Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70211918

Reconnaissance study of erosion and deposition produced by the flood of August 1955 in Connecticut

Abstract

A large area in the valley bottoms in Connecticut was inundated by the flood of August 1955. Relative to the total area flooded that part permanently modified by the flow was surprisingly small. Although great in some places, the distribution of these permanent modifications of channel and flood plain was spotty. Erosion of the channel and valley bottom appears to have been most severe in narrow, steep valleys. Environments of deposition were diverse. They appeared to be related to rate and direction of flow, quantity and size of sediments locally available, and in some cases to the presence of vegetation. Most of the coarse sediment deposited in the valley appears to have been derived from local sources such as valley walls and terraces composed of glacial outwash and till and flood plains containing considerable gravel. Fine sand predominated in most of the sediment deposited. Considering the magnitude of the runoff, the quantity of fine sediment transported or deposited by the flood was small. The maximum observed concentration was 473 parts per million in Scantic River at Broad Brook. Newly deposited fine sediments are thin or absent on the flood plains of many valleys which were beneath 20 ft of slow‐moving flood waters. The paucity of deposition in such ideal depositional environments also indicates that the flow did not have a high concentration of fine sediments. A number of boulders five to seven feet in diameter were moved by flood waters in reaches in which smaller gravels were undisturbed. Severe erosion in the uplands was minor. In this reconnaissance we saw little evidence of newly formed gullies and no areas of severe sheet erosion. This was the case in both woodland and pasture land. Large amounts of subsurface flow and relatively unerodible ground are presumed to be responsible for the absence of erosion.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 40.985171° to 42.050587° latitude; -73.727775° to -71.786994° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. Gordon Wolman, J.P. Eiler. 2014-08-18. Reconnaissance study of erosion and deposition produced by the flood of August 1955 in Connecticut. https://doi.org/10.1029/tr039i001p00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Better approaches to managing drought in the American Southwest

The second in a series of USGS Southwest Region (SWR) “Science Exchange” annual workshops, focused on USGS drought science. The participants considered how extreme drought conditions are evolving in much of the American southwest, with an emphasis on integrated drought science planning at the USGS bureau and program levels. The increased need for interdisciplinary science to support resource-management decisions systems, was highlighted. The workshop brought together scientists and program managers from USGS with Bureau of Land Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Bureau of Reclamation and state water management departments. Key objectives of the workshop were to improve awareness of ongoing drought-science work within the region, highlight the capabilities of USGS-SWR science centers in drought science, and build new relationships to advance best approaches in drought science. Topics covered in presentations and demonstrations were broad-ranging and included monitoring for drought early warning; water use and water production associated with petroleum production; paleo perspectives on drought, and ecological consequences of drought to native fish.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

Defining opportunities for collaboration across data life cycles

Monitoring natural resources - water, forests, and animal populations—is required to support effective management of natural resources. However, because monitoring activities are often specific to a discipline, issue, or agency, it is typically difficult to integrate data to answer questions that transcend geopolitical and jurisdictional boundaries. How do we reach the better data integration we need?

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union

Coastal fog, climate change, and the environment

Coastal marine fog, a characteristic feature of climates generated at the eastern boundaries of ocean basins worldwide, evokes different feelings in those who experience it (see Figure 1). Authors and poets use fog to represent mystery, bleakness, and confusion. Film directors seek out fog to shroud scenes in eerie gloominess. Tourists visiting beaches bemoan the cool and damp conditions that create a striking contrast to the sunny warm conditions typically found less than a few kilometers inland. Airline passengers delayed by fog impatiently wait for the skies to clear. Residents get used to the Sun “rising” in midday after fog dissipates.

Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union