Timescales of water-quality change in a karst aquifer, south-central Texas

MaryLynn Musgrove; John E. Solder; Stephen P. Opsahl; Jennifer T. Wilson

doi:10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100041

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70205670

Timescales of water-quality change in a karst aquifer, south-central Texas

MaryLynn Musgrove·John E. Solder·Stephen P. Opsahl·Jennifer T. Wilson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding the drivers and timescales over which groundwater quality changes informs groundwater management, use, and protection. To better understand timescales of water-quality change over short (daily to monthly) and long (seasonal to decadal) timescales, the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Enhanced Trends Network (ETN) program instrumented and sampled three wells in the Edwards aquifer in south-central Texas. The wells were instrumented to provide high-frequency continuous (subhourly) water-quality data (temperature, pH, specific conductance, and dissolved oxygen), which were augmented by the collection of discrete samples (about 6 per year) for a range of geochemical constituents (including selected isotopes and age tracers). ETN data (2013–2017) are considered with data from additional sites for the same time period, and also historical records (over more than 80 years) of climatic and hydrologic conditions. During the four-year study, hydrologic conditions transitioned from very dry to very wet. Sites in the updip/unconfined part of the aquifer showed notable changes in water level and geochemistry (1) in response to rainfall/recharge events, and (2) over the multiyear dry/wet cycle. Sites in the downdip/confined part of the aquifer showed changes in water level/spring discharge over similar timescales, although the response is more muted. Geochemistry at the downdip/confined sites, however, varied slowly and minimally, indicating that the geochemical response of the deeper aquifer is decoupled from recent hydrologic responses. Changes at the updip/unconfined sites reflect mixing with recent recharge, whereas the downdip/confined sites were dominated by mineral-solution reactions resulting from longer (decadal) residence times. Mean groundwater ages interpreted from measured age tracers and lumped parameter models range from 7 to >700 years (where mixed with premodern downdip water) but were mostly modern. The aquifer is characterized by updip-to-downdip trends in geochemistry with respect to water-rock interaction and groundwater age. Fourier spectral analysis of historical records indicate hydrologic variability has occurred at dominant periods of 30 and 15 years; in conjunction with age tracers, these results provide insight into timescales at which the aquifer’s public supply is vulnerable to changes in the water quality of recharge.

Explore related subjects

Journal of Hydrology X Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 25.840117° to 36.500439° latitude; -106.645296° to -93.516943° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

MaryLynn Musgrove, John E. Solder, Stephen P. Opsahl, Jennifer T. Wilson. 2019. Timescales of water-quality change in a karst aquifer, south-central Texas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2025

Practical application of time-lapse camera imagery to develop water-level data for three hydrologic monitoring sites in Wisconsin during water year 2020

Using camera imagery to measure water level (camera-stage) is a well-researched area of study. Previous camera-stage studies have shown promising results when implementing this technology with tight constraints on test conditions. However, there is a need for a more comprehensive evaluation of the extensibility of camera-stage to practical applications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test a camera-stage method under a wide variety of test conditions to better understand the successes and challenges of using this technology in real-world scenarios. In this study, this approach was tested during Water Year 2020 at three existing U.S. Geological Study (USGS) stream gaging stations in south central Wisconsin that had existing USGS water-level instrumentation. The specific reference objects tested were white pipes and a concrete wall. Since successful application of camera-stage relies on use of suitable images, all captured images in this study were visually inspected to determine suitability for application of camera-stage. Camera-stage measurements were then computed only on images deemed suitable and the results were compared with ground-truth stage values to determine the accuracy. For the purposes of this study, camera-stage values within ±0.10 ft of the actual stage were considered acceptable. One major challenge highlighted was the potential difficulty in obtaining suitable imagery, with the proportion of suitable images varying greatly between the four trials from 38 % to 92 %. The results from applying camera-stage to suitable images were encouraging though, with 79 % to 99 % of evaluated camera-stage values qualifying as acceptable among the four test trials.

