Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70216104

Assessment of burrowing behavior of freshwater juvenile mussels in sediment

Nile E. Kemble·John M. Besser·Jeffery A. Steevens·Jamie P. Hughes
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Standard laboratory sediment toxicity methods have been adapted for conducting toxicity tests with juvenile freshwater mussels. However, studies looking at juvenile mussel burrowing behavior at the water-sediment interface are limited. Juvenile mussels burrow in sediment for the first 0 to 4 yr of life but also may inhabit the sediment-water interface. The objective of this study was to evaluate burrowing behavior of various species and ages of juvenile freshwater mussels in three control sediments: West Bearskin Lake, Spring River, and coarse commercial sand. Species tested included (1) Fatmucket ( Lampsilis siliquoidea ), (2) Notched Rainbow ( Villosa constricta ), (3) Washboard ( Megalonaias nervosa ), (4) Rainbow ( Villosa iris) , (5) Arkansas Fatmucket ( Lampsilis powellii ), and (6) Oregon Floater ( Anodonta oregonensis ). Greater than 95% of the mussels burrowed into test sediment within 15 min. Across species, life stage, and substrate type, most mussels were recovered from the upper layers of sediment (91% at a sediment depth of 3.4 mm or less), and only 2% of the mussels were recovered at a depth >5.1 mm. No mussels were recovered from a depth >6.8 mm. There was no difference in mussel burrowing depth at 4 h versus 24 h across species, age, and sediment type. Two ages of Fatmucket burrowed to a significantly greater depth in the West Bearskin Lake sediment compared to the Spring River sediment or Coarse Sand. However, there was no significant difference in mean depth across sediment type with the other five species of mussels tested. Based on species and age of mussels tested, juvenile mussels up to an age of at least 20 wk and a length of at least 5 mm readily burrow into sediment and likely would be exposed to contaminants in whole sediment and associated pore water throughout a laboratory sediment toxicity test.

Explore related subjects

Freshwater Mollusk Biology and ConservationArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nile E. Kemble, John M. Besser, Jeffery A. Steevens, Jamie P. Hughes. 2020. Assessment of burrowing behavior of freshwater juvenile mussels in sediment. https://doi.org/10.31931/fmbc.v23i2.2020.69-81

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Characterization of the native freshwater mussel assemblage across a reach of the Rappahannock River, Virginia

Native freshwater mussels occur in rivers of all sizes, yet much of the literature focuses on small- to medium-sized rivers, likely because of logistic challenges of sampling deep, fast, and turbid large rivers. As large-river surveys become more common, the information resulting from a systematic sampling design can provide baseline data on population sizes to inform decision making by resource managers. We collected baseline data on mussel resources in the Rappahannock River, Virginia, in August 2024. This Atlantic coast river, which drains into the Chesapeake Bay, is ∼320 km long, up to 1.6 km wide, and up to 35 m deep. We conducted a systematic quantitative survey across the 75-km reach of the river from Fredericksburg to Leedstown, Virginia. Divers obtained 187 whole substrate samples to estimate the species richness, density, population size, size distribution, community composition, and longitudinal spatial distribution of the native mussel assemblage. Six species were found, and the community was dominated by Eastern Elliptio ( Elliptio complanata ). Mean reach density (± 1 standard error) and population size was 1.25 (0.21) mussels m 22 and 19.3 (3.3) million mussels, respectively. The presence of few fresh dead mussels indicated low to moderate natural mortality. Shell length ranged from 32 to 122 mm, and multiple size classes were observed in E. complanata . Species richness and density had similar longitudinal patterns, with the highest values in the middle of the sampled reach (river kilometers 60–95). These data provide resource managers with baseline information on the spatial distribution, density, length demography, diversity, and evenness of native freshwater mussels across this reach of the Rappahannock River. Identification of mussel occurrence, density, and evidence of reproduction can be used by managers to aid conservation and management decisions such as prioritizing areas for reintroductions and habitat restoration.

Virginia↗
USGS2025

Pit tag application in native freshwater mussels: Case studies across small, medium, and large rivers

Since their first use in the mid-1980s, external passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags have facilitated innovative investigations into multiple biological traits of animals. For native freshwater mussels, PIT tags are frequently used in capture-mark-recapture applications because they allow repeated, noninvasive sampling, are easy to apply, have high retention rates, and have negligible short-term effects on growth and survival. Because of these traits, resource managers and scientists are using PIT-tagged animals to estimate survival and movement of mussels associated with restoration efforts. However, consistency is limited in how PIT tags are affixed, monitored, and reported. Thus, our objectives were to (1) share our collective experiences in PIT tagging mussels across three case studies in small, medium, and large rivers and (2) propose guidelines for tagging and reporting data from PIT tag studies with native freshwater mussels to facilitate comparisons across future studies. The number of studies that have marked mussels with PIT tags has increased over the past 10 years. The ability to detect mussels using PIT tags has substantially advanced research in three areas of mussel ecology: (1) estimating vital rates (e.g., growth and survival), (2) tracking movements and behaviors of captively propagated, wild, and translocated individuals, and (3) improving our understanding of life history traits, such as reproductive timing. Each case study offers insights on tagging methods, tag loss, tag retention, and monitoring frequency across multiple species that range in conservation status from common to rare. We conclude with best-practice guidelines for placing PIT tags on freshwater mussels and a list of variables that could be reported in future studies to facilitate cross-system comparisons.

Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation↗
USGS2024

Assessing potential habitat for freshwater mussels by transferring a habitat suitability model within the Ozark Ecoregion, Missouri

Habitat suitability models for freshwater mussels can inform conservation of these imperiled animals. Riverscape-scale hydrogeomorphic variables were previously used to predict suitable mussel habitat in the Meramec River basin, Missouri. We evaluated transferability of the Meramec River habitat suitability model to the Gasconade and Little Black rivers, in the Ozark Highlands ecoregion, Missouri. The best-fit models relied on transferring and adapting the original modeling framework to better represent the unique habitat characteristics of each river. Mussel bed occurrence in both rivers was associated with reaches that were classified as pools. Mussel beds in the Gasconade River were also associated with laterally stable reaches adjacent to small bluffs, distant from gravel bars, and with higher stream power indices. Mussel beds in the Little Black River were associated with reaches with higher surface water availability during low-flow conditions, lower stream power indices, and bluffs located downstream. Our results show that existing habitat models can be transferred to other streams with similar environmental conditions, but differences in watershed characteristics can affect transferability.

Missouri↗