Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70210126

Massive sulfide deposits on the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge: Results of investigations in the USGS study area, 1980-83

Randolph A. Koski·William R. Normark·Janet L. Morton
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

No abstract available.

Explore related subjects

Marine MiningArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Randolph A. Koski, William R. Normark, Janet L. Morton. 1985. Massive sulfide deposits on the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge: Results of investigations in the USGS study area, 1980-83. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70210126

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS1990

Insular and submarine ferromanganese mineralization of the Tonga-Lau region

Ferromanganese oxides in the Tonga-Lau region are divided into crusts and stratabound deposits. Crusts were collected from the Tonga and Lau Ridges and have Fe/Mn ratios greater than 1, and an average Co content of 0.25%. The crusts average less than 10 mm thick with a maximum of 50 mm, and growth rates of tens of millimeters per million years. The thickest crust is probably less than a million years old. Crusts formed by both hydrogenetic and hydrothermal precipitation, with the hydrothermal input averaging 76%. Stratabound deposits are divided into three types. The source rocks through which the circulating fluids passed controlled the dominant minor element compositions of the stratabound deposits from each area: Valu Fa Ridge, Mo; Tonga Ridge Ti; Tonumea, Sr and Eua, V. -from Authors

Marine Mining↗
USGS1987

Nature and distribution of potential heavy-mineral resources offshore of the Atlantic Coast of the United States.

The US is dependent on foreign imports of placer heavy minerals for a majority of its ilmenite and rutile, and virtually all of its monazite requirements. Although sand deposits in the SE US are important domestic sources of these heavy minerals (HM) and a number of other less well-known heavy-mineral species, global onshore reserves of placer minerals may fall short of demand in as few as 20 years. Insofar as they are important commodities for the future, offshore HM placers will become more important, but much research on them remains to be done. Results of recent offshore studies, based on surficial grab samples, indicate an average of about 2 weight percent HM in surficial Atlantic Continental Shelf (ACS) sediments, in strong contrast with previous estimates of an average of 0.16% HM. Although provocative, the information from these grab samples does not include the thickness of the HM deposits and thus their volume and tonnage cannot be estimated.-from Author

Marine Mining↗