Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70198934

Amendments fail to hasten biocrust recovery or soil stability at a disturbed dryland sandy site

David G. Chandler·Natalie K. Day·Matthew D. Madsen·Jayne Belnap
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In most drylands, biological soil crusts (biocrusts), an assemblage of lichens, bryophytes, fungi, green algae, and cyanobacteria, are critical to healthy ecosystem function. However, they are extremely sensitive to disturbance and attempts to facilitate their recovery have had variable success. In this study, we applied soil amendments designed to improve soil surface stability and accelerate biocrust recovery on an area disturbed by oil/gas exploration vehicles. Treatments included: 1) Control (one time water only); 2) Biocrust‐only: biocrust inoculum + nutrients in water; 3) Polyacrylamide gels (PAM; which are known to stabilize soils) + biocrust inoculum + nutrients in water; 4) Gypsum + biocrust inoculum + nutrients in water; and 5) Saline (NaCl) solution + biocrust inoculum + nutrients in water. Only the NaCl treatment showed any effects on soil properties and these were only short‐term. These effects included an increase in soil strength and a reduction in soil aggregate stability, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K h ), and cyanobacterial biomass. The inoculated biocrust material failed to develop and even after 10 years, there was only a very low natural recolonization of the plots. These results show that inoculating soils or applying these levels of soil amendments does not guarantee recovery of soil stability or biocrust, and that some sites are unlikely to recover without assistance. Thus, there is a need for more research into ways to enhance soil stability and identify the factors limiting biocrust establishment.

Explore related subjects

Restoration EcologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David G. Chandler, Natalie K. Day, Matthew D. Madsen, Jayne Belnap. 2018-09-03. Amendments fail to hasten biocrust recovery or soil stability at a disturbed dryland sandy site. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Biocrust restoration in novel climates: Assisted migration, habitat amelioration, and varied community composition as climate-smart techniques

Introduction Successful restoration of terrestrial drylands depends on stable, fertile soils that retain water. These functions are provided by biological soil crusts (biocrust), suggesting their reestablishment is a critical step in dryland restoration. Restoration may be hindered by the increasingly documented negative effects of climate change, while new climate-smart biocrust restoration methods may improve short- and long-term restoration outcomes. Objectives In this study, we evaluated three approaches to climate-smart biocrust restoration: assisted migration, habitat amelioration via shading, and varied community composition. Methods We collected biocrusts from across wide geographic gradients spanning multiple climate regimes, including wide ranges of mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, and precipitation seasonality. We used biocrust from these different environments as inoculum in two common garden restoration trials, in a research greenhouse testing shading and drying, and at a rangeland field site evaluating shading and warming. Results Community composition was related to climate across the natal (inoculum source) sites, and differences in the initial proportion of moss, lichen, and cyanobacteria resulted in different responses to experimental restoration treatments. We found mixed support for the efficacy of assisted migration and likely not enough success to outweigh the potential risks at present. Shading facilitated moss establishment even under warmer and drier conditions but inhibited lichen establishment and had little effect on cyanobacteria, which colonized quickly between mosses and lichens. Conclusion Overall, our results suggest several potential paths forward for biocrust restoration in warming drylands.

western United States↗
USGS2026

Assessing working lands as habitat for disturbance-dependent birds using autonomous recording units

Introduction Working lands can provide habitat for declining disturbance-dependent birds, such as Bachman's Sparrow ( Peucaea aestivalis ) and Northern Bobwhite ( Colinus virginianus ), but it remains unclear whether restoration following intensive land use (e.g. surface mining) yields habitat comparable to less intensive land uses (e.g. timber production). Objectives We evaluated effects of land use both in working lands (recently replanted surface mine reclamation site and recently replanted timber production site) and reference sites explicitly managed for wildlife (recently restored young pine savanna and mature pine savanna) and understory vegetation characteristics on relative abundance of disturbance-dependent birds within upland pine ( Pinus spp.) communities in southeastern Georgia, United States. We hypothesized that the mine reclamation site would support similar bird species but in lower relative abundances than other land uses. Methods We conducted daily acoustic surveys using autonomous recording units (ARUs) and measured vegetation surveys once per point from May to June 2024. We used Royle-Nichols models, an adapted occupancy model, to estimate relative abundance for eight bird species. Results Land use influenced relative abundance for all species and explained more variation in relative abundance than measured understory vegetation characteristics. The mining reclamation site supported most disturbance-dependent species and, in some cases, equal or higher relative abundances, particularly for Northern Bobwhite and Common Nighthawk ( Chordeiles minor ). Responses across timber production and savanna sites varied by species. Vegetation effects were generally weaker and species-specific, suggesting that land use history and associated habitat legacies play an important role in structuring these bird communities. Conclusion Working lands, including reclaimed mines, can provide habitat for disturbance-dependent birds, and ARUs are effective for evaluating these patterns across land uses.

Restoration Ecology↗
USGS2026

Mesophotic octocoral larval settlement preferences and behaviors

Introduction Lab-based coral reproduction is advancing restoration efforts to support coral populations injured by the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Objectives This study aimed to answer foundational questions concerning coral spawning and larval settlement that need to be resolved for these mesophotic and deep-sea coral species before restoration efforts can be scaled up. Methods From 2021 to 2023, fragments of the mesophotic octocorals Swiftia exserta and Thesea nivea were collected from the continental shelf offshore from Texas to Florida and transported to a federal facility in Florida. Multiyear spawning allowed for in-depth analysis of spawning periodicity, egg development, larval behavior, settlement rate, and substrate preference. In addition, we determined the likelihood of successful development and survival during early stages of development. Results Fertilization rates remained high throughout spawning periods of both species, with S. exserta spawning during a 1-month period and T. nivea continuing to spawn year-round. Larvae from both corals significantly preferred tiles seeded with crustose coralline algae, and there were species-specific preferences in substrate material. Additionally, larval survival or mortality was typically evident within a few days when in the presence of settlement substrates. In the absence of substrates, we observed larvae surviving for up to 2 months without settling. Conclusions This work answers critical questions to inform the long-term logistical planning for eventual out-planting of these species. Further, it highlights avenues that could accelerate future restoration-based reproduction efforts into unexplored mesophotic and deep species.

Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas↗