Distribution and movement of Big Spring spinedace ( Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis ) in Condor Canyon, Meadow Valley Wash, Nevada

Ian G. Jezorek; Patrick J. Connolly

doi:10.3398/064.073.0306

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70058665

Distribution and movement of Big Spring spinedace ( Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis ) in Condor Canyon, Meadow Valley Wash, Nevada

Ian G. Jezorek·Patrick J. Connolly

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Big Spring spinedace (Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis) is a cyprinid whose entire population occurs within a section of Meadow Valley Wash, Nevada. Other spinedace species have suffered population and range declines (one species is extinct). Managers, concerned about the vulnerability of Big Spring spinedace, have considered habitat restoration actions or translocation, but they have lacked data on distribution or habitat use. Our study occurred in an 8.2-km section of Meadow Valley Wash, including about 7.2 km in Condor Canyon and 0.8 km upstream of the canyon. Big Spring spinedace were present upstream of the currently listed critical habitat, including in the tributary Kill Wash. We found no Big Spring spinedace in the lower 3.3 km of Condor Canyon. We tagged Big Spring spinedace ≥70 mm fork length (range 70–103 mm) with passive integrated transponder tags during October 2008 (n = 100) and March 2009 (n = 103) to document movement. At least 47 of these individuals moved from their release location (up to 2 km). Thirty-nine individuals moved to Kill Wash or the confluence area with Meadow Valley Wash. Ninety-three percent of movement occurred in spring 2009. Fish moved both upstream and downstream. We found no movement downstream over a small waterfall at river km 7.9 and recorded only one fish that moved downstream over Delmue Falls (a 12-m drop) at river km 6.1. At the time of tagging, there was no significant difference in fork length or condition between Big Spring Spinedace that were later detected moving and those not detected moving. We found no significant difference in fork length or condition at time of tagging of Big Spring spinedace ≥70 mm fork length that were detected moving and those not detected moving. Kill Wash and its confluence area appeared important to Big Spring spinedace; connectivity with these areas may be key to species persistence. These areas may provide a habitat template for restoration or translocation. The lower 3.3 km of Meadow Valley Wash in Condor Canyon may be a good candidate section for habitat restoration actions.

Explore related subjects

Western North American Naturalist Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 37.6147178° to 37.6196828° latitude; -114.5207027° to -114.5105221° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ian G. Jezorek, Patrick J. Connolly. 2013. Distribution and movement of Big Spring spinedace ( Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis ) in Condor Canyon, Meadow Valley Wash, Nevada. https://doi.org/10.3398/064.073.0306

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Northern Yellowstone mule deer seasonal movement, habitat selection, and survival patterns

We determined the movement patterns and survival rates of 85 radio-marked adult female Rocky Mountain mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus hemionus ) wintering on the Northern Yellowstone Winter Range (NYWR). We assessed seasonal movement and distribution patterns and individual fidelity to those patterns, along with seasonal habitat selection and survival rates. Twenty-three percent of the deer were nonmigratory, remaining on the winter range year-round, and 77% were migratory, moving 10–104 km from winter to summer ranges. No deer switched between migratory and nonmigratory status. All migratory deer that were monitored for ≥ 2 years exhibited traditional movement patterns and utilized the same winter and summer ranges in all years. Mean winter and summer home range sizes for migratory deer were 1076 ha (SE 129) and 1527 ha (SE 249), respectively, and mean home range size for resident deer was 3100 ha (SE 902). There was a dichotomy in winter habitat use, with one group of deer selecting cultivated and grassland vegetation land cover classes and a second group of deer selecting shrubland and grassland vegetation land cover classes. A dichotomy in summer habitat use was evident between those deer selecting for unburned forest and avoiding all burned land cover classes and those deer selecting for moderate and high burn intensity land cover classes and avoiding unburned forest. We estimated annual mean survival at 0.813 (SE 0.028) and found no differences in survival rates among migratory deer, nonmigratory deer, or deer exhibiting differences in winter or summer habitat selection patterns.

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming↗

USGS2026

Interspecific brood parasitism of a greater sage-grouse brood by chukar in Nevada

Greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter, sage-grouse) populations have declined across their range, resulting in high conservation concerns among state and federal wildlife managers. While interspecific nest parasitism by chukar ( Alectoris chukar ) on sage-grouse nests has been observed previously, the parasitic effects benefiting or harming the reproduction of either species are unknown. Additionally, while chukar eggs have been documented in sage-grouse nests previously, we know of no documented occurrences of chukar chicks parasitizing sage-grouse broods. Here, we report a novel observation of interspecific brood parasitism on a 9-day-old sage-grouse brood by a chukar chick in the Virginia Mountains of northwestern Nevada. Because chukar are an introduced exotic species whose western North American distribution largely overlaps sage-grouse distribution, understanding the dynamics and implications of brood parasitism may inform wildlife management strategies and conservation efforts for sage-grouse throughout their range.

Nevada↗

USGS2025

Pleistocene porcupine (Erethizontidae) records in arid southwestern North America and comparisons with the modern distribution of Erethizon dorsatum in southern California and Arizona

he North American porcupine ( Erethizon dorsatum ) is widely distributed throughout many ecosystems on the continent from northern Mexico to the Arctic Ocean, except for the southeastern portion of the United States. Habitats include the arid Desert Southwest region where modern records are generally sparse. The paleogeographic range in the Desert Southwest is not unlike the modern distribution of Erethizon , with some exceptions. Although there are early Pleistocene records of Erethizon for southern California, no late Pleistocene records (Rancholabrean North American Land Mammal Age [NALMA]) are known for Imperial, Inyo, Riverside, or San Bernardino Counties in southern California or in Mexico. This is surprising given late-Pleistocene records in Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico and modern records from southern California and Mexico. Pleistocene habitats for porcupines were similar to those occupied today, just at different elevations due to differing climates. Modern preferred habitats in the Desert Southwest include conifer-clad high-elevation areas and associated pinyon pine / juniper belts, and occasionally riparian corridors in desert environments. The overall rarity of porcupines today in arid parts of the Desert Southwest is likely due to the combination of increasing aridity in the region during the Holocene, past persecution by humans, and increasing predator populations.

Arizona, California↗