Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70202880

Sources, timing, and fate of sediment and contaminants in the nearshore: insights from geochemistry

Abstract

Rivers in Cascade watersheds carry sediment with a volcanic composition that is distinct from the plutonic composition of the Puget lowlands. Compositional properties (signatures) allow discrimination of river-sourced Cascade from lowland sediment, and inferences about transport pathways. Surface sediment on land contains atmospheric radionuclides whose known decay rates define monthly (7Be) and decadal (210Pb) timescales of sediment inputs from land to nearshore regions. We used geochemical signatures to source river-borne sediment in two urban embayments in Cascade watersheds: Commencement Bay (CB) and Bellingham Bay (BB). We concurrently determined sediment contaminant levels and, in CB, used geochemical aging to distinguish contaminants in recent winter outflow from those that were pre-existing. Methods are described in Takesue et al. (2017). Geochemical signatures showed that Puyallup River (PU)-sourced fine sediment (<63 µm) accumulated more along the northeast (NE) shore of CB than the southwest: median 91% and 69%, respectively. River-sourced sediment from recent winter storms, containing higher 7Be activities (open circles, Fig. 1A), also accumulated on the NE shore and had lower contents of PAHs, fecal sterols, PCBs, and potentially toxic metals (TM) compared to the south shore; only PBDEs were higher (column graphs, Fig. 1A). Lower 7Be and 210Pb activities in south shore sediment indicated that contaminants there were associated with older sediment. Existing sediment in CB contained higher levels of urban contaminants than new PU material. No PAH, PCB, or TM levels in CB exceeded Washington State marine sediment quality standards (WAMSQS). Geochemical signatures were not distinct in the Nooksack River watershed and lowlands, precluding sediment sourcing in BB. PAH ratios in BB sediments were ubiquitous (open circles, Fig. 1B), suggesting atmospheric rather than riverine transport, and had values indicating biomass/coal combustion sources, except for three sites along the urban waterfront that had values indicative of vehicle emissions (closed circles, Fig. 1B). Elevated TM occurred offshore of Fairhaven (cadmium, Cd; copper, Cu; lead, Pb; zinc, Zn), Whatcom Creek Waterway (Pb, Zn), and the marina (Cu, Zn). No PAH or TM concentrations in BB exceeded WAMSQS. Insights gained from sediment geochemistry about the sources, timing, transport, and fate of riverborne fine sediment and contaminants in nearshore regions are valuable components of monitoring programs that can help guide habitat restoration and resource management decisions toward effective and sustainable outcomes.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 47.06579564376744° to 47.09694798930915° latitude; -122.71393775939941° to -122.67788887023924° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Renee K. Takesue, Kathleen E. Conn, Margaret Dutch. 2019. Sources, timing, and fate of sediment and contaminants in the nearshore: insights from geochemistry. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70202880

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Time-to-depth conversion of seismic-reflection data from eastern Lake Superior and implications for the eastern arm of the Midcontinent Rift

Seismic-reflection data were acquired in the mid 1980s along several lines across eastern Lake Superior by industry and the Great Lakes International Multidisciplinary Program on Crustal Evolution (GLIMPCE) (Fig. 1). The lines form part of a larger network of crossing lines over the entire lake, which can be used to develop three-dimensional geologic models of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift that lies below. To better interpret these lines, we developed velocity models to convert seismic reflections versus two-way travel time (TWTT) to reflections versus depth. In addition, the velocity models themselves provide insights into the structure of the Midcontinent Rift by recognizing common velocity ranges for certain rock types (Grauch, 2023).

eastern Lake Superior

Revisiting the utility of regional-scale, high-quality geophysical data in mineral exploration - A case study featuring the Mammoth Magnetic Anomaly, Pinal County, Arizona

Regional aeromagnetic surveys passively measure the total magnetic intensity (TMI) and are a foundational tool used in mineral exploration (Airo, 2015). With the increased global demand and the number of critical mineral resources required for manufacturing high-tech devices, developing high-quality, regional-scale geophysical surveys could aid critical mineral exploration efforts and geologic mapping. In 2019, the U. S. Geological Survey launched the Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) to modernize the geologic and geophysical mapping of regions that have the potential to contain critical mineral resources within the United States. In support of planning Earth MRI geophysical surveys, Drenth and Grauch (2019) defined five aeromagnetic data quality rankings (rank 1 through rank 5) applying them to the airborne geophysical survey inventory of the United States (Johnson et al., 2021). Rank 1 aeromagnetic surveys are of the highest quality, meeting modern standards and allowing best practices for qualitative and quantitative interpretation; whereas rank 5 aeromagnetic surveys are of the lowest quality, being useful only for qualitative interpretation of broad features. Through the Earth MRI effort, 48 high-quality, regional-scale rank 1 and 2 airborne magnetic and radiometric geophysical surveys have been planned, collected, or publicly release through May 2025 (U. S. Geological Survey, 2025). Here, a portion of a rank 1 Earth MRI aeromagnetic survey in southeast Arizona is presented and compared to a legacy rank 5 aeromagnetic survey over the Mammoth Magnetic Anomaly (MMA), demonstrating how modern, high-quality aeromagnetic data improves our view of crustal geology, aiding mineral exploration.

Arizona

Early Miocene volcanic rocks and associated tectonics, Lava Hills and southern Bristol Mountains, California

Volcanic rocks of latest Oligocene to early Miocene age form an east-west belt across part of the central eastern Mojave Desert from the Whipple Mountains on the east to the Rosamond Hills on the west. We term this the central belt because it is separated from northern and southern belts by swaths with no volcanic rocks. Limited geochronologic data indicate that much of the belt is latest Oligocene and early Miocene in age, about 24 to 19 Ma, a finding that is consistent with these rocks being overlain by the 18.8 Ma Peach Spring Tuff in many places. We describe Miocene geology in a central area of the belt, in the Lava Hills, southern Bristol Mountains, and southern Old Dad Mountains. Sedimentary basins formed coeval with early andesite to rhyolite volcanism, progressing from fluvial and lacustrine tuffaceous sandstone to volcanic lavas, tuffs, and breccias, indicating that early basins formed proximal to volcanic edifices. Higher strata are fluvial and lacustrine with lavas punctuating the sequence. Although basins may partly have been formed within topographic lows bounded by volcanic domes, plateaus, and stratovolcanoes, consistent stratigraphic sections over wide areas indicate that tectonic basin evolution affected broad areas. The volcanic section is capped by local basalt flows and the regional Peach Spring Tuff. Limited data on normal faults support interpretations of early extensional basin development caused by northeast-southwest oriented stretching. Later extension caused stratal rotations, tilting early deposits down to the southwest. This tilted and subsequently beveled basin architecture was overlain by the youngest volcanic deposits, primarily rhyolite and basalt. The Peach Spring Tuff, 18.8 Ma, lies within this upper unit. Similar stratigraphic and structural relations are exposed in the nearby Marble Mountains and Van Winkle Mountain sections, reinforcing that a broad area underwent similar volcanism and tectonism. In our study area the upper unit is only very gently tilted except near dextral strike-slip faults of the eastern California shear zone. These late Miocene to Recent faults are represented as four main fault zones spaced about 5 km apart, representing distributed shear north of the Bristol Lake basin.

California