Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70178570

Graphical function mapping as a new way to explore cause-and-effect chains

Mary Anne Evans
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Graphical function mapping provides a simple method for improving communication within interdisciplinary research teams and between scientists and nonscientists. This article introduces graphical function mapping using two examples and discusses its usefulness. Function mapping projects the outcome of one function into another to show the combined effect. Using this mathematical property in a simpler, even cartoon-like, graphical way allows the rapid combination of multiple information sources (models, empirical data, expert judgment, and guesses) in an intuitive visual to promote further discussion, scenario development, and clear communication.

Explore related subjects

FisheriesArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mary Anne Evans. 2016-11-04. Graphical function mapping as a new way to explore cause-and-effect chains. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2016.1221404

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

An integrated drought early warning system to support coldwater fisheries management

Low streamflow resulting from drought and human water use is a threat to freshwater fisheries throughout western North America, creating a need for effective tools to aid management and fisheries use. We developed a drought early warning framework that forecasts river conditions that could result in temporary fishery closures and restrictions across Montana’s renowned trout fisheries. This tool provides reach-specific, probabilistic decision support for proactive management under drought conditions. We calibrated statistical models using historical streamflow and stream temperature data from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauges to predict the likelihood of exceeding the low-flow and high-temperature thresholds for fisheries closure within 1- to 4-week outlooks during the warm season (May–October). These forecasts demonstrated consistently high model performance in predicting the criteria for low-flow fishing closure across all rivers (4-week outlook: mean R 2 = 0.96, IQR [interquartile range]: 0.94–0.97) and variable but often high model performance for temperature-based restriction criteria (mean R 2 = 0.80, IQR: 0.55–0.86), particularly at sites that frequently experience higher stream temperature conditions. This drought early warning system—available via the web-based tool TroutCast ( https://www.usgs.gov/apps/troutcast/ )—provides daily updated seasonal forecasts to help anticipate effects to recreational fishing opportunities. By quantifying forecast uncertainty and providing reach-specific probabilities, the system supports proactive management, improves coordination between fisheries and water managers, and provides stakeholders with actionable information on probable future effects on fishing access within a framework that is broadly applicable to other freshwater systems and water resource management challenges.

Montana↗
USGS2026

Strengthening ties between the U.S. Geological Survey and Interstate Fisheries Commissions

Fish inhabiting marine coastal and Great Lakes waters of the United States forage, migrate, and reproduce without regard to human-made boundaries. In the mid-20th century, the 32 states along the U.S. coasts and Great Lakes recognized the growing need for coordinated, interjurisdictional fisheries management and formed four interstate or international fisheries commissions through federal legislation. While distinct in their authorities, each commission shares functions to support their regional partners, including coordinating fisheries science and supporting information sharing. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is a federal bureau focused exclusively on science with substantial fisheries research capacity. This empowers USGS to serve as an independent broker of scientific information, which is greatly appreciated by decision-making agencies. The USGS does not maintain broad infrastructure for engaging partners across regions. Therefore, collaboration between the USGS and fisheries commissions ensures that USGS fisheries science helps address the most pressing interjurisdictional management priorities. The USGS has worked with fisheries commissions for decades to a greater or lesser extent in each of the four coastal regions: Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf, and Great Lakes. In 2020, the USGS began efforts to cohesively strengthen these partnerships across the regions. In 2024, leadership from four USGS fisheries science centers and headquarters met with the four fisheries commissions in person for the first time during the American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting. During the gathering, the new Interstate Fisheries Commissions–USGS Partnership developed coordination mechanisms and identified shared science priorities where the USGS capacity best aligns with the science needs of the commissions. Here we describe the history of collaboration between the USGS and fisheries commissions and the emerging interregional partnership.

Fisheries↗