Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70210535

Acris blanchardi (Blanchard's Cricket Frog), Predation

Abstract

Invertebrates are well-known predators of amphibians with many documented cases of spiders preying upon anurans (reviewed in Toledo 2005. Herpetol. Rev. 36:395–400). Wolf spiders are known to feed on a variety of frogs, including those in the genus Acris (Blackburn et al. 2002. Herpetol. Rev. 33:299). Although typically terrestrial, wolf spiders have been found feeding on arboreal frogs ca. 1 m above the ground (Aucone and Card 2002. Herpetol. Rev. 33:48). To our knowledge, no records exist of a wolf spider feeding on a terrestrial frog at an elevated height. At 0113 h on 30 April 2019, we observed an adult female wolf spider (Tigrosa georgicola: Lycosidae) feeding on an adult Acris blanchardi ca. 1.5 m high on the trunk of a small tree at the edge of a pond in Sherburne Wildlife Management Area, St. Martin Parish, Louisiana, USA (30.424°N, 91.663°W; WGS 84; Fig. 1). The spider was positioned facing the ground and the partially digested frog was hanging from its mouthparts. The spider likely captured the frog on the ground near the edge of the water and retreated up the tree with its meal (Fig. 1B). Movement of spiders with prey from an initial point of capture is documented in wolf spiders (Aucone and Card 2002, op. cit.) and other large terrestrial spiders (Maffei et al. 2010. Herpetol. Notes 3:167–170). This behavior may minimize the vulnerability of the spider to predators. We thank Zack Lemann, Curator of Animal Collections at the Audubon Butterfly Garden and Insectarium, for spider identification.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 30.445306929719315° to 30.469685487622733° latitude; -91.73468112945557° to -91.70335292816162° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Brittany R. Maldonado, Brad Glorioso, Raymond P. Kidder. 2020. Acris blanchardi (Blanchard's Cricket Frog), Predation. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70210535

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

No detection of Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans after non-native salamander putative pet release in Massachusetts, USA

The disease caused by the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) has caused mass mortality of salamanders across Europe (Stegen et al. 2017; amphibians are not known to be susceptible to the disease (Martel et al. 2014). Bsal puts North American amphibian biodiversity at risk (Martel et al. 2014; Gray et al. 2015) despite imports of potentially infected amphibians (USFWS 2016; WAPTR 2018; Grear et al. 2021). Recently, the U.S. has announced the finalization of the 2016 interim rule to the Lacey Act (USFWS 2016) to restrict imports of all species of salamanders from 20 genera to the list of injurious amphibians and has added 16 genera to the injurious amphibian list in a new interim rule in response to updated research on salamander susceptibility to Bsal infection (USFWS 2025). A large-scale survey across the USA failed to detect Bsal in over 10,000 individuals (Waddle et al. 2020), and ongoing efforts by North American colleges and universities are similarly conducting Bsal surveillance without more recent detection (e.g., Hyman and Hill 2024). Concerned amphibian and disease specialists nevertheless are preparing for a Bsal invasion into North America (Grant et al. 2017; Olson et al.2024). Despite the initial survey results, the risk of Bsal incursion into North America remains due to broad host susceptibility of North American amphibian species (Gray et al. 2023). The major driver of Bsal introduction risk in the U.S. is expected to be captive amphibian release (Cunningham et al. 2015; Grear et al. 2021). Bsal primarily affects salamanders but anuran species can also be vectors (e.g., Towe et al. 2021; Monzon et al. 2022; Gray et al. 2023; Olson et al. 2024), increasing the risk of a released amphibian carrying Bsal into the natural environment (Grear et al. 2021). An early survey of pet salamanders in the United States did not detect Bsal (Klocke et al. 2017), but even one animal released with Bsal could have a major effect on local amphibians. Early detection and rapid response can improve host outcomes (Bletz et al. 2024; Gray et al. 2018), but the lack of timely knowledge about unwanted release of non-native pets to natural systems causes inevitable delay. Herein, we describe our experience responding to a report of a released non-native amphibian species, common in the pet trade (Gerson 2012; Maximo et al. 2021). We suggest improvements to early detection and rapid response efforts for amphibians and amphibian disease

Massachusetts