How hunter perceptions of wildlife regulations, agency trust, and satisfaction affect attitudes about duck bag limits

Susan A. Schroeder; David C. Fulton; Jeffrey S. Lawrence; Steven D. Cordts

doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1345021

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70193573

How hunter perceptions of wildlife regulations, agency trust, and satisfaction affect attitudes about duck bag limits

Susan A. Schroeder·David C. Fulton·Jeffrey S. Lawrence·Steven D. Cordts

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study explored how factors, including the function of bag limits, agency trust, satisfaction, hunting participation, and demographics, related to opinions about duck bag limits. The results are from a survey of 2014 Minnesota resident waterfowl hunters. Analyses identified four dimensions of attitudes about functions of bag limits, including that they: (a) are descriptive in defining the acceptable number of ducks that can be bagged, (b) are injunctive in establishing how many ducks should be allowed to be bagged, (c) ensure fair opportunities for all hunters to bag ducks, and (d) reflect biological limitations to protect waterfowl populations. Descriptive and fairness functions of bag limits were related to opinions about bag limits, as were factors related to agency trust, satisfaction, ducks bagged, experience with more restrictive bag limits, hunter age, and hunting group membership. Agencies may increase support by building trust and emphasizing the descriptive and fairness functions of regulations.

Explore related subjects

Human Dimensions of Wildlife Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Susan A. Schroeder, David C. Fulton, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Steven D. Cordts. 2017. How hunter perceptions of wildlife regulations, agency trust, and satisfaction affect attitudes about duck bag limits. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1345021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Perceptions of relational organizing as a tool for human–bear coexistence

Conflict between humans and American black bears ( Ursus americanus ) is a growing concern in North America, especially in wildland–urban interfaces. Beyond ecological drivers, conflict reduction relies on changing human behavior. Neighbor-to-neighbor conversations, also known as relational organizing, may drive social diffusion of coexistence actions. However, little research has explored the behavioral conditions enabling (a) residents to initiate conversations and (b) neighbors to listen and adopt bear-safe practices. Using the capability, opportunity, motivations and behavior (COM-B) framework, we analyzed 34 semi-structured interviews with engaged residents in two western U.S. communities with ongoing coexistence efforts. Results highlight that interviewees have heterogeneous knowledge and skills (capability), are committed to leveraging interpersonal relationships but concerned about protecting these relationships (social opportunity), feel more able to engage in relational organizing with enabling programmatic support and regulatory frameworks (physical opportunity), and are motivated by identity, emotion, and beliefs about consequences.

Colorado, Montana↗

USGS2026

Political identity predicts hunting occurrence on private land

Understanding the factors that predict whether hunting occurs on private land is vital for effective wildlife management. In this exploratory study, we surveyed non-industrial landowners ( n = 855) along an urban-to-rural gradient in Durham County, North Carolina, to examine how political identity and several socio-demographic and geographic variables predict hunting occurrence on private property. Standardized comparisons (|ln(SOR)|) indicated that road density was the strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.994), with hunting less likely in higher road-density areas. Age was the second strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.469), with hunting more likely on properties owned by older landowners. Political identity was the third strongest predictor (|ln(SOR)| = 0.393), with hunting less likely on properties owned by landowners with more liberal political identities. These results illustrate that structural landscape features and socio-political factors shape hunting occurrence, and that customizing stakeholder engagement to align with landowner political identity may improve hunting access on private land.

North Carolina↗

USGS2026

Engaging adult R3 outdoor educational program design to strengthen participation in hunting and fishing

Declining participation in hunting and fishing has been slowed by women who are learning numerous outdoor skills through recruitment, retention, and reactivation [R3] programs. R3 programs are hosted by state agencies, non-governmental organizations, and businesses that take a variety of approaches to develop participant skills and confidence. To understand how R3 program design influences hunting and fishing participation, we conducted 11 focus group interviews with 72 participants at women’s R3 programs to identify program design components that women appreciate when learning to hunt and fish. Well-designed programs offered customized educational approaches to align with participants’ needs, created a supportive environment to foster a sense of belonging, and streamlined participation through event logistics. Programs that incorporated these design components promoted skill development, boosted self-confidence, and helped participants build a supportive network to independently hunt and fish. Program leaders can apply these findings to bolster participation in hunting and fishing.

Human Dimensions of Wildlife↗