Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70192707

Parental care mitigates carry-over effects of poor early conditions on offspring growth

Sonya K. Auer·Thomas E. Martin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Poor developmental conditions can have long-lasting negative effects on offspring phenotypes, but impacts often differ among species. Contrasting responses may reflect disparities in experimental protocols among single-species studies or inherent differences among species in their sensitivity to early conditions and/or ability to mitigate negative impacts. We used a common experimental protocol to assess and compare the role of parental care in mitigating effects of poor early conditions on offspring among 4 sympatric bird species in the wild. We experimentally induced low incubation temperatures and examined effects on embryonic developmental rates, hatching success, nestling growth rates, and parental responses. We examined the generality of these effects across 4 species that differ in their phylogenetic history, breeding ecology, and life histories. We found that cooling led to delayed hatching in all species, but carry-over effects on offspring differed among species. Parents of some but not all species increased their offspring provisioning rates in response to experimental cooling with critical benefits for offspring growth rates. Our study shows for the first time that species exhibit clear differences in the degree to which they are affected by poor early conditions. Observed differences among species demonstrate that parental care is a critical mechanism for mitigating potential negative effects on offspring and suggest that parental responses may be constrained to varying degrees by ecology and life histories.

Explore related subjects

Behavioral EcologyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sonya K. Auer, Thomas E. Martin. 2017-06-06. Parental care mitigates carry-over effects of poor early conditions on offspring growth. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco%2Farx082

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Growth, movement, and survival of precocial shorebird chicks are constrained by their environment.

Young animals are often less mobile than adults, while also having high energetic demands. They may therefore be more vulnerable to local-scale changes in environmental conditions. In particular, when 1 sex must grow more rapidly than the other to achieve a larger adult size, that sex may experience especially dramatic reductions in growth and survival in the face of suboptimal environmental conditions. In order to investigate the flexibility of individuals in response to local-scale environmental variation during development, we studied the sex-specific growth, movement, and survival of Hudsonian Godwit ( Limosa haemastica ) chicks—a sexually dimorphic, precocial shorebird that breeds in the sub-Arctic and exhibits a male-skewed adult sex ratio. We found that female chicks—which must grow to a larger adult size—reached their maximum growth rates at a later age, but had similar growth rates to males before that and survived equally well to 21 days. We also found that, irrespective of sex, chicks had reduced movement rates when they were young and/or temperatures were cold, and only weakly increased their movement rates when invertebrate abundances remained low across an entire week. Early in life, godwit chicks may therefore be constrained from increasing their foraging efforts by local environmental conditions, forcing females to sustain higher growth rates late in the season past the local resource peak. Such sex-specific vulnerabilities could lead to lower early-life survival and, in turn, skewed adult sex ratios, which have important implications for population dynamics and persistence.

Behavioral Ecology↗
USGS2026

Drivers of disperser immigration into cooperatively breeding carnivore groups

Dispersal is a fundamental process that shapes social groups by affecting genetic diversity, group composition, and social dynamics through immigration and subsequent settlement. In group-living animals, dispersal involves more than just leaving 1 group and arriving at another because dispersers also need to be accepted at an established group for successful dispersal to occur. Understanding how and why new individuals integrate into established social groups remains a key question, particularly when the benefits to existing members are unclear. This question persists in part because the ecological and social conditions that shape disperser settlement remain poorly understood. We leveraged an existing harvest regime and examined 18 years of life-history data from a wild population of cooperatively breeding gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) to understand immigration dynamics of group-living. Specifically, we tested how social and environmental conditions within groups predicted the likelihood that a disperser successfully immigrated into a group, analyzing how breeder turnover, annual harvest, group size, and genetic relatedness influenced that decision. Turnover of breeding males had the strongest effect on the probability of disperser settlement, suggesting that the loss of key social roles may create opportunities for new individuals to join groups. We also found an interaction between group size and harvest. By quantifying conditions that shape immigrant settlement, we highlight a mechanism influencing the stability and structure of cooperatively breeding groups. Unlike studies focused on individual dispersal decisions, our research highlights how variation in ecological and social conditions shape settlement into groups by dispersers.

Idaho↗
USGS2025

Causes of differential migration distance: Test of seven mechanistic hypotheses in an arctic raptor

Exploring the causes of differential migration, or variation in migration distance, has increased our understanding of the remarkable variation in migratory behavior exhibited by birds more generally. However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding the mechanisms underlying differential migration distance in birds despite it being a common phenomenon. We leveraged migration distances from GPS-tracked rough-legged hawks Buteo lagopus to test predictions deduced from seven hypotheses proposed to explain the underlying cause(s) of differential migration distance. We provide the first empirical evidence in support of a social dominance food maximization hypothesis whereby dominant individuals migrate to higher quality nonbreeding locations with respect to foraging efficiency regardless of migration distance. Within females, larger more dominant individuals migrated intermediate distances while smaller, subordinate individuals migrated both longer and shorter distances. We also found support for the social dominance distance minimization hypothesis because more aggressive females migrated shorter distances, although increased aggression at shorter distances may be a consequence of poor body condition. Within males, we found some support for the fasting endurance and thermal tolerance hypotheses because body size was negatively correlated with migration distance. Body size was also negatively correlated with food availability and winter minimum temperatures within both sexes, providing additional mechanistic support for the fasting endurance and thermal tolerance hypotheses. Overall, our results suggest differential migration distance within rough-legged hawks is caused by a combination of competition for nonbreeding resources and constraints on fasting endurance or thermal tolerance, but is unrelated to competition for breeding opportunities, dietary preferences, or flight efficiency.

Behavioral Ecology↗