Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70145466

A simple headspace equilibration method for measuring dissolved methane

C Magen·L. L. Lapham·John W. Pohlman·Kristin N. Marshall·S. Bosman·Michael Casso·J. P. Chanton
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dissolved methane concentrations in the ocean are close to equilibrium with the atmosphere. Because methane is only sparingly soluble in seawater, measuring it without contamination is challenging for samples collected and processed in the presence of air. Several methods for analyzing dissolved methane are described in the literature, yet none has conducted a thorough assessment of the method yield, contamination issues during collection, transport and storage, and the effect of temperature changes and preservative. Previous extraction methods transfer methane from water to gas by either a "sparge and trap" or a "headspace equilibration" technique. The gas is then analyzed for methane by gas chromatography. Here, we revisit the headspace equilibration technique and describe a simple, inexpensive, and reliable method to measure methane in fresh and seawater, regardless of concentration. Within the range of concentrations typically found in surface seawaters (2-1000 nmol L -1 ), the yield of the method nears 100% of what is expected from solubility calculation following the addition of known amount of methane. In addition to being sensitive (detection limit of 0.1 ppmv, or 0.74 nmol L -1 ), this method requires less than 10 min per sample, and does not use highly toxic chemicals. It can be conducted with minimum materials and does not require the use of a gas chromatograph at the collection site. It can therefore be used in various remote working environments and conditions.

Explore related subjects

Limnology and Oceanography: MethodsArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Magen, L. L. Lapham, John W. Pohlman, Kristin N. Marshall, S. Bosman, Michael Casso, J. P. Chanton. 2014-09-08. A simple headspace equilibration method for measuring dissolved methane. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.637

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2023

An assessment of HgII to preserve carbonate system parameters in organic-rich estuarine waters

This work assesses the effectiveness of sample preservation techniques for measurements of pH T (total scale), total dissolved inorganic carbon (C T ), and total alkalinity (A T ) in organic-rich estuarine waters as well as the internal consistency of measurements and calculations (e.g., A T , pH T , and C T ) in these waters. Using mercuric chloride (HgCl 2 )-treated and untreated water samples, measurements of these carbonate system parameters were examined over a period of 3 months. Respiration of dissolved organic matter in untreated samples created large discrepancies in C T concentrations (~37 μ mol kg −1 increase, p < 0.0001), while C T was effectively constant in treated samples (3095.0 ± 1.14 μ mol kg −1 ). A T changes were observed for both treated and untreated samples, with HgCl 2 -treated samples showing the greatest variation (~ 26 μ mol kg −1 decrease, p < 0.001). In response to changing A T /C T ratios, pH T changes occurred in both treated and untreated samples but were relatively small in treated samples. Results in organic-rich estuarine waters that reflect the in situ carbonate system characteristics of the samples at the time of collection can be improved when samples obtained for C T and A T analysis are collected and stored separately. Accurate analyses of C T can be obtained by filtration and preservation with HgCl 2 . Accuracy of A T analyses can be improved by filtration and storage without adding HgCl 2 . The quality of pH T measurements can be improved by prompt analysis in the field and, if this cannot be accomplished, then samples can be preserved with HgCl 2 and measured in the laboratory within 1 week.

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods↗
USGS2023

Reconstructing missing data by comparing interpolation techniques: Applications for long-term water quality data

Missing data are typical yet must be addressed for proper inferences or expanding datasets to guide our limnological understanding and management of aquatic systems. Interpolation methods (i.e., estimating missing values using known values within the dataset) can alleviate data gaps and common problems. We compared seven popular interpolation methods for predicting substantial missingness in a long-term water quality dataset from the Upper Mississippi River, U.S.A. The dataset included 80,000 sampling sites collected over 30 yr that had substantial missingness for total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and water velocity. For all three interpolated water quality variables, random forests had very high prediction accuracy and outperformed the methods of ordinary kriging, polynomial regressions, regression trees, and inverse distance weighting. TP had a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.03 mg (L-TP) −1 , TN had a MAE of 0.39 mg (L-TN) −1 , and water velocity had a MAE of 0.10 m s −1 . The random forests' error rates were mapped and showed low spatiotemporal variability across the riverscape, indicating high model performance across many habitat types and large spatial scales. In the current era of “big data,” interpolation becomes an imperative step prior to ecological analyses yet remains unfamiliar and underutilized. Our research briefly describes the importance of addressing missingness and provides a roadmap to conduct model intercomparisons of other big datasets. We also share adaptable data analysis scripts, which allows others to readily conduct interpolation comparisons for many limnology applications and contexts.

Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin↗
USGS2021

Estimating pelagic primary production in lakes: Comparison of 14C incubation and free-water O2 approaches

Historically, estimates of pelagic primary production in lake ecosystems were made by measuring the uptake of carbon-14 ( 14 C)-labeled inorganic carbon in samples incubated under laboratory or in situ conditions. However, incubation approaches are increasingly being replaced by methods that analyze diel changes in high-frequency in situ data such as free-water dissolved oxygen (O 2 ). While there is a rich literature on the comparison of approaches for estimating primary production using incubations (e.g., 14 C and O 2 bottle experiments), as well for approaches using high-frequency data (e.g., diel O 2 and CO 2 metabolism models), there are few direct comparisons of 14 C incubations and free-water O 2 approaches for estimating primary production. We used 20 lake-years of concurrent measurements of primary production quantified from high-frequency free-water O 2 data and 14 C incubations in four different lakes (4–7 years per lake) to compare these different approaches. Across all lakes, 61% of the 14 C production estimates were within the 95% credible intervals of the free-water O 2 production estimates. Error-in-variable regressions support the assumption that 14 C methods estimate a production value between gross primary production and net primary production and the bottle effect is constant across the entire range of production values considered here. There was little evidence that daily pelagic, epilimnetic estimates of primary production differed substantially based on the selection of free-water O 2 or 14 C approaches in these lakes during summer stratified conditions.

Limnology and Oceanography: Methods↗