Geology ReportsSearch

USGS · 70035148

Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions

Abstract

The magnitude and feedbacks of future methane release from the Arctic region are unknown. Despite limited documentation of potential future releases associated with thawing permafrost and degassing methane hydrates, the large potential for future methane releases calls for improved understanding of the interaction of a changing climate with processes in the Arctic and chemical feedbacks in the atmosphere. Here we apply a “state of the art” atmospheric chemistry transport model to show that large emissions of CH4 would likely have an unexpectedly large impact on the chemical composition of the atmosphere and on radiative forcing (RF). The indirect contribution to RF of additional methane emission is particularly important. It is shown that if global methane emissions were to increase by factors of 2.5 and 5.2 above current emissions, the indirect contributions to RF would be about 250% and 400%, respectively, of the RF that can be attributed to directly emitted methane alone. Assuming several hypothetical scenarios of CH4 release associated with permafrost thaw, shallow marine hydrate degassing, and submarine landslides, we find a strong positive feedback on RF through atmospheric chemistry. In particular, the impact of CH4 is enhanced through increase of its lifetime, and of atmospheric abundances of ozone, stratospheric water vapor, and CO2 as a result of atmospheric chemical processes. Despite uncertainties in emission scenarios, our results provide a better understanding of the feedbacks in the atmospheric chemistry that would amplify climate warming.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ivar Isaksen, Michael Gauss, Gunnar Myhre, Katey M. Walter Anthony, Carolyn Ruppel. 2011-04-20. Strong atmospheric chemistry feedback to climate warming from Arctic methane emissions. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gb003845

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Global carbon investment in terrestrial biological nitrogen fixation

Biological nitrogen (N) fixation (BNF) provides the N needed to produce proteins and other biological building blocks, helping feed humanity and mitigate climate change. Due to its high energetic cost compared to other forms of N acquisition, biotic investment in BNF indicates N limitation. Globally gridded BNF flux data provide an opportunity to determine the energetic investment in BNF across ecosystems, which would help reconcile conflicting indicators of N limitation. Here, we use a new BNF synthesis to quantify the relative importance of BNF in different N-fixing niches, in different biomes, and across the globe by calculating the fraction of net primary productivity (NPP) invested in BNF and the fraction of plant N acquisition provided by BNF. Larger fractions of non-agricultural NPP were invested in BNF in less-productive, higher-latitude biomes. This pattern was driven by biocrusts and mosses. Similarly, non-agricultural symbiotic N-fixing plants invested relatively more of their own NPP in BNF in less-productive, higher-latitude biomes. This symbiotic plant pattern was driven by shrubs and herbs, overriding the opposite pattern in trees. Symbiotic plants also acquired a higher fraction of their N from BNF at higher latitudes and in less productive biomes. Investments in symbiotic BNF were 10× higher in agricultural (2.9% of NPP) versus natural (0.29%) biomes, providing 26% versus 3.1% of ecosystem-scale plant N acquisition. These results support the paradigm of strong N limitation at higher latitudes, help understand the rarity of N-fixing trees at higher latitudes, underscore the dominance of human activity, and inform terrestrial biosphere models.

Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Erosional and hydrological controls on the age and thermochemical stability of particulate organic carbon in an Arctic river

Understanding the mechanisms that drive the mobilization and fate of organic carbon (OC) in Arctic landscapes is important for modeling the feedbacks among permafrost thaw, carbon cycling, and climate change. While significant progress has been made toward measuring in situ OC decomposition in permafrost soils and bulk particulate organic carbon (POC) export from Arctic rivers, few studies have distinguished the source and lability of POC across Arctic landscapes, limiting our ability to predict whether mobilized POC will be oxidized to CO 2 and CH 4 or buried in downstream depositional environments. This study uses ramped pyrolysis/oxidation radiocarbon (RPO- 14 C) analyses to investigate spatial and temporal variations in the thermochemical stability and radiocarbon content of fluvial POC during downstream transport from mountains to the coast in the Canning River (North Slope, Alaska). Fluvial POC in the headwaters is predominantly comprised of high activation energy, thermally recalcitrant petrogenic OC (OC petro ) derived from shale bedrock. Moving into the foothills and low-relief coastal plains, river bank erosion primarily drives mobilization of labile, low activation energy, soil-derived OC (OC soil ). Fluvial POC in mountainous upstream reaches consisted of ∼70% OC petro and just ∼30% OC soil , while POC in the downstream coastal plain reaches comprised ∼85% OC soil and ∼15% OC petro . The high relative lability of POC exported to the coast indicates high susceptibility to oxidation and microbial decomposition, which could enhance CO 2 release as the Arctic hydrologic cycle intensifies. However, the persistence of refractory OC petro in the suspended load indicates the potential for long-term burial of rock organic carbon in marine sediments.

Alaska

Net CO2 emissions from dry inland waters persist in the presence of vegetation

Many inland waters are shrinking due to shifts in climate and water diversion for human uses. As they dry out, their exposed sediments emit large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) to the atmosphere. However, current global estimates of CO 2 emissions from dry inland waters are derived exclusively from bare sediment dark-chamber measurements that do not account for the colonization of desiccated areas by vegetation. To understand the impact of vegetation on CO 2 emissions from dry sediments, we analyzed 164 dry inland water bodies across five climatic regions and five inland water body types (lakes, ponds, reservoirs, streams and wetlands). On average, within vegetated zones, vegetation occupied 47 ± 35% in measured biomass quadrants. Light-induced decreases in instantaneous CO 2 emissions in vegetated dry sediments were lower (mean ± SD = −3.7 ± 12.9 mmol CO 2 m −2 hr −1 ) than increases during dark conditions (14.7 ± 20.1 mmol CO 2 m −2 hr −1 ). Diel (24-hr) CO 2 emissions from dry, vegetated sediments (mean ± SD = 100 ± 261 mmol CO 2 m −2 d −1 ) were 25% lower than in bare sediments (133 ± 245 mmol CO 2 m −2 d −1 ). These results indicate that vegetation can partially off-set sediment respiration, although the magnitude of this effect is insufficient to switch dry beds from net sources to net sinks of carbon.

Global Biogeochemical Cycles