Wisconsin↗

USGS2025

A generalized design flood estimation framework under stationary and non-stationary scenarios

With the ever-ongoing debate over the death of stationarity in flood time series, developing methods for flood frequency analysis that can address both stationarity and non-stationarity simultaneously has become increasingly important for design flood estimation. Existing non-stationary flood frequency analysis (NFFQ) methods are either limited to providing time-varying conditional flood quantile estimates or lack closed-form expression to estimate the design flood over the planning period. We propose a novel framework, MM-NFFQ, that introduces marginal moments (MM) estimation techniques to provide a closed-form expression to estimate design flood under non-stationarity. We demonstrate MM-NFFQ using the LP3 distribution for estimating conditional moments, but in principle, it can work for any 3-parameter distribution. We first show the proposed MM-NFFQ collapses to stationary flood frequency analysis analytically using synthetic data and then demonstrate the MM-NFFQ approach for two basins exhibiting non-stationarity in their flood time series. We further extend the analysis to selected 40 basins across CONUS and find that arid basins exhibit higher deviation from stationarity. Thus, the proposed MM-NFFQ framework can estimate traditional flood frequency curves for both, stationary and non-stationary flood processes, and can also be utilized to analyze the changes in conditional moments and marginal moments over different planning horizons.

Journal of Hydrology X↗

USGS2024

Use of Doppler velocity radars to monitor and predict debris and flood wave velocities and travel times in post-wildfire basins

The magnitude and timing of extreme events such as debris and floodflows (collectively referred to as floodflows) in post-wildfire basins are difficult to measure and are even more difficult to predict. To address this challenge, a sensor ensemble consisting of noncontact, ground-based (near-field), Doppler velocity (velocity) and pulsed (stage or gage height) radars, rain gages, and a redundant radio communication network was leveraged to monitor flood wave velocities, to validate travel times, and to compliment observations from NEXRAD weather radar. The sensor ensemble (DEbris and Floodflow Early warNing System, DEFENS) was deployed in Waldo Canyon, Pike National Forest, Colorado, USA, which was burned entirely (100 percent burned) by the Waldo Canyon fire during the summer of 2012 ( MTBS, 2020 ). Surface velocity, stage, and precipitation time series collected during the DEFENS deployment on 10 August 2015 were used to monitor and predict flood wave velocities and travel times as a function of stream discharge (discharge; streamflow). The 10 August 2015 event exhibited spatial and temporal variations in rainfall intensity and duration that resulted in a discharge equal to 5.01 cubic meters per second (m 3 /s). Discharge was estimated post-event using a slope-conveyance indirect discharge method and was verified using velocity radars and the probability concept algorithm. Mean flood wave velocities – represented by the kinematic celerity ( c k = 2.619 m e t e r s p e r s e c o n d , m / s ± 0.556 p e r c e n t "> 𝑐 𝑘 = 2.619 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑, m/s ± 0.556 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡) and dynamic celerity ( c d = 3.533 m / s ± 0.181 p e r c e n t a n d t h e i r u n c e r t a i n t i e s "> 𝑐 𝑑 = 3.533 m/s ± 0.181 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡) and their uncertainties were computed. L-moments were computed to establish probability density functions (PDFs) and associated statistics for each of the at-a-section hydraulic parameters to serve as a workflow for implementing alert networks in hydrologically similar basins that lack data. Measured flood wave velocities and travel times agreed well with predicted values. Absolute percent differences between predicted and measured flood wave velocities ranged from 1.6 percent to 49 percent and varied with water slope, hydraulic radius, and depth. The kinematic celerity was a better predictor for steep slopes and wide flood plains associated with the Upper Waldo and Middle Waldo radar streamgages; whereas, the dynamic celerity was a better surrogate for shallow slopes and incised channels such as the Lower Waldo radar streamgage. The method demonstrates the potential extensibility of a post-wildfire warning system by (1) leveraging multiple systems (i.e., weather radar, near-field velocity and stage radars, and rain gages) for accurate and timely warnings of debris and floodflows, (2) establishing an order of operations to site, install, and operate near-field radars and conventional rain gages to record floodflows, forecast travel times, and document geomorphic change in this basin and hydrologically similar basins that lack data, and (3) communicating data operationally with the Colorado Department of Transportation engineering staff, National Weather Service forecasters, and emergency managers.

Colorado↗