Lithologies, ages, and provenance of clasts in the Ordovician Fincastle Conglomerate, Botetourt County, Virginia, USA

Harvey E. Belkin; John E. Repetski; Frank T. Dulong; Nelson L. Hickling

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70203799

Lithologies, ages, and provenance of clasts in the Ordovician Fincastle Conglomerate, Botetourt County, Virginia, USA

Harvey E. Belkin·John E. Repetski·Frank T. Dulong·Nelson L. Hickling

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Fincastle Conglomerate is an Ordovician polymictic, poorly sorted, matrix- and clast-supported cobble to boulder-rich conglomerate located just north of Fincastle, Botetourt County, VA. At least nine other cobble and boulder conglomerates are located in a similar stratigraphic position from Virginia to Georgia west of the Blue Ridge structural front. All except the Fincastle are dominated (~80%) by carbonate clasts; Fincastle clasts are much more varied and siliceous and it is this clast diversity that provides increased value for provenance and related studies. We have used a multidisciplinary approach that involves conodont analysis, sandstone petrography, in-situ outcrop clast characterization, optical petrography, electron-beam petrography and chemical analysis, and X-ray diffraction to provide data on lithologies, ages, and provenance. The size, roundness, and lithology of 1,656 clasts (> 1 cm) were measured in the field. Although, the clast lithology varies among the studied localities, the average lithology is sandstone and siltstone 12 %, vein quartz 17 %, limestone 31 %, low-grade quartzite/metasandstone 31 %, chert 6 %, and others 3 %. Dolomite, igneous, or high-grademetamorphic rock clastswere not identified in field study or in detailed laboratory analysis.Dolomite rhombs and authigenic albite feldsparwere observed in some limestone clasts. Quantitative petrographic data for the Fincastle sandstone clasts indicate tectonic environments from passive margin to transitional continental uplift, but the conglomeratematrixmodes have considerably less feldspar and plot in the foreland basin tectonic environment region. Proto-, para-, and euconodonts were identified from clast and matrix, but are long-ranging fauna indicating middle Cambrian toMiddle or Late Ordovician ages; color alteration index (CAI) for euconodonts varied from 3 to 3.5. The occurrence of well-rounded clasts including limestone suggests a nearby, high-energy environment, and that transport was rapid enough to preserve limestone before deposition into a foreland basin. The lack of igneous or high-grade metamorphic rocks clasts suggests that the erosional level sampled by the Fincastle Conglomerate did not include the underlying Grenville basement of igneous or high-grade metamorphic rocks.

Explore related subjects

Stratigraphy Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 37.50284892169062° to 37.5299444060497° latitude; -79.88811492919922° to -79.85455513000488° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Harvey E. Belkin, John E. Repetski, Frank T. Dulong, Nelson L. Hickling. 2019. Lithologies, ages, and provenance of clasts in the Ordovician Fincastle Conglomerate, Botetourt County, Virginia, USA. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70203799

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Paleocene-Eocene dinoflagellate biostratigraphy in the central Delaware coastal plain

Dinoflagellate cyst palynology and lithostratigraphy from three continuously cored boreholes (Blackbird, Smyrna, and Woodland Beach), supplemented by calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphic data, were used to refine the age and correlation of three Paleocene-Eocene formations in northern Delaware: the Vincentown, Manasquan, and Shark River. Lithologic logs reveal significant facies changes in the upper Paleocene Vincentown Formation over a short distance (*9 km) southeastward, transitioning from very permeable glauconite-quartz-shell-rich sands that form the regionally important Rancocas/Aquia aquifer to much less permeable muddy sands and sandy muds. These lithologic changes represent a shift from nearshore, clear, warm-water, carbonate-rich sand shoals to mud-dominated deeper-water, offshore shelfal environments. Dinocyst assemblages including Areoligera gippingensis, Cribroperidinium giuseppei, and Stenodinium meckelfeldensis confirm the Paleogene ages and track these paleoceanographic changes from shallow coastal settings updip to neritic or outer marine settings downdip. The Vincentown Formation is unconformably overlain by the lower Eocene Manasquan Formation, which consists predominantly of silt and clay with relatively consistent lithology across the study area, representing general neritic or open marine conditions. Lithology, dinoflagellate cyst assemblages, and calcareous nannofossil data indicate that the Marlboro Clay and its record of the onset of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) global warming event is absent from the Paleocene-Eocene transition at these sites, with an unconformity marking the boundary between the Vincentown and Manasquan formations. The youngest unit examined, the Eocene Shark River Formation, unconformably overlies the Manasquan Formation and consists of interbedded clayey silts and sands, with dinoflagellate assemblages suggesting a return to coastal or inner neritic settings. Calcareous nannofossil zones recognized from the Woodland Beach core corroborate the depositional ages determined using dinoflagellates throughout the sequence, confirming the chronostratigraphic framework for these important coastal plain units.

