USGS · 70187481
An application and extension of the constraints–effects–mitigation model to Minnesota waterfowl hunting
Abstract
This study extends modeling work on the leisure constraint negotiation process from physically active leisure and celebrity fandom to hunting. We test a model derived from the constraints–effects–mitigation model of leisure participation. The model is examined in the context of continued Minnesota waterfowl hunting among a sample of Minnesota residents who purchased a North Dakota waterfowl stamp. Results are from a mail survey conducted in 2006. In our modeling, successful constraint negotiation fully mediated the constraints–participation relationship, while involvement had both direct and indirect effects on participation. Hunter motivation was positively related to involvement. Results advance understanding of the relationships among factors that influence leisure participation, and suggest that constraint negotiation may differ among recreation activities with different participant profiles.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Susan A. Schroeder, David C. Fulton, Jeffrey S. Lawrence, Steven D. Cordts. 2012. An application and extension of the constraints–effects–mitigation model to Minnesota waterfowl hunting. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2012.650317
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.