Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70180939

Vulnerability of port and harbor communities to earthquake and tsunami hazards: The use of GIS in community hazard planning

Nathan J. Wood·James W. Good
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Abstract Earthquakes and tsunamis pose significant threats to Pacific Northwest coastal port and harbor communities. Developing holistic mitigation and preparedness strategies to reduce the potential for loss of life and property damage requires community-wide vulnerability assessments that transcend traditional site-specific analyses. The ability of a geographic information system (GIS) to integrate natural, socioeconomic, and hazards information makes it an ideal assessment tool to support community hazard planning efforts. This article summarizes how GIS was used to assess the vulnerability of an Oregon port and harbor community to earthquake and tsunami hazards, as part of a larger risk-reduction planning initiative. The primary purposes of the GIS were to highlight community vulnerability issues and to identify areas that both are susceptible to hazards and contain valued port and harbor community resources. Results of the GIS analyses can help decision makers with limited mitigation resources set priorities for increasing community resiliency to natural hazards.

Explore related subjects

Coastal ManagementArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nathan J. Wood, James W. Good. 2004. Vulnerability of port and harbor communities to earthquake and tsunami hazards: The use of GIS in community hazard planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750490448622

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Cultural benefits knowledge and social learning in Elwha River dam removal and ecosystem decision-making

In a retrospective case study of the seminal Elwha River dam removal in Washington State, USA, we explore pathways through which ecosystem services (ES) knowledge can inform environmental decision-making. We specifically investigate how knowledge of cultural benefits linked to the Elwha River ecosystem was made available. Through interviews and historical document review we identify diverse forms of cultural benefits knowledge (i.e., how individuals or groups know the contributions of an ecosystem to their identities, experiences, and capabilities), including both knowledge in the form of practices – embodied or enacted forms of knowledge, and knowledge in the form of products – quantitative or written documentation. Recognizing and learning from the diverse forms in which benefits knowledges are conveyed can support more accurate and equitable consideration of the diverse values, well-beings, and human-nature relationships linked to ecosystems. With this case study, we illuminate pathways for meaningful consideration of multiple knowledge forms, and the plural ecosystem values they convey, with relevance for environmental decision processes in the Puget Sound and beyond.

Washington↗
USGS2026

From uncertainty to co-production: Structural and systemic barriers to salmon recovery in Puget Sound

This case study examines barriers to implementing “H-Integrated” salmon recovery strategies—efforts that coordinate habitat, hatchery, harvest, and hydropower actions—in Puget Sound. Based on a focus group with Tribal, State, Federal, and nonprofit practitioners, we identified five interconnected constraints: data gaps , modeling frameworks , decision-making under uncertainty , limited organizational capacity , and collaboration across silos . These were embedded within a sixth cross-cutting constraint: structural and systemic barriers , exemplified by complicated institutional dynamics and differences in how expertise is recognized across organizations. Participants emphasized that these challenges are closely connected, making it harder for groups to plan together, adapt to change, or try new approaches. Many of these challenges reflect not only technical limitations, but also stem from contrasting perspectives on data collection and decision authority, as well as the complex histories that have shaped relationships among agencies, organizations, and Tribal Nations. We interpret these dynamics through the lenses of situated knowledge and epistemological pluralism and suggest that effective knowledge co-production can bridge these gaps and strengthen collaborative problem-solving, innovation, and risk-taking. Participants emphasized that, along with modeling tools that reflect the realities of on-the-ground decision-making, H-Integration depends on institutional support for collaborative monitoring and trust-building. In practice, this means developing processes that integrate different perspectives and treating co-production as an ongoing institutional commitment.

Washington↗
USGS2019

Coastal armoring and sea turtles: Beachfront homeowners’ opinions and intent

Florida’s dynamic beach-dune ecosystem and the structures built along the shore face threats from coastal (or shoreline) erosion, sea level rise, and inadequate regulatory protection efforts. In light of these threats, private property owners are choosing to install coastal armoring on their property to protect upland structures which can negatively impact sea turtles and their nesting habitat. Coastal armoring can significantly degrade the beach-dune ecosystem which serves as a vital economic and recreational resource and as crucial habitat for threatened or endangered sea turtle species, nesting shorebirds, and other endemic species. This study explored both Florida coastal property owner’s opinions of coastal armoring, and its impact on sea turtles and their nesting habitat. A quantitative survey was administered to beachfront single-family property owners that live within a mile of a protected section of beach (e.g, state park, preserve, wildlife refuge). In total, 373 of 1,274 distributed surveys were returned and analyzed. The presence of a neighbor with coastal armoring was the most influential factor on a property owner intending to, or already having installed coastal armoring. Additionally, higher assessed property values and lower levels of education were also associated with intent to armor, or current presence of coastal armoring on a parcel.

Florida↗