Delaware↗

USGS2026

Abandonment of the Upper Devonian Greenland Gap Group and Scherr Formation and revision of the Upper Devonian Brallier and Foreknobs Formations in the central Valley and Ridge Province

This study revises the lithostratigraphic framework of the Upper Devonian interval traditionally assigned to the Greenland Gap Group across the central Appalachian Valley and Ridge Province. The work aims to modernize and standardize lithostratigraphic nomenclature, establish a new reference section and demonstrate how the revised stratigraphy improves edge-matching of 1:24,000 scale geologic maps and supports compilation mapping at scales of 1:100,000 and larger. The revision eliminates the names Greenland Gap Group, Scherr Formation and the Minnehaha Springs Member of the Scherr Formation; reassigns all strata previously designated as Scherr Formation by Dennison (1970) to the upper Brallier Formation; and abandons the basal Mallow Member of the Foreknobs Formation, placing its strata within the upper Brallier as originally defined by Butts (1918). The contact between the Brallier and Foreknobs formations is placed at the base of the first mappable, ridge-forming package of fine- to coarse-grained, cross-bedded, sandstone beds, often containing rounded quartz pebbles with minor interbeds of shale and siltstone. This contact may be gradational in places but, even in absence of good exposure, can usually be distinguished topographically in recently produced lidar-derived imagery as having elevated relief due to the presence of more resistant, compositionally mature coarse-grained sandstone-rich strata. Applying this criterion for mapping the contact between the Brallier and Foreknobs formations has resulted in reconciliation of mismatches of geologic contacts along several 7.5-minute quadrangle boundaries in the states of Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. A new reference section at Baker, West Virginia showcases the contacts between the Harrell Shale, Brallier Formation, Foreknobs Formation and Hampshire Formation. A digital outcrop model of the reference section is provided for future preservation.

Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia↗

USGS2026

Report 17—Revisions to the articles of organization and procedure of the Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Americas

Several revisions to the Articles of Organization and Procedure for the North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature have been adopted following the 75th, 79th, and 80th annual meetings of the Commission in 2020, 2024 and 2025, respectively. Of these, the most substantial change was revision of Article III regarding membership composition of the Commission and the addition of new member organizations from Central and South America and the Caribbean region. As a result, the Commission also voted to change its name to be more inclusive of the expanding membership, with approval of the name: Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Americas. A corresponding change to the Commission’s fundamental publication was also approved at the 2025 meeting as the Stratigraphic Code of the Americas (formerly the North American Stratigraphic Code). Additional revisions to the Articles include those aimed at ensuring gender neutrality of titles, permission to hold virtual meetings, and processes for designating new Commissioners. Article V was also modified to define quorum for meetings and the nature of a two-thirds majority vote, with the process for making amendments to the Articles modified to specify that a two-thirds majority vote is required. These revisions are reflected in the following bylaws, which otherwise are as adopted by the Commission under its former name (North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature) at its 62nd annual meeting in 2007 amended by mail ballot, and published by Owen et al. (2009). The amended bylaws printed below became effective at the close of the 80th annual meeting in 2025 and supersede all previous versions (Moore 1947; Hutchinson 1953; Owen et al. 1985; 2009)

Stratigraphy↗