Geology Reports⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70141773

The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires

Alexandra D. Syphard·Teresa J. Brennan·Jon E. Keeley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the potential for worsening fire conditions, discussion is escalating over how to best reduce effects on urban communities. A widely supported strategy is the creation of defensible space immediately surrounding homes and other structures. Although state and local governments publish specific guidelines and requirements, there is little empirical evidence to suggest how much vegetation modification is needed to provide significant benefits. We analysed the role of defensible space by mapping and measuring a suite of variables on modern pre-fire aerial photography for 1000 destroyed and 1000 surviving structures for all fires where homes burned from 2001 to 2010 in San Diego County, CA, USA. Structures were more likely to survive a fire with defensible space immediately adjacent to them. The most effective treatment distance varied between 5 and 20 m (16–58 ft) from the structure, but distances larger than 30 m (100 ft) did not provide additional protection, even for structures located on steep slopes. The most effective actions were reducing woody cover up to 40% immediately adjacent to structures and ensuring that vegetation does not overhang or touch the structure. Multiple-regression models showed landscape-scale factors, including low housing density and distances to major roads, were more important in explaining structure destruction. The best long-term solution will involve a suite of prevention measures that include defensible space as well as building design approach, community education and proactive land use planning that limits exposure to fire.

Explore related subjects

International Journal of Wildland FireArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alexandra D. Syphard, Teresa J. Brennan, Jon E. Keeley. 2014. The role of defensible space for residential structure protection during wildfires. https://doi.org/10.1071/wf13158

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Elevated perspectives? A case study on the use of aerial imagery for rapid parcel-level wildfire risk assessments in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska

Background Parcel-level wildfire risk assessments are a crucial tool for understanding risks to residential parcels and identifying wildfire risk mitigation needs. Traditionally, wildfire risk assessments have been conducted in the field by traveling to each individual parcel; however, the development of new remote sensing technology has opened the possibility of conducting wildfire risk assessments remotely. Aims This case study evaluates the trade-offs of using remote imagery to conduct rapid parcel-level wildfire risk assessments. Methods We compare the quantitative and qualitative differences from conducting wildfire risk assessments remotely using aerial imagery and in-field using data from over 2500 parcels in the Alaskan wildland–urban interface. Key results We find significant differences between remote and in-field risk assessments in the coverage and alignment of particular wildfire risk attributes, including address postings, close vegetation and siding materials. Conclusions With high-resolution and contemporary data, remote assessments may be a viable approach for conducting parcel-level risk assessments and evaluating intra-community wildfire risk, though not without limitations. Compared with in-field methods, remote data collection methods do not provide the qualitative benefits acquired from practitioners working directly within communities. Implications Remote imagery can expand coverage of parcel-level wildfire risk assessments, but its performance varies by attributes and image quality.

Alaska↗
USGS2026

Estimating basal area change by tree size with Sentinel-2 imagery following four fires in California, USA

Background Failure to account for tree size when estimating burn severity may not accurately capture post-fire tree mortality and post-fire forest structure. Aims We explored whether basal area mortality by tree size class could be determined from remotely-sensed burn severity indices based solely on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Methods We used data collected in four large California wildfires to model the relationship between proportional basal area mortality and burn severity indices derived from Sentinel-2 imagery for three tree diameter class thresholds: small (15 to 30 cm), medium (30 to 50 cm) and large (>50 cm). Key results Our models showed that for a given burn severity index value, the proportion of mortality was greater overall in smaller trees, and that the proportion of mortality in large trees changed more slowly than that of smaller trees with changing burn severity index values. Conclusions We found that models that accounted for tree size can more precisely estimate changes in forest size structure than a similar model that did not account for tree size. Implications Explicitly accounting for tree size can improve estimates of post-fire forest structure, including for large trees which make up the bulk of stand biomass and post-fire seed sources.

California↗
USGS2026

Post-fire soil hydrologic response and recovery in northern California (USA)

Background Wildfires abruptly change landscapes by altering soil properties and vegetation cover. These changes are thought to reduce soil infiltration capacity, making landscapes susceptible to runoff and erosion. However, post-fire soil response is complex and likely varies across locations and time. Aims Here, we aim to understand regional post-fire soil response and recovery by tracking changes across different northern California (USA) lithology and vegetation types. Methods We conducted repeat in situ soil infiltration tests for 3 years post-fire at 31 burned and 10 unburned sites spanning the 2021 Dixie, 2020 LNU Lightning Complex, 2020 Walbridge and 2020 Glass fires. Key results Our two main findings are: (1) burned chaparral soils have increased hydraulic conductivity compared with unburned sites, and (2) infiltration rates return to pre-fire conditions within 3 years across most lithologies and vegetations. Conclusions Recovery might be generalizable by vegetation and lithology but differ regionally, making it important to identify meaningful hydrologic response units (HRUs). Multi-year studies with paired burned and unburned measurements can constrain the recovery timeline and provide information missed by observations solely of burned soils. Implications Understanding where, and for how long, soil remains susceptible to runoff and erosion can help prioritize areas and time periods most in need of mitigation.

California↗