment and sediment-bound polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were identified as probable stressors while specific conductance, total nitrogen, and sediment metals were possible stressors in Tinker Creek; however, only a sediment TMDL target was identified to address impaired benthic macroinvertebrate communities. In the Roanoke River upstream of the Niagara Dam, sediment and total phosphorus were identified as probable stressors, sediment polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and sediment PCB were considered possible stressors; however, the TMDL target was only for total phosphorus. The City partnered with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in 2016 to continuously monitor water quality and streamflow conditions on a major tributary of Tinker Creek, Lick Run, and by 2020, four similar monitoring stations were installed on the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek near the locations of benthic macroinvertebrate sampling. Monitored parameters included streamflow and/or gage height (water level), water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, and turbidity. Turbidity is a measure of the relative clarity of the water and was previously used to model suspended-sediment concentrations at the monitoring stations. The City also contracted Kirk Environmental, LLP (KE) to collect benthic macroinvertebrate samples and stream habitat assessments near the locations of the water-quality monitoring stations. Identified benthic macroinvertebrates were used to calculate the Virginia Stream Condition Index (SCI), a multi-metric index composed of eight biological attributes that represent elements of the structure and function of the benthic macroinvertebrate community that measure diversity, composition, and tolerance to pollution. Study objective: In this report, benthic macroinvertebrate samples and stream habitat assessment scores collected at four locations on the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek by KE and the VDEQ between 2020 and 2023 were compared to measured water-quality and streamflow conditions prior to sampling to evaluate patterns between benthic macroinvertebrate health, water quality, and hydrology.

Virginia↗