Geology Reports⌕ Search

USGS · 70170988

Inferring social structure and its drivers from refuge use in the desert tortoise, a relatively solitary species

Abstract

For several species, refuges (such as burrows, dens, roosts, nests) are an essential resource for protection from predators and extreme environmental conditions. Refuges also serve as focal sites for social interactions, including mating, courtship, and aggression. Knowledge of refuge use patterns can therefore provide information about social structure, mating, and foraging success, as well as the robustness and health of wildlife populations, especially for species considered to be relatively solitary. In this study, we construct networks of burrow use to infer social associations in a threatened wildlife species typically considered solitary—the desert tortoise. We show that tortoise social networks are significantly different than null networks of random associations, and have moderate spatial constraints. We next use statistical models to identify major mechanisms behind individual-level variation in tortoise burrow use, popularity of burrows in desert tortoise habitat, and test for stressor-driven changes in refuge use patterns. We show that seasonal variation has a strong impact on tortoise burrow switching behavior. On the other hand, burrow age and topographical condition influence the number of tortoises visiting a burrow in desert tortoise habitat. Of three major population stressors affecting this species (translocation, drought, disease), translocation alters tortoise burrow switching behavior, with translocated animals visiting fewer unique burrows than residents. In a species that is not social, our study highlights the importance of leveraging refuge use behavior to study the presence of and mechanisms behind non-random social structure and individual-level variation. Our analysis of the impact of stressors on refuge-based social structure further emphasizes the potential of this method to detect environmental or anthropogenic disturbances.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pratha Sah, Kenneth E. Nussear, Todd C. Esque, Christina M. Aiello, Peter J. Hudson, Shweta Bansal. 2016-05-27. Inferring social structure and its drivers from refuge use in the desert tortoise, a relatively solitary species. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2136-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Family life is critical for migration and survival in a long-lived social bird

Extended parental care is common among birds and particularly well known among long-lived migratory species. Yet, factors influencing the duration of parental care are poorly understood, and empirical evidence for the functional importance of family life for offspring development is scarce. Using unique tracking and genetic data of 55 adult and juvenile migratory Bewick’s swans, among which 18 parent-offspring pairs and 13 sibling pairs, we quantify variation in family bond duration and identify the cause and consequences of their dissolution. Families generally broke up during the second half of the first northward migration of the offspring, when offspring were nearly one year old. Earlier separation occurred on the wintering grounds in response to disturbance ( n = 10 juveniles) and led to delayed migration and, critically, lower survival (40 vs. 86%). Our results provide rare empirical evidence that family bonds, as a pathway for social learning, are not just important, but vital to the migration and survival of young family-living birds.

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology↗

Cook Inlet beluga whale calling varies by group characteristics, behavior, and tidal state

Communication allows social species to exchange information among group members. In aquatic environments, acoustic signals are among the most effective forms of communication and are important for many species, including cetaceans. Beluga whales ( Delphinapterus leucas ) are highly social and vocal, yet little is known about the functionality of their social calls. To examine context-dependent vocal behavior in belugas, we collected passive acoustic data and fine-scale behavioral observations for the endangered Cook Inlet beluga population. The resulting dataset includes 1,720 annotated vocalizations collected over 21 behaviorally encoded encounters. We fit generalized linear mixed models to these data to investigate the effect of behavioral state, group size, calf presence, and tidal state on (1) calling rate (number of calls/minute) and (2) call category (whistles, pulsed calls, combined calls). Belugas were more likely to call when traveling and had higher calling rates during flood tides. Group-level calling rate increased sublinearly with group size, suggesting that individuals called less in larger groups, possibly reflecting increased listening, vocal coordination, or a strategy to avoid acoustic masking. Group calling rate increased before transitions between traveling and milling, suggesting a possible link between communication and behavioral transitions. Whistles were more prevalent when traveling, while pulsed calls were more prevalent when milling. Combined calls occurred only when calves were present, indicating the importance of these calls in communication with calves. Identifying these communication patterns and the contexts in which they occur can enhance our understanding of beluga whale ecology and aid in conservation efforts via passive acoustic monitoring.

Alaska↗

Effects of phylogeny and habitat on social structure and behavior of two equid species

Horses ( Equus caballus ) and donkeys ( E. asinus ) are closely related species with different evolutionary histories: their ancestral forms have different social systems related to their adaptations to different ecosystems, exhibiting female defense and resource defense polygyny respectively. We explored any plasticity of response and possible effects of phylogeny and habitat on these species in a feral state, comparing phylogenetic and habitat effects on behavior. We examined two feral horse populations in similar habitat in western Utah, USA, and two feral donkey populations in different habitat types (central Utah Colorado Plateau and central Arizona Sonoran Desert, USA), over 4 years. Species differences were observed: all donkeys spent more time feeding, moving, and lying down than horses, with horses standing more. Donkeys in the Sonoran Desert spent more time feeding and moving, and less time standing and lying down than on the Colorado Plateau. Horses showed less agonistic and affiliative behavior than donkeys. Between species there was no difference in network degree between horses and donkeys, and donkeys had a more saturated network with higher eigenvector centrality but lower clustering coefficient and fewer connected components than horses. Within a species, we found differences between horse populations in network degree, components, and edge density but no difference between donkey populations. Flexibility in how behavior is expressed reflects an interaction between a species’ habitat and their behavioral response to that habitat. Moreover, phylogenetic history seemingly plays a strong role in the behavioral ecology of a species, even after they are domesticated and become feralized.

Arizona, Utah↗